there be subsequent conduct on either side making a divorce REVIEWS. THE PUBLIC HEALTH ACT. CONTAINING THE VARIOUS INCORPORATED STATUTES, &c. By woman in her character as wife, and to be paid to her while W. G. LUMLEY, Esq., LL.M., Q.C., Counsel to the Local Government Board, and EDMUND LUMLEY, B.A., Barrister-at-Law. she continues a wife, and, consequently, to THIRD separation EDITION. By W. PATCHETT, Esq., Q.C., and ALEXANDER MACdeeds in which such provision is made. Probably, however, the MORRAN, M.A., Barrister-at-Law. Shaw & Sons. court has power, of its own inherent jurisdiction, to make fresh The last edition of this work appears to have met with the sucarrangements upon a dissolution of marriage. Thus, in Morrell v. cess which it deserved. Less than three years is a short period for Morrell (6 P. D. 98), where there was subsequent incestuous the exhaustion of an edition of a work of this magnitude, and it is adultery by the husband, it was held that the wife was entitled to stated that the second edition has been out of print for some time. sue for dissolution, and, as incident to the suit, to ask for new In the present edition the principal additions in the way of legislamaintenance. See, too, Benyon v. Benyon (1 P. D. 447). But tion are the Public Health (Members and Officers) Act, 1885; the there is no such power upon a judicial separation merely: Thus, Diseases (Animals) Act, 1886. These Acts are inserted in the text, and in Gandy v. Gandy (7 P. D. 168), where, upon the husband's are fully annotated, with exemplary care to place before the reader adultery, the wife obtained judicial separation and the custody of everything illustrating the operation of the different sections. Thus the children, she was refused any further alimony, since no con- in section 12 of the Housing of the Working Classes Act, 1885, duct of the husband had so affected her as to entitle her to re- which, in the case of houses let to “persons of the working classes,”. pudiate the deed. This is an authority, too, for the more general alters the rule of law and implies à condition that an unfurnished proposition that the deed is not avoided by subsequent adultery on house is reasonably fit for human habitation, there is a most exeither side, not even when it is followed by a dissolution of the haustive collection of cases shewing the effect of such an implication marriage, unless provided by the court in the manner described in the case of furnished houses. The appendix has had added to it above. Thus in @harlesworth v. Holt (9 Ex. 38) the husband's several statutes, including many of the last session, which are all liability to pay an annuity continued because not expressly limited looked for we have found very satisfactorily stated or noticed, and The recent decisions we have CORRESPONDENCE. THE COPYHOLD ACT, 1887. [To the Editor of the Solicitors' Journal.] agreement to contain "usual provisions," when adultery has been Sir,—The Copyhold Act, 1887, s. 6, to which you refer in your proved against the wife. issue of to-day, appears to mean this : (1) That the lord shall not As the deed is made with a view to separation, it has been held hereafter (without the approval of the Land Commissioners) grant that its effect is limited to such separation. Hence it will be any part of the waste lands of the manor, which prior to the Act he a subsequent reconciliation and return to cohabitation. Only the consent of the homage but also the consent of the CommisBoth these points, however, are essential. Thus the deed is not sioners necessary to any future grant. And (2) that any part of the avoided by a reconciliation if the parties continue to live apart, as waste so granted witń such double consent as aforesaid (i.e., any in Frampton v. Frampton (4 Beav. 287), nor by the living under grant " lawfully made") shall not, as heretofore, be of copyhold the same roof, but in a state of the highest animosity, as in Bate- tenure, but shall eo instantí be or become as of freehold tenure (i.e., held man y. Ross (1 Dow. 235). When, however, trusts are created as in free and common socage). As you are aware, by the Commons which may appear to look beyond a mere separation, it is best to Act, 1876 (39 & 40 Vict. c. 56), s. 31, the lord's right to approve provide for their cessation by an express clause if it is so intended. under the Štatute of Merton was entitled by requiring the concent of the Commissioners; and so, by section 6 of the Copyhold Act, Thus, in Ruffles v. Alston (19 Eq. 539) and Randle v. Gould (6 1887, the lord's right to grant the waste with the sanction of the W. R. 108)," upon consideration of the whole scope of the deeds in homage is entitled in like manner. After much consideration of either case, they were held not to be avoided by subsequent recon- the section, this is the only interpretation of it I can satisfactorily ciliation. arrive at. A. B. It appears, then, that the law of separation deeds is more firmly October 8, 1887. settled than the judical dicta which we placed at the