as any great improvement on the form adopted by Davidson, and Key and Elphinstone. Division by the number of clients only seems to be absurd unless a provision is added for drawing their names out of a hat, each partner taking every other name. And it seems to be unwise to circularize the clients, who may think it a favourable opportunity for going to some solicitor other than either partner, or for taking the papers into their own hands. At present it appears to us that Mr. Jarman's first-mentioned form affords the best basis for a clause of the kind we desire, but in the course of some experience of this kind of deed we do not remember to have seen this clause used or suggested. It has one manifest defect, inasmuch as it leaves open the question of the kind or mode of division of the new business which is to be adopted. We shall be glad if our readers can help us to amend this defect. THE LAW OF GIFTS INTER VIVOS. VII. Equitable interest in chose in action. Where a chose in action of either class is vested in trustees, the equitable owner can make a valid gift of the equitable interest by an assignment to the donee of which notice is given to the trustees: Bridge v. Bridge (16 Beav. 315). Gifts made by declaration of trust.-As already pointed out, there are two methods by which a man can carry his intention of making a gift into effect: he may transfer either the legal or the equitable ownership to the donee. Where the donor is the legal owner of the thing given, he may constitute himself or some other person a trustee, either by parol, in which we include his acts, or by a formal declaration of trust. If he effectually constitutes himself a trustee he may retain some control over the thing given (Wheatley v. Parr, 1 Keen, 551; Vanderberg v. Palmer, 4 K. & J. 204) without preventing the gift from being effectual. The cases are most conflicting, but the general conclusions to be drawn from them are First. That if A. attempts to make a gift to B., by transfer of the property to B., which fails, owing to the transfer being ineffectual, he has not constituted himself a trustee for B. Second. That A. may constitute himself a trustee for B. by unequivocal words or actions. Third. That where A., being the legal owner of property, attempts to make a gift to B., by transferring the property to C. on trust for B., the gift fails if the transfer of the property is not complete. Fourth. That where A. is the equitable owner of property vested in C., a direction to C. to hold it on trust for B. operates as a valid gift to B. Whether an imperfect assignment can be construed as a declararation of trust.—There has been much difference of opinion as to whether, where the intention to make a gift is clear, but the gift fails, owing to the transfer of the property being imperfect, the attempted assignment can be construed as a declaration of trust in favour of the donee by the intending donor. The law, however, is now settled that this is not the case. See the remarks of Turner, LJ., in Milroy v. Lord (4 De G. F. & J., at p. 274, cited suprà); and of Jessel, M.R., in Richards v. Delbridge (18 Eq., at p. 13, cited supra). Imperfect assignment or property construed as declaration of trust.—The following is a summary of the decisions on this point: "Even where the deed is invalid as a transfer of the legal title, it may, as in the present case, fasten a trust on the property which it purports to assign": per Stuart, V.C. (Parnell v. Hingston, 3 Sm. & Giff., at p. 346). This dictum was not necesBary, as the Vice-Chancellor was of opinion that the assignment of the property was sufficient. A., by voluntary deed, assigns, inter alia, "all her personal property" to B., with a power of attorney authorizing him "to sue for and recover the same." At the date of the deed A. possessed certain promissory notes. At B.'s death the notes were found in his possession, but not indorsed to him, and there was no evidence that they had been delivered to him by A. Held, that the deed operated as a declaration of trust of the notes by A. in favour of B: Richardson v. Richardson (3 Eq. 686). Memorandum signed by A. :-"I hereby give and make over" (a specified India bond) "to B.," without handing over the bond. Held, to operate as a declaration of trust: Morgan v. Malleson (10 Eq. 475). Deed poll by a husband:-"I do hereby settle, assign, and transfer unto my wife, as if she were a single woman,' several leasehold houses. Held, to operate as a declaration of trust: Baddeley v. Baddeley (9 Ch. D. 113), following Grant v. Grant (34 Beav. 623, stated suprà). See also Fox v. Hawkes (13 Ch. D. 822) to the same effect, Prior to the Married Women's Property Act, 1882, a husband could not at law make a gift to his wife, but where he made a clear, irrevocable gift to her it used to be considered that he constituted himself a trustee for her: Mews v. Mews (15 Beav. 529), Grant v. Grant (34 Beav. 625), but these decisions would not now be followed: Moore v. Moore (L. R. 18 Eq. 474), Hayes v. Alliance Co. (8 L. R. Ir. 149), Re Breton (17 Ch. D. 416); see in Grant v. Grant as to the effect of wedding presents made to a lady. Possibly in some of these cases the gift might have been supported without having regard to the doctrine under consideration. of trust.