The Law Magazine and Review: A Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence, Volume 23Saunders and Benning, 1855 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 44
Page 136
They propose ( first ) that where the amount claimed in the County Court falls
within its present concurrent jurisdiction , i . e . , where it exceeds 51. in tort and
201. in contract , but does not exceed 501. , the defendant should be permitted to
...
They propose ( first ) that where the amount claimed in the County Court falls
within its present concurrent jurisdiction , i . e . , where it exceeds 51. in tort and
201. in contract , but does not exceed 501. , the defendant should be permitted to
...
Page 137
To our apprehension , a limit of 1001 , for the concurrent jurisdiction of the inferior
court would not be excessive , its exclusive jurisdiction in regard to matters of
contract ranging , as at present , up to 201. , and extending to a like amount in tort
...
To our apprehension , a limit of 1001 , for the concurrent jurisdiction of the inferior
court would not be excessive , its exclusive jurisdiction in regard to matters of
contract ranging , as at present , up to 201. , and extending to a like amount in tort
...
Page 138
We think that the suggestion here made by the learned commissioners is a very
useful one , and trust that it may be carried out . It will be remarked , however ,
that no proposition is made in this Report for giving jurisdiction to the local court
in ...
We think that the suggestion here made by the learned commissioners is a very
useful one , and trust that it may be carried out . It will be remarked , however ,
that no proposition is made in this Report for giving jurisdiction to the local court
in ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
POINTS IN THE HISTORY OF OUR | 1 |
FESSIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY | 66 |
THE TRANSMISSION OF THE EXECUTOR | 110 |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according action actual allowed amount appears applied appropriation authority bill called character charge circumstances claim committed common consideration considered constructive contract County Court course creditor debt debtor decided defendant direct discharge doubt duty effect England established evidence examination existence express extent fact give given ground hand held House important instance interest judge judgment jurisdiction Justice knowledge land learned less liability limited London Lord Brougham Lyndhurst matter means measure ment mind nature never notice object observed obtained opinion original Parliament particular party passed payment period person political position possession practice present principle proceedings purchaser question reason received reference regard remarks Report respect rule statute taken tion trust whole writ