beginning of [See observations under head of “ Current Topics.” The word the first article would lead us to expect. entitled,” occurring twice in one of the sentences of the above THE DEEDS OF ARRANGEMENT ACT, 1887. | To the Editor of the Solicitors' Journal.] ally " in section 4 (2) would seem to shew that this is a correct mony with public opinion and established upon a rational basis. interpretation of the Act. If this is the case the adoption of ARTHUR E. ABRAHAMS. [The words referred to appear to govern the whole of the definition Tuesday's Gazette contains a return shewing the number of receiving of 5 deed of arrangement” in section 4, but has our correspondent orders in the High Court, and in the several County Courts having considered the question of the validity of separate compositions with Bankruptcy jurisdiction in England and Wales, gazetted in the quarters each creditor ?--Ed. S.J.] and nine months ending respectively 30th September, 1885, 1886, and 1887. In the High Court the figures for the three months were--in 1887, 204; in 1886, 197; and in 1885, 192. The corresponding figures in other courts were, 1,029, 969, and 890, the totals being 1,233, 1,166, and 1,082 It is stated that the Court of Common Council last week agreed to the respectively. For the nine months the figures for the three years in the report of the Law and City Courts Committee, recommending that the High Court were 654, 643, and 606 ; in other courts, 2,990, 2,946, and appointment of Mr. F. Roxburgh as permanent Assistant Judge of the 2,709; and the totals were 3,644, 3,589, and 3,315 respectively. Mayor's Court should not be confirmed. avoided by directing the defendant to deliver to the receiver in the action all promis. CASES BEFORE THE VACATION JUDGE. sory notes, securities, and documents. This order had not been complied with. This was a motion for leave to issue a writ of attachment against Petition—Trustbes—Removal-Costs—BANKRUPTCY Act, 1883 (46 & 47 the defendant for non-compliance with the order. A preliminary objec. Vict. c. 52), s. 147. tion was raised on behalf of the defendant that no time was mentioned in the order within which the defendant was to comply with it. The plainIn the case of Re Firth, Firth v. Clarke, before Charles, J., on the 7th tiff should get a four-day order. Rule 5 of order 41 provides nst., a question arose under the Bankruptcy Act, 1883, as to the removal tbat, Every judgment or order made in any cause or matter of trustees against whom a receiving order had been made. The case act thereby ordered shall state the came on on petition on behalf of beneficiaries under the will of Joseph requiring any person to do an Firth, asking that two trustees might be removed and others appointed. time, or the time after service of the judgment or order, within which the and it was alleged that about £2,200 of the trust funds had been removed. 266). The deed appointing the trustees was dated the 16th of December, 1864, act is to be done.” Refereuce was made to Gilbert v. Endean (9 Ch. D. In cases which involved the liberty of the subject the utmost An originating summors was then taken out. On the 9th of September, strictness should be observed, and the motion should be refused with costs. 1887, a receiving order was made against the trustees. Section 147 of thé On behalf of the plaintiff, it was contended that the defendant bad Bankruptcy Act, 1883, provides that where a bankrupt is a trustee within allowed an enormous mass of affidavits to be filed, and then raised a the Trustee Act, 1850, section 32 of that Act shall have effect so as to purely technicel objection. authorize the appointment of a new trustee in substitution for the bank CHARLES, J., refused the motion, without costs. —Counsel, Kenyon rupt (whether voluntarily resigning or not), if it appears expedient to do Parker; Archibald Brown. Solicitors, Geare, Son, f Peace, for Wake f 80, and all provisions of that Act, aud of any other Act relative thereto, Co., Sheffield ; Pitman & Sons, for Auty, Sheffield. shall have effect accordingly. On babalf of the petitioners reference was COMPANY - PETITION PRESENTATION Notice - PRIORITY Costs made to Re Adams's Trusts (12_Ch. D. 634) and Re Lawson's Trusts (29 R. S. C., 1883, V., 9. SOLICITORS' JOURNAL, 115), where Kay, J. considered the Bankruptcy Act, 1883. Two beneficiaries were made respondents, and asked for their J., on the 12th inst., the question arose as to whether the petitioner, In the case of the Middlesex Manufacturing Co. (Limited), before Charles, costs. The trustees did not appear. CHARLES, J., made the order as prayed by the petition, adding that the where a petition had been previously, but without his knowledge, prenew trustees, when appointed, should raise and pay out of the trust funds sented on the same day, was entitled to his costs. Two petitions were the costs of the petitioner and of the two respondents who appeared, as presented by creditors on the 16th of September, 1887, asking that the between solicitor and client.