-Assignment by deed by A. to S. of shares which passed Imperfect assignment of property not construed as a declaration only by entry in the bank books on trust for T. At that time S. held a general power of attorney authorizing him to transfer A.'s shares. After the assignment A. gave to S. a further power authorizing him to receive the dividends on the shares. S. received the dividends by virtue of the power, and paid them to T. It was held (1) that A. did not intend to make himself a trustee, but to constitute S. a trustee; (2) That no valid trust was constituted in S., for although he held a power of attorney, under which he might have vested the shares in himself, he had not done so, and was not bound to do so without directions from A.: Milroy v. Lord (4 De G. F. & J. 264). Parol declaration of trust.-The following circumstances have been held to amount to a parol declaration of trust by the donor, or to the creation of a trust in another person in favour of a third person : A. directs in writing B. to purchase an annuity in France for the benefit of C. with A.'s money. The annuity was purchased, but as C. was a married woman it was purchased in A.'s name. A., on hearing of this, sends a power of attorney to B., authorizing him to transfer the annuity to C. B. acts on the power, in ignorance of the testator's death. The transfer made under this circumstance was valid by the law of France. Held that, without regard to the provisions of the French law, A. had sufficiently declared himself a trustee for C.: Ex parte Eye (18 Ves. 140). A transfer by the donor of money standing at her own account at a bank to the account of herself as trustee for B., coupled with a receipt given to her in that form by the bank (the marginal note is incorrect) : Wheatley v. Purr (1 Keen, 551). A trustee adds his money to trust moneys, invests the aggregate sum, and treats the investment as trust property: Thorpe v. Owen (5 Beav. 224); Gray v. Gray (2 Sim. N. S. 273); in both of which cases the trustee, after the investment was made, declared that he intended it as a gift. On the purchase of land by the trustees of a marriage settlement the husband, who was tenant for life, added some money of his own to the money in the hands of the trustees: Ouseley v. Anstruther (10 Beav. 461). A testator appoints B. his executor. Shortly before his death he draws a cheque for £900 in B.'s favour on a sheet of paper and writes on the same sheet: "A. £200, B. £200, executorship fund £500." Held, a valid trust for A., the cheque being cashed in the testator's lifetime: Tate v. Leithead (Kay, 658). Parol declaration of trust by third party, to whom money was handed by person in extremis: Peckham v. Taylor (31 Beav. 250). A partner in a bank opens an account in the books of his firm, "Mrs. A., for the education of B., C., and D.": Stapelton v. Stapelton (14 Sim. 186). V., a merchant in China, directs his correspondents in London to transfer £1,000 from his tea account and to employ it in exchange transactions for the benefit of his children. Subsequently he declines to give any opinion as to the investments of the fund, "as I consider myself to have no control over the fund, as it belongs to my children": Vanderberg v. Palmer (4 K. & J. 204). On the other hand, no trust was constituted in the following cases: Where A. directed his bankers to carry over certain funds to the account of himself and other persons as trustees for his wife, and after her death for his son, and the funds were carried over accordingly. It was proved that the transfer was made with an intent to avoid legacy duty. A. died shortly afterwards. Alexander, C.B., said: "It is clearly a gift inter vivos. I cannot consider it as a binding appropriation. The appropriation was made with a fraudulent intent, and would not have bound A.: Gaskell v. Gaskell (2 Y. & J. 502). A testatrix drew a cheque on her bankers for £150 in favour of A., directing him to apply that sum, or so much of it as might