Results 1-5 of 100
The application was, of course, Tfifused. In Thomas v. The Duchess of Ha1ni'Ito'n
—-an action for the P1'1<>9 Of goods supplied—an order for service out of the
jurisdiction had b%8n_ made and service had been effected. The defendant then
Every application to the court under sections 18 and 23 to approve a composition
, a fee computed ut the following rates on t e gross amount of the com sition—viz.,
£1 on the first £100 or fraction of £310, and 5s. on each £25 or fraction of £25 ...
Impressed. section 103 of the Act. Every application for an iApplication,
Impressed. order of discharge. i And for each creditor to 1 Application.
Adhesiveex. be notified. 1 cept where number ex_ _ ceeds 20. Every application
to the Application.
C0§!PANY—Wl.\'lllNG-l'l' ORni;a—Rion'r or A1-roan. A question arose in this
case as to the right of a company to appeal from a winding-up order. The
application was made in the name of the company for leave to appeal (
notwithstanding the ...
This was an application by the defendants that the plaintiff company might be
ordered to give further and better particulars in writing of certain improper, wrong,
fraudulent, and false entries, and of misrep)iéesentation alleged by them in their
What people are saying - Write a review
Mr Vusumzi Msi , Barrister & Solicitor look at you as $ sign
very unprofessional unexperienced lawyer , he is beyond your imagination ,he shop around other lawyers to get an idea how much he can charge you , I will write complaint and if any one knows how I can find a lawyer to sue him please help me
this guy has no clue , he charge me 25 hours of his work and when I ask him small part of the case he doesn't know anything about it , he is unbelivable