-Counsel, Brett and Gazdar. SOLICITORS, company might be wound up. On behalf of the first petitioner it was Torr, Janeways, Co., for Craven f Ingham, Todmorden ; Stevens, Bawtrie, f said that a compulsory order should be made on his petition, and the Stevens, second petition should be dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the second petitioner must be taken to have had notice of the presentation of PARTNERSHIP-ReceivER-DISPUTE-PRACTICE. the first petition, the same clerk entering both petitions in the sacae In the case of Tucker v. Prior, before Charles, J., on the 7th inst., the office. The company and creditors supported the first petition. On question arose as to appointing a receiver where the existence of a part- behalf of the second petitioner it was submitted that he was a bona fide nership is in dispute. The action was brought by John E. Tucker, and creditor, and the proper course would be to make the order on both asked for a declaration that certain documents and letters created a part. petitions : Buckley on Companies, 4th ed., p. 225. nership between the plaintiff and the defendants, R. C. Prior and his CHARLES, J., made a compulsory order on the first petition, with the wife, William Pyke, and Thomas J. Wickham. This was a motion on usual order as to costs, and dismissed the second petition, without costs.behalf of the plaintiff asking that John Groves Cooper, of Bideford, in the Counsel, Marten, Q.C., and A. Chitty, Seward Brice, Q.O., Eustace Smith, county of Devon, land agent, or some other fit and proper person, on Hilbery, and R. Woodfall; Kenyon Parker. giving security, might be appointed receiver of the Raleigh Estate, near Bideford, in the county of Devon, and the rents and profits trereof, and COMPANY—PETITION—CREDITOR—VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION-ORDER. all other the assets of the partnership mentioned in the endorsement on In the case of the Equestrian and Public Buildings Co. (Limited), before the writ in the action. The property was purchased for building pur-Charles, J., on the 12th inst., the question arose whether, where a poses. For the plaintiff it was said that the defendants excluded the creditor had presented a petition, and a voluntary liquidation had subjeplaintiff from the property, and had mortgaged it without his consent ; quently to the presentation of the petition been decided upon, the property was in danger, and he was entitled to a receiver: Lindley on compulsory or a supervision order should be made. This was a petition Partnership, 4th ed., vol. 2, p. 1012: "The court will appoint a receiver if presented by C. A. Wilkes, a creditor for £1,000, and a shareholder the defendant wrongfully excludes his co-partner from the management of holding ten out of thirty-seven shares issued, asking that the company the partnership affairs." That the partnership was in dispute was no bar might be wound up. There was also a motion to appoint an oficial to the appointment of a receiver where there had been misconduct. Sec. liquidator. The object of the company was to give equestrian and tion 25, sub-section 8, of the Judicature Act, 1873, provided that: “A re dramatic entertainments at the North London Coliseum and Theatre, ceiver may be appointed by an interlocutory order of the court in all cases Dalston. For the petitioner is was said that the petitioner was a creditor in which it shall appear to the court to be just or convenient that such for £1,000, he had made the statutory demand for the money, and the order should be made." The plaintiff here had been excluded from his company had not paid him. Since the petition was presented a resolu. property, and the property had been dealt with and was in jeopardy. tion to wind up the company voluntarily had been passed and confirmed, The defendants denied that there was auy partnership at all. and a provisional liquidator had been appointed; but that was too late, executory contract, and the condition precedent to the formation of the the petitioner was entitled ex debito justitiæ to a compulsory order. A partnership was the completion of the purchase. This had not been com creditor for £65 5s., and one for £40, supported the petition. For the pleted because the plaintiff had not got the purchase-money ready. The company, it was contended that neither as a shareholder, nor as a creditor, mortgagees were in possession of the property and a receiver was ap was the petitioner entitled to an order. Reference was made to the pointed. Where the fact of the partnership was denied it was not the Companies Act, 1862, s. 91, and to the Rich Gold- Washing Co. (11 Ch. D). practice to appoint a receiver. The question of the existence of a partner. 