be necessary, to make up to a legatee the difference in value between a legacy of £100, which she had given by her will, and the price of a £100 share in a certain railway. The cheque was cashed in the lifetime of the testatrix. Held, no trust (Hughes v. Stubbs, 1 Ha. 476), the court being of opinion that the arrangement was to stand on the same footing as a will. A. directed his agents to purchase £4,000 stock in the names of himself and his wife in trust for his infant son. The agents made the purchase in the joint names, but without any trust expressed, because, as they informed A., the bank declined to state a trust in their books. A. did nothing more except receiving the dividends down to his decease. Held, that no trust was created, on the ground that, whatever A.'s original intention may have been, he was content that the stock should remain under his absolute dominion Smith v. Warde (15 Sim. 56). Where a farmer's wife, with his sanction, deposited the surplus produce of the butter, &c., with a firm in her own name. The husband constantly called it "his wife's fund." Held, that this did not amount to the husband having deprived himself of all control over the property, and that, therefore, he was not a trustee for her. Some weight was given to language used by him on his death-bed, which shewed that he did not believe himself to have made a gift: Mews v. Mews (15 Beav. 529). A., after depositing in a savings bank to the full extent allowed, made further deposits in the names of his sister and himself as trustee for her. Held, that no trust was constituted, as the intention was only to evade the provisions of the Act under which the bank was constituted: Field v. Lonsdale (13 Beav. 78). Note in a memorandum book: I intend to make certain investments, and I intend to leave them, at my death, to A. An account of the investments, "from the period that I determined thus to appropriate the money," in the testator's handwriting was found after his death. Held that "I intend to leave "" created no trust: Re Glover (2 J. & H. 186). A. gives to B. a power of attorney to sell Consols, and directs him to hold the proceeds on certain trusts, but B. did not act on the power in A.'s lifetime. Held, that there was no trust, as the money did not get into B.'s hands during A.'s lifetime, and as A. might have revoked the power at any time before it was acted on: Peckham v. Taylor (31 Beav. 250). A father puts a cheque, paid to him by a stranger, into the hands of his baby, saying, "I give this to Baby, It is his own, and he may do what he likes with The cheque was not presented during the father's lifetime. Held, that no trust was created: Jones v. Lock (1 Ch. 25). The consent given by a married woman before commissioners for the transfer and payment to her husband of sums of stock and money standing in court to her separate account does not operate as a declaration of trust, and she can revoke her consent at any time before transfer or payment: Peafold v. Mould (4 Eq. 562). it." CORRESPONDENCE. THE LIABILITY OF TRUSTEES. To the Editor of the Solicitors' Journal.] Sir,-Referring to your remarks in the "Current Topics" of your journal for the 17th inst., and the letter of your correspondent, "B.," on the subject, I beg to enclose a clause, which, I think, would meet the suggested difficulties. CHAS. C. DEANE. 19, Castle-street, Liverpool, September 20. The following is the clause referred to:No trustee of this my will shall be answerable or accountable for joining in or doing any act by which his co-trustees, or the acting trustee for the time being, may be enabled to receive any moneys or securities belonging to or forming part of my trust estate nor for the deficiency or depreciation in value of any stocks, shares, mortgages, or other securities, in or on which any part of the trust funds may, for the time being, be invested, except the same shall happen through his own wilful default; and I accordingly direct and declare that the rule of the High Court, as to the amount which trustees may lend on mortgage, and their duties in relation thereto, shall not apply have the fullest discretion, not only as to the amount which they may to the trustees of this my will, but, on the contrary, that they shall consider it desirable to advance on mortgage securities, but as to the nature and position of such securities, and the assistance (if any) which they may decide to avail themselves of in connection therewith, and that none of them shall, by any means, or in any court, be made r sponsible for any loss which may be sustained by my estate by reason of any bona fide act [query, omission] or