The American Law Review, Volume 30Little, Brown, and Company, 1896 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 70
Page 70
... held that they were to be ascertained when the con- tingent event should occur , if ever . In Putnam v . Story , 2 there was a limitation to the heirs of a person who was living at the testator's decease ; and it was held that an heir ...
... held that they were to be ascertained when the con- tingent event should occur , if ever . In Putnam v . Story , 2 there was a limitation to the heirs of a person who was living at the testator's decease ; and it was held that an heir ...
Page 74
... held that the devisor , John , the grandson of John , the elder , and the son of Anthony , had " no estate devisable , but a mere possibility during the life of Mary or any of her issue ; " and that the conveyance to the sisters of ...
... held that the devisor , John , the grandson of John , the elder , and the son of Anthony , had " no estate devisable , but a mere possibility during the life of Mary or any of her issue ; " and that the conveyance to the sisters of ...
Page 75
... held , not devisable by the person entitled thereto , whilst they remained contingent , as in the case of Bishop v . Fountaine . " And he says : The reasons upon which the estate was held a mere possibility dur- ing the life of Mary or ...
... held , not devisable by the person entitled thereto , whilst they remained contingent , as in the case of Bishop v . Fountaine . " And he says : The reasons upon which the estate was held a mere possibility dur- ing the life of Mary or ...
Page 77
... Held that under the statutes of Delaware , the husband was en- titled as the heir of that child of his which last died . In this case , no question arose as to any alienation of any kind by any- body . In Moore v . Rake , 1 the judges ...
... Held that under the statutes of Delaware , the husband was en- titled as the heir of that child of his which last died . In this case , no question arose as to any alienation of any kind by any- body . In Moore v . Rake , 1 the judges ...
Page 79
... held that the heir of the donor of a fee simple conditional , is to be ascertained at the expiration of the fee simple conditional ; and it is said that before the expira- tion thereof there is no power in the heir to convey nor to ...
... held that the heir of the donor of a fee simple conditional , is to be ascertained at the expiration of the fee simple conditional ; and it is said that before the expira- tion thereof there is no power in the heir to convey nor to ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action amendment appears applied appointed authority bill Central Pacific Railroad charter Chief Justice Circuit Court cited citizen civil claim common law constitution contract corporation Court of Appeals creditors criminal Dartmouth College debts decided decision declared defendant District doctrine domicile Durrant duty election enforce England English equity executive exercise fact favor Federal forgery Fourteenth Amendment fraud grant heir held House of Lords interest International Law Irving Browne Judge judgment judicial judiciary jurisdiction jury land lawyers legal tender legislative legislature liability Lord ment Missouri mortgage negligence nolle prosequi opinion parol evidence parties payment person plaintiff President principle provision purpose question railroad company railway reason receiver referred rendered rule S. W. Rep seal statute statute of frauds Supreme Court Texas tion trial United witness Wong Kim Ark writing York