Results 1-5 of 100
The plaintiff company, by its statement of claim, alleged that the defendants had
systematically, from the time the company commenced business, caused false
entries to be made in the books of the company. The defendants, after delivery of
1886. JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. LIMITED IN Quaxcnnr. Army axn Navy Horst.
LmI'i'nn.—Ci-editors are required, on or before Nov 11. to send their names and
addresses, and the particulars of their debts or claims, to Charles James March.
... disposing power (described as in section 11); and it is to hind all persons
claiming under him after such judgment, and also ... Cawell, 6 Q. B. D. 75),
although the plaintiff has not expressly claimed a receiver by his statement of
claim (Salt v.
The claim was resisted by the plaintiff on behalf of the other debentureholders.
Both Chitty, J ., and the Oourt of ... Chitty, J., refused to admit the claims, and his
decision was affirmed on behalf of the appellants. It was argued that, as against a
In opposition to the claim it was not suggested that the claimant's testimony was
untrue—indeed, it was admitted that he ... is in the Chancery Division a rule that
such a claim will not be admitted on the uncorroboratcd evidence of the claimant.
What people are saying - Write a review
Mr Vusumzi Msi , Barrister & Solicitor look at you as $ sign
very unprofessional unexperienced lawyer , he is beyond your imagination ,he shop around other lawyers to get an idea how much he can charge you , I will write complaint and if any one knows how I can find a lawyer to sue him please help me
this guy has no clue , he charge me 25 hours of his work and when I ask him small part of the case he doesn't know anything about it , he is unbelivable