36). . The company wished for a supervision order, and asked that Wilkes's ship was the question to be tried at the hearing. Reference was made to nominee should not be appointed liquidator. Reference was also made to Fairburn v. Pearson (2 Mac. & G. 144) and Chapman v. Beach (1 Jac. & W. sections 51 and 149 of the Companies Act, 1862, and the Horbury Bridge 594). Here three persons in possession alleged that they were sole Co. (11 Ch. D. 109), the Great Western Forest of Dean Coal Consumers Co. (21 owners, and the plaintiff came and said that he was a joint owner with Ch. D. 769). A creditor for £100, and another for £64, also asked for a them. There was no ground for the appointment of a receiver ; the supervision order. A mortgagee asked for leave to continue his forejoint ownership was in dispute, and there was no allegation of miscon- closure action; reference was made to Buckley on Companies (4th ed.): duct. Seton on Decrees, 4th ed., vol. 1, p. 434 : “ If the existence of the p. 202, and Campbell v. The Compagnie Generale de Bellegarde (2 Ch. D. 181); partnership is questioned a receiver will not usually be appointed”: the mortgagee's rights should be protected. Walker v. Hirsch (27 Ch. D. 460). In Lindley on Partnership, 4th ed., CHARLES, J., said he thought it was a case where he ought to make a p. 1012, it was stated that where a partnership was alleged on the one winding-up order, He was satisfied with the position of Wilkes, as a side and denied on the other it was not the practice to appoint a receiver : 1 creditor, supported as he was by two creditors. Two creditors opposed, Peacock v. Peacock (16 Ves. 49). but he had no evidence that the majority of the creditors opposed the CHARLES, J., said that he did not see his way to appoint a receiver. A petition, or that the majority of the creditors were desirous of having the partnerehip was alleged on the one side and denied on the other; that was voluntary winding up continued under the supervision of the court. Two the very question to be tried at the hearing. There was a substantial creditors were in favour of a supervision order being made, but he did not controversy to be settled, and, in his opinion, no special danger was to be see any reason why he should make such an order. He made the usual apprehended to the property. He should follow the practice as stated in compulsory order, and the usual order as to costs. He made no order as Lindley on Partnership (supra), where a partnership was alleged on one side and denied on the other, and should refuse to appoint a receiver. to the mortgagee, except that he might add his costs to his security. He allowed the costs of another petition presented prior to this one, on which The motion would be refused; no order as to costs. -COUNSEL, T. L. no costs had been incurred since the presentation of the second peti: Wilkinson ; Marten, Q.C., and Lemon. or Charles Smale, Bideford ; Hepburn, Son, g Cutliffe. SOLICITORS, Indermaur f 'Brown, tion.—Counsel, Latham, Q.C., and Lemon; Oswald; Job Bradford ; SOLICITORS, ATTACHMENT ORDER Curtis's Co.; W. R. Helmore; Vanderpump & Son; Thomson, Son, $ Brooks. XLI., 5. question arose as to whether a defendant, who, on motion for attachment, 10th, when the appeal of Cooper v. Cooper and others will be in the The judicial business of the House of Lords will be resumed on November for disobedience to an order, raised the technical objection that no time paper for hearing. The present list contains 32 appeals, of which 17 are was specified within which he must comply with the order, was entitled English, two are Irish, and 13 are Scotch appeals. There is only one to the costs of the motion, On the 8th of July, 1877, an order was made I cause standing for judgment, that of Pritchard v. The Mayor of Bangor. It was an Saturday .,19& gen. pa ..28 3 & gen pa Saturday ..10 & gen. pa Mon., Wednsday.. 9{made on interlo utory mots Friday ...16 bkcy apps and apps from Interlocutory apps con Friday -...ll... Mots., adj. sums, & gen pa LEGAL NEWS. Tusdy .... 25 } tinuod and apps from Coan Saturday .,123 Pots, sat causas, atj sums, APPOINTMENTS. Wed. .26 ! Apps from the Chancery Mon...........14 Tues. ......15 General paper Mr. FRANCIS OSBORNE Oates CHUBB, solicitor (of the firm of Welsh, Son, Thursday ...27 if necessary apps from the County Palatine Apps, and Wednesday 16 Thursday ...17 & Chubb), of Wells, has been appointed Clerk to the County Magistrates Ohan Gen List Friday, ....18... Motns adj sums, & gen. pa at that place, in succession to Mr. Edwin Welsh, deceased. Mr. Ohubb Friday .28 Pets., sht causes, & 1j sums, was admitted a solicitor in 1883. Sat.. ..29 Apps from the Chancery Monday ....31 General List Monday ....21 Mr. FreDERICK HARDYMAN PARKER, barrister, has been appointed to act Tuesday, Nov 1 Tues. ..22 General paper as Chief Justice of British Honduras. Mr. Parker is the only son of Mr. Wed. from Thurs William Alexander Parker, formerly Chief Justice of British Honduras. Wednesday 2 orders mada on interlocu. Friday ....25..Mts, adj sms & gen da. He was educated at the University of Edinburgh, and he was called to the tory mots. (sep list) & apps Satrdy ....26 Ş Pets., sit. Caus., adj sums, bar at the Middle Temple in June, 1880. He is Keeper of Records, from general list if required & gen. p.. Provost- Marshal, and Registrar of the Supreme Court of British Honduras, Thirsday County Palatine apps, and Monday 3 if necessary apps fro in the Tuesday ......29 and he has been for some time acting as Attorney-General of the colony. General paper Wednesday 31 Thurs., Dec 1 5 Apps from the Chancery Friday.... 