error of judgment on the part of any one or more of my trustees. CASES BEFORE THE VACATION JUDGE. HUSBAND AND WIFE-COVENANT NOT TO MOLEST-MOLESTATION-SUM- On In the case of De Bensaude v. De Bensaude, before Charles, J., on the 21st inst., the question arose whether the court should grant an interim injunc tion restraining a husband from molesting his wife in breach of a covenant, or whether she should not rather seek her remedy in a police court. This was a motion on behalf of the plaintiff, Mrs. De Bensaude, known on the stage as Miss Violet Cameron, to restrain the defendant, Mr. David De Bensaude, her husband, from committing a breach of a covenant contained in a deed made on the 7th of July, 1887, between the parties, plaintiff in her professional means of livelihood, or otherwise, for a year. whereby the defendant covenanted not to molest or interfere with the The parties were married in 1884, and there was issue one child. On the 7th of July, 1887, the plaintiff and defendant executed a deed staying certain proceedings in the Divorce Court, the Queen's Bench Division, and the American courts on the understanding that the parties should live apart for a year, the defendant should not molest the plaintiff, and the plaintiff's earnings should be for her separate use. The defendant also signed two receipts for two sums of £750 and £350 in full discharge of all claims on the Earl of Lonsdale for damages and costs. the 9th of July counsel mentioned the case in the Divorce Court, saying that the defendant had inquired carefully into the case, and had come to the conclusion that his position was founded on statements exaggerated or untrue, the relations between the parties had been indiscreet, but he was now fully, honestly, and firmly convinced that the relations were not immoral, and he withdrew his petition. The plaintiff's petition was also withdrawn. The defendant also wrote to petition. Evidence was given on behalf of the plaintiff that the defendLord Lonsdale expressing regret at causing him annoyance by the ant since the 7th of July pursued a course of molestation. On the 27th of July be called at her house and created a disturbance, ringing the bell and knocking for some time. The defendant did not contribute a penny the purpose of getting her earnings. On the 3rd of August the defendant to the plaintiff's support, and it was alleged that the molestation was for followed the plaintiff to Malmesbury. On the 6th of September he threatened to send a notice to all the managers of theatres telling them not to employ her. On the 8th of August a summons, taken out dismissed on the ground that the case did not come within section 16. under the Metropolitan Police Act at the Marylebone Police Court, was The defendant said that he had executed the deed without having legal advice, and on the assurance that there was no criminal intercourse between Lord Lonsdale and the plaintiff; that he afterwards found that on the 15th of May, 1887, the plaintiff gave birth to an illegitimate child, adultery with Lord Lonsdale. All he desired was to put a stop to this and that at the time of his executing the deed she was living in conduct. On behalf of the defendant it was contended that the plaintiff should have applied to a police magistrate for protection under the Summary Jurisdiction Act; she could not get the help of a court of equity as she had not come with clean hands. The defendant had not molested the plaintiff, he had taken the reasonable means of a husband to protect his wife. In the first place the deed was not binding: Evans v. Edmunds (22 L. J. C. P. 211), Evans v. Carington (30 L. J. Ch. 365), Gandy v. Gandy (7 Prob. D. 77). Secondly, assuming that the deed was binding, there had been no molestation within the meaning of the covenant: Fearon v. Lord Aylesford (14 Q. B. D. 805). The question was, had the acts been done to vex and annoy, or with the object of severing the intimacy: Sanders v. Rodway (16 Beav. 207.) All the acts prior to the 7th of July, 1887, were irrelevant to the case. This was not a case for an interlocutory order, and the motion should be dismissed. CHARLES, J., said that he took into consideration that he was not hearing the cause, was not deciding the true construction of the deed except in one sense, nor was he deciding whether the deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation. The defendant would have an opportunity of raising that question in his statement of defence. For the purposes of that day he assumed that the deed was a valid and binding deed. By that deed the defendant covenanted not in any wise to molest or