Results 1-5 of 75
1 , 25th and 26th October . ... Impressed . was a “ final order " within ord . ... Dated
the 25th day of October , 1886 . plaintiff , the bill of sale holder , contended that
this was a clause for the s maintenance of the security , " as it helped the grantee
... the October . company for leave to appeal ( notwithstanding the expiration of
the proper time ) from an order for the compulsory winding up of the company
made COMPANY - WINDING - Up Petition - Gen . ORD . , NOVEMBER , 1862 , R.
PAYNTER that that copy was an accurate copy of the delivered copy , NORTH , J.
, -Kay , J. , 28th October . declined to ... go further and say in what respect they
were false , and that the court bad ample power to require this to be done by ord .
In replying , the Ootober 25th and October 26th , and afterwards as usual , every
Wednesday , author said the so - called ... the mother would be entitled to In_re
Brazilian Rys Constraction Corpo ldapp of E D Oppert from ord of Mr administer
Petn for winding up , presented Oct 22 . and appla to C A for new trial under art 3
of rule 1. ord 39 July 14 directed to be heard before Chitty . J , on Nov 6.
Speechly & Co , New inn , Mellor v Thompson app of dft from refusal of Mr Justice
What people are saying - Write a review
Mr Vusumzi Msi , Barrister & Solicitor look at you as $ sign
very unprofessional unexperienced lawyer , he is beyond your imagination ,he shop around other lawyers to get an idea how much he can charge you , I will write complaint and if any one knows how I can find a lawyer to sue him please help me
this guy has no clue , he charge me 25 hours of his work and when I ask him small part of the case he doesn't know anything about it , he is unbelivable