2... Moons. adj sms, & gen. pr. to act as Attorney-General of British Honduras. Mr. Woodward was Monday ...... 7 General List Saturday s Pets, sht. caus, adj. sumos, called to the bar at the Inner Temple in January, 1887. Tuesday.... 8 App. mo's. ex pte-orgl Monday.... 5 Mr. EDWARD Douglas GODWIN, solicitor, of Winchester, has been ap motns - apps. from ords Tuesday.... 6 General paper. pointed Clerk to the Magistrates for that city, in succession to Mr. Wednesday Wednesday 7 Thursday .. (sep list) and apps from 8 Frederick Barnes, resigned. Mr. Godwin was admitted a solicitor in general list if required, Friday .... 9... Motns, a l. sumu. & gen da 1865. He is registrar of the Winchester County Court, and district Thursday ..10 Pets., sht. Caus., & 1j. suns. registrar under the Judicature Acts. Friday ...12 Apps from Chan gen list Monday....12) Tuesday....13 General paper. Wednesday 14 App mtns ex pte-Original Thursday ..15 mtas-apps from ords made Fr day ....16... Motns, adj sums, & gen. pa. O'Connor & Restall), Birmingham. Sept. 29. [Gazette, Oct. il. Weinesday 16 on Interlocutory mins (sep Saturday ...17 Pers., sht. cau.., adj. suns. list), 4 d apps from gea 1 & gea pa GENERAL. list if required Monday .....19 General paper Thursday ...17 The Albany Law Journal, in reviewing a work on “Trade-Mark Cases," Friday ......18 Wednesday 31.1. Mots. adj sumos, & gen pa notices the following decisions :-“ Albany Beef” is not a valid trade Saturday ..19 ; Apps from Chan gon list Any cause intended to be heard as a short mark for canned sturgeon. A label of “old Bachelor Smoking Tobacco,'. Monday. ..21 cause must be so marked in the cause Tues. 22 with a picture of an old bachelor," was held an infringemeat of a label book at least one clear day before the same (App mtns ex pte-original can be put in the paper to be so heard, and of "old Coon Smoking Tobacco," with a picture of a coon," although m tioos-apps from orders the former also stated that it was “Not Old Coon.” On the other hand, Wednesday 23 made on interlocutory mos The necessary papers must be left in court with the judge's officer the day before the "Rising Moon Stove Polish,” with a picture of the moon, was held no (sep list), and apps from cause is to be put into the paper. infringendent of “Rising Sun Stove Polish," with a picture of the sun. genera! list it required Chancery Court, III. MR. JUSTICE CUTTY. .28 Mon., Oct. 24... Motions Tusdy Wednesday 26 Nin wit list motns- Thursday ...21 Mtns contiqued & con wit (sep list), and apps from Friday ......25 bat general list if required Pets, sht. causes, opposed MICHAEL MAS SITTINGS, 1887. County Palatine Apps, and Saturday ...29 pe's, Procedure suuns, & COURT OF APPEAL. Thurs ,Dco. 1 if necessary &PIS srom non 'wit list Mon...........31...Fur cons and non wit list Tusiy, Nov. 1 Saturdy...... 3 Apps from the Chancery Wed 2 Non wit list Saturday ..262 Monday 5 General List Mon, Queen's Bench Division, the Probate, 3 Thursday .28 Apps from Q B fin list Tuesday Divorce, and Admiralty Division (Ad- Tuesdy .... 29 Friday 4..Motos, & non wit list App mtns ex pte-original miralty), and the Queen's Beaca Division App. motas. ex pte-Orgl. Pets, sht. cauces, Procedure mtos-appe sis from orders Sitting in Bankruptcy. morns.- and apps.from ords Saturday 5 sumns, opp.sed pets, & Wednesday 7 made on interlocutory mtns non wit list App. mo's. ex pte-oog. Wednesday 30 made on interlocutory mtns, (sep list) & apps from gen Monday, Oct 24 mots-aod apps from ordes and also apps. froin final Mon., 7..Fur cons and non wit list -bst if required Tues. 8 Thursday Wednesday 9 Non wit list S Bkey apps and apps from Thursday ...10 ) 2 { QB final list it necessary Friday ....11... Motions and non wis list Wed. 26 Monday......12 Pets, sht. Causes, opposed 3 Thursdy....21 Apps from Q B final list Tuesdy ....13 Suturday ... 12 Dets, Procedare sumas, el non wit list Friday 28 mtas---appeals from orders Monday ....14...Fur cons & non wit list App motns ex pte-Orgl Wednesday 14 made on interlocutory mtas Tuesday...... 15 (sep list), and apps from ..31 Weduerday 16 Causes with wits -gen list if required Thursday ...17 Thursday ...15 Friday ...... 18...Mns and non wite list Friday motas--and apps. from ords Thursdy.... 8.. Apps from Q B final list Pets, set causes, Procedure Wednes 2 made on interlocutory mots Haturday ...17 Apps from Chan gen list Saturday ...19/sums, opposed pets, and Mon, .......19 non wit list Tuesday......20 Monday ......21...Fur cons & non wits list App mtns ex pte--original Tuesday ......2.2 mos-PP-sls from orders Weduesday 23 Causes with wits Wednes, .,21 made on interlocutory mas Thursday ...24 ..25...Motns. & non wi: list Final List if necessary Friday motns- & apps from orders gen list if required 5) Pets, sht causes, opposed Wednesday 14{made on interlocutory mots Saturday ...26 pets, Procedure smas, & N.B.