The American Law Review, Volume 30Little, Brown, and Company, 1896 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 70
Story , there was a limitation to the heirs of a person who was living at the
testator's decease ; and it was held that an heir apparent could make a valid
alienation which , of course , would be subject to the contingency of his surviving
his ...
Story , there was a limitation to the heirs of a person who was living at the
testator's decease ; and it was held that an heir apparent could make a valid
alienation which , of course , would be subject to the contingency of his surviving
his ...
Page 74
It was held that the devisor , John , the grandson of John , the elder , and the son
of Anthony , had “ no estate devisable , but a mere possibility during the life of
Mary or any of her issue ; ' and that the conveyance to the sisters of Anthony ,
also ...
It was held that the devisor , John , the grandson of John , the elder , and the son
of Anthony , had “ no estate devisable , but a mere possibility during the life of
Mary or any of her issue ; ' and that the conveyance to the sisters of Anthony ,
also ...
Page 75
But in Jones v . Perry , the devise was not by an heir . Mr. Fearne , speaking of
Bishop v . Fountaine , says : “ Contingent estates , appear formerly to have been
held , not devisable by the person entitled thereto , whilst they remained
contingent ...
But in Jones v . Perry , the devise was not by an heir . Mr. Fearne , speaking of
Bishop v . Fountaine , says : “ Contingent estates , appear formerly to have been
held , not devisable by the person entitled thereto , whilst they remained
contingent ...
Page 77
Held that under the statutes of Delaware , the husband was entitled as the heir of
that child of his which last died . In this case , no question arose as to any
alienation of any kind by anybody . In Moore v . Rake , the judges lay stress upon
the ...
Held that under the statutes of Delaware , the husband was entitled as the heir of
that child of his which last died . In this case , no question arose as to any
alienation of any kind by anybody . In Moore v . Rake , the judges lay stress upon
the ...
Page 79
Killian , it was held that the heir of the donor of a fee simple conditional , is to be
ascertained at the expiration of the fee simple conditional ; and it is said that
before the expiration thereof there is no power in the heir to convey nor to devise
, yet ...
Killian , it was held that the heir of the donor of a fee simple conditional , is to be
ascertained at the expiration of the fee simple conditional ; and it is said that
before the expiration thereof there is no power in the heir to convey nor to devise
, yet ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted amendment American appears applied appointed authority Bank bill born called cause charge charter cited citizen civil claim common Congress constitution contract corporation creditors debts decided decision defendant doctrine duty effect England English evidence executive exercise existence express fact Federal give given grant ground hands held hold House important intended interest International issue Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyers learned legislative legislature limited Lord matter means ment nature necessary negligence never opinion parties passed payment person political practice present President principle provision question railroad reason receiver referred regard relating rendered respect rule seal secure statute Supreme Court tion trial United witness writing York