Results 1-5 of 100
The plaintiff company, by its statement of claim, alleged that the defendants had
systematically, from the time the company commenced business, caused false
entries to be made in the books of the company. The defendants, after delivery of
1886. JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. LIMITED IN Quaxcnnr. Army axn Navy Horst.
LmI'i'nn.—Ci-editors are required, on or before Nov 11. to send their names and
addresses, and the particulars of their debts or claims, to Charles James March.
_ It remained open to the creditor, in cases where there was any impediment _to
legal execution _under section ll, to filo a bill (without waiting for the expiration of
the year to entitle him to his new remedy under section 13) claiming relief_ ...
They wore sealed with the company's seal, signed by two of the directors, and
countersigned by _the secretary, and bore date the 10th of May, 1882. The claim
was resisted by the plaintiff on behalf of the other debentureholders. Both Chitty,
C0aa0iionATIO>'This was the further consideration of an administration action,
and the question arose whether a claim for £1,000 against the estate of the
testator could be admitted upon the iincorroborated evidence of _the claimant.
What people are saying - Write a review
Mr Vusumzi Msi , Barrister & Solicitor look at you as $ sign
very unprofessional unexperienced lawyer , he is beyond your imagination ,he shop around other lawyers to get an idea how much he can charge you , I will write complaint and if any one knows how I can find a lawyer to sue him please help me
this guy has no clue , he charge me 25 hours of his work and when I ask him small part of the case he doesn't know anything about it , he is unbelivable