-Ludacy Petitions (if any) are taken gen pep in Appeal Court II. on every Monday at Monday ......28...Fur cous & non wit list Tuesday ...... 29 Wednesday 30 Causs with vits and also apps from the final Saturday ..17 HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Thurs., Dec. is 2... Motions & Don wit list list it required. Mon., ... Pe s., sht. Causes, proced are Thursday ..10.. Apps from Q B Final List Tuesday ..20 Ohancery Court, I. Saturday 3sums, opposed puts, and non wit list Monday ..... 5.. Fur cons & non wat list Tuesday.... 6 and a 80 apps from Final Tusdy. .... 25 Wednesday 7 Non pit list Thursday... 8) Thursday ..27 Friday, .... 9.Motions and non wit list mots-and apps. from are taken in Appeal Court I. on specially Friday ...,28... Mots. a tj. sumns, & gen. pa Pers., sht causes, adj sums. pets., Procedure sums. & tory motns and also apps. & gen pa from final list if required Monday ....31 Monday ......12... Fur cons & non wit list Thursday ..17., Apps from Q B fitual list Appeal Court, II. Tuesdy., Nov 1 Tuesday ...13 Wed., 2 Wednesday 14 Non wit list 3) Friday, 4... Mtns, adj smns, and gen pe Thursday ...15) Friday Pets, sht causes, adj sums, ....16...Mots. & non wit list 22 vorce), and the County Palatine and Pets, sht. Causes, procedure Sat, ........ & gen pa pets, Stannaries Courts, Saturday ..17smos, opposed Mon., ...... non wits list App. mtns, ex pte-orgl. Tuesday .... 8 Further considerations : Wednesday 23 made on interlocutory mots mocne - apps. frou ords. Mon., Non wit list made on interlo utors mots Thursd.y ...10 if required (sep list) 2 ... 8 Tusdy .... 16 .... 9 4 Friday Bato, Mon. Tuesday Friday ....11{Q7 Final List it necessary Saturday ...10{ pets, sht. cau-., opposed .... 29 Don wit list .... 15 Mon., ...17 Tues. ..... ...10 Tuesday......20... Non wit list Monday......31... Sitting in chambers ednesday 21...Motioos and non wits list Tues., Nov. 1 WINDING UP NOTICES. 2 General papor Any cause intended to be heard as a short London Gazette.-FRIDAY, October 7. cause must be so marked in the cause Thursdy.... 3 JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. LIMITED IN CHANCERY. same can be put in the paper to be so Saturdy.... & gen pe. Heard, and the necessary papers must “HOME TREASURE" WASHING MACHINE CO, LIMITED.-Petn for winding up, be left in court with the judge's officer Monday.... 7.. Sitting in chambers Tuesday. 8) the day before the cause is to be put in presented Oct 1, directed to be heard before Kay, J., on Oct 29. Chinery & Co, Brabant ct, Gracechurch st, solors for petners HOWE MACHINE CO, LIMITED.-By an order made by Charles, J., dated Sept 28, it was ordered that the company be wound up. Smart, Old Jewry chbrs, solor Friday ....ll.. Motns, adj sums. & gen. pa for petner COUNTY PALATINE OF LANCASTER. LIMITED IN CHANCERY, CITY AND COUNTY FINANCE CO, LIMITED.-Petn for winding up, presented Oct 6, directed to be heard at Chancery Officy, 9, Cook st, Liverpool, on Tuesday, Oct Toes.......... 25 Wed, ...16 General paper. Wednesday 26 General paper 18, at 11. Whitley & Co, Liverpool, solors for petner MONTHLY LIFE ASSURANCE ENDOWMENT AND LOAN CO, LIMITED.-Petn for windThursday ., 27 Fridıy, .....18 .Mtns, adj sums & ren pa Friday .... 28... Motions & adj. sumng ing up, presented Sept 2, directed to be heard at Chancery Office, Liverpool, on Saturday ..29...Sht caus, pets, & adj smns. Sht. caus., pets., adj. sums, Tuesday, Oct 18, at ii. Mearns & Boyle, Liverpool, solors for petner & gen. pa. London Gazette.-TUESDAY, October 11. JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. General pa (acts with wits( LIMITED IN CHANCERY. STANDARD LEAD MINE, LIMITED.-The Vacation Judge has fixed Thursday, Oct Friday, .... 4.. Mtos and adj sms Friday ....25. Mots, adj. sums. & gen. pa 20, at 12, at his chambers, for appointment of_official liquidator WEST INDIES WATER RIGHTS ASSOCIATION, LIMITED.-Petn for winding up, presented Oct 6, directed to be heard before Chitty, J., on Saturday, Oct 29. Tuesdy,... 8 Mon 28.. Sitting in chambers Wednsday.. 9 Foss & Ledsam, Abchurch lane, solors for petner COUNTY PALATINE OF LANCASTER. Wednes. UNLIMITED IN CHANCERY. BRIDGEWATER LOAN SOCIETY.-The Vice-Chancellor has fixed Oct 21, at 2, at the Sat., .........12...Sht caus, pts, & adj sms Friday ...... 2.. Motns, adj smns & gen pa. Registrar's chambers, 2, Clarence st, Manchester, for appointment of official Mond... .14 Sht. causes, pets, adj sums, liquidator Tuesdy..... 15 Sat 3 & gen. pa. General Pa (act with wits) FRIENDLY SOCIETIES DISSOLVED. Wednesday 16 Monday...... 5... Sitting in chambers PERMANENT BENEFIT FRIENDLY SOCIATY, Providence Baptist Chapel, Glemsford, Thur, Tuesday Sudbury, Suffolk. Oct 7 Wednesday 7 General paper, Friday .... 9...Mtns, adj sumns & gen pa Sht. caus, pets, adj. sums. Saturday and gen pa Thursday .. 24 BANKRUPTCY NOTICES. Tuesday ...13 London Gazette.-FRIDAY, October 7. RECEIVING ORDERS. Friday ......16.. Mts, adj sms and gen pa ALLONBY, JOHN, Liverpool, Team Owner. Liverpool. Pet Sept 30. Ord Oct 3 Thurs., Dec. 1! Sht caus, pts, atj sms, ani BAINTON, HENRY, Stanningley, Yorks, Mason. Leeds. Pet Oct 3. Ord Oct 3 Friday 2... Motns. & adj. sums. Mon., ......19..Sitting in chambers Saturday .. 3..Sht, causes, pets, adj sums, BRAY, NICHOLAS, St Kew, Cornwall, Carpenter. Truro. Pet Sept 20. Ord Oct 3 Tuesday ....20.. General paper Mon. 5 Wednesday 21..Mots, aj suns, & gen. pa. CAINE, CHARLES MADRELL, and GEORGE OSCAR CAINE, Liverpool, Pawnbrokers. Tuesday B General Liverpool. Pet Oct 3. Ord Oct 4 paper. CAINE, JANE, Liverpool, out of business. Liverpool. Pet Oct 4. Ord Oct 5 Thursd 8 cause must be so marked in the cause Friday CARBINES. ROBERT RICHARDS, St Ives, Cornwall, Gardener. Truro. Pet Oct 4. ... 9. Mots, & adj. sumns book at least one clear day before the Ord Oct 4 Sat., ..... 10...Sht, caus., ptns. adj. sumps same can be put in the paper to be so Mon. 12 heard, and the necessary papers, in COOK, THOMAS WESLEY, Liverpool, Importer of Provisions. Liverpool. Pet Oot 4. Ord Oct 4 Tuesd. ...... 13 cluding minutes of the proposed judgWed, General paper Cox, JAMES RICHARD, Southsea, Baker. Portsmouth. Pet Oct 4. Ord Oct 4 Thorsday ..15) judge's clerk one clear day before the DALRYMPLE, WILLIAM, Glasgow, Leather Merchant. Leicester. Pet Oct 3. Friday .... 16...Mtos and adj sms cause is to be put into the paper. Ord Oct 3 Saturdy ....17...Sht. caus., pets., adj. sums DUNN, JAMES ALFRED, Rowland gdns, South Kensington. High Court. Pet .19) General paper Oct 3. Ord Oct 3 Tuesday....20 Chancery Court, IV. EDWARDS, WILLIAM, Perry Barr, Staffordshire, out of business. Birmingham. Wednesday 21.. Mots, adj sums & gen pa MR, JUSTICE KEKEWICH, Pet Oct 4. Ord Oct 4 Any cause intended to be heard as a short FRANCIS, THOMAS, Bridgend, Draper. Cardiff. Pet Oct 4. Ord Oct 4 ACTIONS FOR TRIAL will be taken on every cause must be so marked in the cause-book day of the Sittings, from 24th October GEORGE, THOMAS, Ashton under Lyne, Builder. Ashton and Lyne and Stalyat least one clear day before the same can to 21st December, both inclusive. bridge Pet Oct 5. Ord Oct 5 be put in the paper to be so heard, and Special days will on request be appointed GLYNN, FREDERICK, Kidderminster, Builder, Kidderminster. Pet Sept 28. Oid the necessary papers must be left in court for Trial of Actions proceeding in Sept 28 with the judge's officer the day before the Liverpool and Manchester District GRAY, ALFRED, Shaftesbury, Hawker. Salisbury. Pet Oct 3, Ord Oct 3 cause is to be put in the paper. Registries, and assigned to his Lord GRIFFIN, GEORGE, and THOMAS CADWALLADER KENWRICK, Kidderminster, Plumbers. Kidderminster. Pet Sept 29. Ord Sept 29 him for trial only will be taken. Motions in Liverpool and Manchester HAYTER, TOM BAKER, Mile End, Hampshire, Builder. Portsmouth. Pet Oct 3. Oril Oct 3 and other Interlocutory Business from HOPKINS, FREDERICK AUGUSTUS, Station rd, Finchley, Clerk. High Court. Pet Tues........ 25 those District Registries will be taken Oct 4. Ord Oct 4 Wedarsday 26 General paper. on alternate Saturdays commencing HUNT, JAMES HENRY, Birmingham, Electro Plate Manufacturer. Birmingham. Thurs lay ..27 with Liverpool Business on Saturday, Pet Oct 5. Ord Oct 5 Friday .... 28... Mtng, adj sums, & gen. pa. October 29th, ISAACSON, WILLIAM, jun, Depden, Suffolk, Farmer. Bury St Edmunds. Pet Satur lay ..29 5 Sht. caus., pets, adj sums, Oct 5. Ord Oct 5 2 & gen. pa. JESTER, ALFRED ALBERT THOMAS, Walsall, Corn Dealer. Walsall. Pet Oct 5. Ord Oct 5 JONES, EDMUND MATTHEW, Aberkepfig, nr Bridgend, Grocer. Cardiff. Pet Oct 3. Ord Oct 3 NORTH - EASTERN (Lord Coleridge, C.J.). October 27; Durham, Monday, October 31 ; York, Saturday, November 5. Newcastle, Thursday, 1 JONES, JOHN, Ruabon, Denbigh, Printer. Wrexham. Pet Oct 4. Ord Oct 4 SOUTH-EASTERN (Field, J.).-Maidstone, Monday, October 24; Chelms JONES, JOHN LEWIS, Merthyr Tydfil, Tea Dealer. Merthyr Tydfil. Pet Oct 4. ford, Tuesday, November 1; Cambridge, Monday, November 7; Nor- LANE, EDWARD WILLIAM, Torquay, Draper. Exeter. Pet Oct 4. Ord Oct 4 wich, Thursday, November 10. LANSDALE, ELIZA, Blackfriars rd, Mantle Manufacturer. High Court. Pet Oct MIDLAND (Huddleston, B.).—Bedford, Monday, October 24; Leicester, 3. Ord Oct 3 Great Monday, October 31 ; Nottingham, Saturday, November 5 ; Warwick, LEVERITT, RICHARD, Clee, Lincolnshire, Master of Fishing Smack. Grimsby. Pet Oct 3. Ord Oct 3 Monday, November 14. OXFORD (Hawkins, J.).–Oxford, Thursday, October 27; Worcester, Nall MARR, Ouston, Derbyshire, Joiner. Stockport. Pet Oct 5. Ord Oct 6 MANLEY, EDWARD SAMUEL, Church, Lancashire, Draper. Blackburn. Pet Oct Tuesday, November 1; Gloucester, Saturday, November 5 ; Stafford, NETTLETON, JOHN, Stanley, Wakefield, Builder. Wakefield. Pet Oct 4. Ora North and South Wales (Cave, J.).—Chester, Thursday, October 27 ; PARKERT GIBSON, Hartshead, nr Halifax, Currier. Halifax. Pet Oct 3. Ord Swansea, Thursday, November 3. NORTHERN (Day and Grantham, JJ.).— Carlisle, Tuesday, October 25; PEARCE, JOHN, Worksop, Nottinghamshire, Grocer. Sheffield. Pet Oct 4. Ord Manchester, Saturday, October 29; Liverpool, Wednesday, November 16. Oct 4 WESTERN (Wills, J.).—Bristol, Monday, October 24; Exeter, Saturday, ROSSITER, CHARLES THOMAS, Bridgend, Licensed Victualler. Cardiff. Pet Oct 3. Ord Oct 3 RUSSELL, WILLIAM FREDERICK, Wrexham, Boot Maker. Wrexham. Pet Oct Ord Oct 4 SMITH. GEORGE, Kettering, Hair Dresser. Northampton. WARNING TO INTENDING HOUSE PURCHASERS AND LESSEES. —Before purchasing SMITH, WILLIAM, Grand Avenue, Leadenhall Market, Provision Dealer. High ex pent from the Sanitary Engineering te ventilation to us. Victorian West SOUTHWobb, RICHARD, Torquay,t Commission Agent. Exeter. Pet Oct 3. Ord mirs er (Estab. 1875), who also undertake the Ventilation of Offices, &c.-(ADVT.) Oct 3 Mon., Pet Sept 29. Ord STEWART, THOMAS BELL, Carlisle, Ironmonger. Carlisle. Pet Oct 5. Ord ct 5 INDGE. THOMAS COVENTRY, Chard, Cinck Maker. Taunton. Pet Sept 15. Ord Oct 1 JESTER, ALFRED ÁLBERT THOMAS, Wals911, Corn Dealer. Walsall. Pet Oct 5. Pet Ord Oct 5 JONES. JOHN LEWIS, Merthyr Tydfil, Tea Dealer. Merthyr Tydfil. Pet Oct 4. Ord Oct 4 5. Ord Oot 4 KURTZIG, LOUIE, address unknown. High Court. Pet July 18. Ord Oct 4 Oct 3 LEVERITT, RICHARD, Clee, Master of Fishing Smack. Gt Grimsby. Pet Oct 3. Ord Oct 3 MACKENZIE, JOSEPH ANTHONY, and THOMAS SLAID OGILVY, Redland, Bristol, FIRST MEETINGS. Pianoforte Makers. Bristol. Pet Sept 2._Ord Oct 4 MANLEY, EDWARD SAMUEL, Church, Lancs, Draper. Blackburn. Pet Oct 3. ALLERTON, SAMUEL CHAMBERS, Lowestoft, Suffolk, Boat Builder. Oc 15 at Ord Oct 3 12.30. Off Rec, 8, King st, Norwich BANTOFT, PERCY, Kingston upon Hull, Corn Merchant. Oct 17 at 2. Incorpor- NETTLETON, JOHN, Stanley, Wakefield, Builder. Wakefield. Pet Oct 4. Ord NALL, MARK, Buxton, Derby, Joiner. Stockport. Pet Oct 8. Ord Oct 5 ated Law Society, Lincoln's inn bldgs, Bowlalley lane, Hull BARRETT, WILLIAM, Kidderminster, Shopkeeper. Oct 14 at 12.45. Miller Corbet, Oct 4 solor. Kidderminster PARGETER, JAMES, Clapham rd, Provision Dealer. High Court. Pet Sept 30. BICKLEY, THOMAS HENRY, Leicester, out of business. Oct 14 at 12.30. 28, Friar Ord Oct 5 lane. Leicester PARKER, GIBSON, Hartshead, nr Halifax, Currier. Halifax. Pet Oct 3. Ord BLYTH, WILLIAM FRANCIS, Victoria pk sq, Bethnal green, Surgeon. Oct 14 at 12. Oct 3 33, Carey st, Lincoln's inn PARKER, WILLIAM, Ropsley, nr Grantham, Builder. Nottingham. Pet Aug 29. DALRYMPLE, WILLIAM, Glasgow, Leather Merchant. Oct 18 at 2.30. 28, Friar Ord Ost 4 lane, Leicester PEARCE, JOHN, Worksop, Nottingham, Grocer. Sheffield. Pet Oct 8. Ord GLYNN, FREDERICK, Kidderminster, Builder. Oct 14 at 12. Roden & Dawes, Oct 4 solors, Kidderminster PERRIS, ALBERT, Birmingham, Clothier, Birmingham. Pet Sept 2. Ord Oct 3 Sept 2. Ord Oct 1 Ord Oct 3 Pet Sept 19 Ord Oct 5 1. Ord Oct 3 Rhyl Pet Sept 29. Ord Oct 5 SOUTHWOOD, RICHARD, Torquay, Commission Agent. Exeter. Pet Oct 3. Ord Oct 5 STYLES, ELIZABETH, Rugby, Licensed Victualler. Coventry, Pet Oct 3. Ord 8, King st, Norwich Oct 4) SUGAR, MAX, Holborn circus, Fancy Goods Dealer. High Court. Pet July 11. Ord Oct 5 Ord Oct 5 on Tyre. Pet Oct 5. Ord Oct 6 Oct 4 Oct 3 Birmingham WILLICOMBE, ALFRED, John st, Adelphi, Colliery Agent. High Court. Pet Aug 10. Ord Oct 3 WILSON, JOHN HENRY, Sutton Mill, nr Kildwick, Yorks, Tailor. Bradford. Pet Oct 4 Ord Oct 5 WOOD, E, St Thomas rd, Finsbury pk, Builder. High Court. Pet Apr 13. Ord Oct 3 YOUNGS, CHARLES, East Dereham, Coal Merchant. Norwich. Pet Sept 12 Ord Oct 5 The following amended notice is substituted for that published in the London Gazette of September 30. Off DAVIES, THOMAS, sen, Newport, Mon, Forgeman. Newport, Mon. Pet Sept 27. Ord Sept 27 ADJUDICATION ANNULLED. DEAN. SAMUEL HARRISON, Chester, Saddler. Chester. Adjud June 24. Annul Sept 15 London Gazette.–TUESDAY, Oct. 11. RECEIVING ORDERS. Ord Oct 8 chbrs, Bristol BLACKBURN, CHARLES, Sheffield, Joiner. Sheffield. Pet Sept 28. Ord Oct 6 12. Queen's Head Cafe, Bangor BOOTH. EUSTACE ROBERT, Bishopsgate st Witbin, Oil Merchant. High Court. BUTLER, THOMAS, Cranborne, Dorsetshire, Farmer. Poole. Pet Oct 6. Ord Oct 6 BUTTERWORTH, EDWARD JACKSON, Manchester, Bedding Manufacturer. Man chester. Pet Oct 8. Ord Oct 8 ADJUDICATIONS. DAVIS, THOMAS HENRY, and GEORGE LISTER LAIRD, Liverpool, Paint ManufacALLAN, JOHN NIXON, Scarborough, Grocer. Scarborough. Pet Sept 27. Ord turers. Liverpool. Pet Oct 7. Ord Oct 7 ECCLES, JAMES, York, Offal Dealer. York. Pet (ct 8. Ord Oct 8 ELVISH, FREDERICK, Kirby Cross, nr Colchester, Engine Driver. Colchester. Pet Oct 8. Ord Oct 8 ENNEVER, WILLIAM, Woburn mews East, Russell sq, Carman. High Court. Pet Oct 6 HOLMES, ROBERT, Forest hall, Northumberland, Builder. Newcastle on Tyne. Pet Sept 24. Ord Oct 8 HORNER, JAMES READ. Salterhebble, nr Halifax, Chemical Manufacturer. Halifax. Pet Oct 6. Ord Oct 6 Pet Aug 16. HUNT. CORNELIUS, Bournemouth, Provision Dealer, Poole. Pet Oct 8. Ord Oct 8 Oct 8. Ord Oct 8 Oct 5 Oct 7 7. Ord Oct 7 Oct 3 |