interfere He came to the conclusion that there was a prima facie case made out of with the plaintiff in her professional means of livelihood or otherwise. otherwise. While saying that he did not overlook the affidavit of the molestation of the plaintiff in her professional means of livelihood and defendant. He was disposed to agree with Mr. Kisch, in considering the question whether he should grant an interlocutory injunction, that he ought not to regard acts done before the 7th of July, 1887, and ought to confine himself to a consideration of the acts done since that date up to the present time. Affidavits had been filed since the notice of motion setting out a vast number of grievances on both sides of the most contradictory nature, but he came to no decision as to these. Looking at the defendant's answer to the original affidavits in support of the motion, he was not satisfied. Taking the acts of molestation of the 27th of July and the 3rd of August, and especially the threats of the defendant to prevent the plaintiff from earning her living by acting on the stage-looking at these acts he could not say that the defendant had satisfactorily met the plaintiff's allegations. He therefore decided for the purposes of that day, and assuming the deed to be valid, to grant an interim injunction until the trial or further order.-COUNSEL, Marten, Q.C., and Ryland; Henry Kisch. SOLICITORS, Lewis & Lewis; Seaborne & Co. LEGAL NEWS. OBITUARY. Mr. ROBERT FURLEY, solicitor, F.S.A., died at Ashford, on the 9th inst., at the age of seventy-eight. Mr. Furley was the third son of Mr. Robert Furley, of Canterbury, and was born in 1809. He was admitted a solicitor about the year 1833, and he practised for many years at Ashford, where he had a large business. He was for several years clerk to the county magistrates and to the Ashford Burial Board. He was solicitor and secretary to the Ashford Cattle Market Co. He was formerly clerk to the Ashford Improvement Commissioners, and he was the first clerk to the Ashford Board of Health. He was also local secretary at Ashford to the Kent Fire and Life Assurance Co. Mr. Furley retired from practice about eighteen years ago, and he was shortly afterwards appointed a magistrate for the county of Kent. He was the author of a "History of the Weald of Kent.' Mr. Furley leaves one son and two daughters. He was buried on the 14th inst. Mr. JAMES INGLIS, solicitor, died at Colchester on the 30th ult. Mr. Inglis was born in 1819. He served his articles with his uncle, the late Mr. William Mason, and he was admitted a solicitor about the year 1843. He practised for many years at Colchester, where he was formerly a member of the firm of Howard, Inglis, & Keeling Mr. William Howard, his former partner, was formerly clerk to the county magistrates, and the Commissioners of Taxes, and Mr. Inglis was himself for several years treasurer of the Colchester Union. Mr. Inglis retired from practice about six years ago. He was unmarried. APPOINTMENTS. Mr. WILLIAM BEER, solicitor, of Kingsbridge, has been appointed Clerk to the Kingsbridge and Dodbrooke United District School Board. Mr. Beer was admitted a solicitor in 1885. Mr. JOHN BOWLING, solicitor (of the firm of Bowling & Hirst) of Leeds, has been appointed Clerk to the Methley Local Board. Mr. Bowling is also solicitor to the Horsforth Local Board, and Official Receiver in Bankruptcy for the Leeds District. He was admitted a solicitor in 1880. Mr. THOMAS WILLIAMS, Solicitor, of Neath and Pontardawe, has been appointed Registrar of Births and Deaths for the Neath District, in succession to the late Mr. Martin Scale. Mr. Williams was admitted a solicitor in 1881. Mr. RICHARD WILLIAM SHEPSTONE GIDDY, barrister, has been appointed to act as Legal Adviser to the Government of the Cape Colony. Mr. Giddy was called to the bar at the Inner Temple in May, 1878. Messrs. JUBB, BOOTH, & HELLIWELL, solicitors, of Halifax, have been appointed Solicitors to the Halifax Trade Protection Society. Mr. ALFRED PROCTER, Solicitor, of York, has been appointed Solicitor to the York Starr-Bowkett Building Society. Mr. Procter was admitted a solicitor in 1882. Mr. JOHN TOMLINSON HIBBERT, barrister, has been appointed a Commissioner under the Local Government Boundaries Act, 1887. Mr. Hibbert is the eldest son of Mr. Elijah Hibbert, of Oldham, and was born in 1824. He was educated at St. John's College Cambridge, and he was called to the bar at the Inner Temple in Easter Term, 1849. Mr. Hibbert was Secretary to the Local Government Board from 1872 till 1874, and again from 1880 till 1883, and Financial Secretary to the Treasury from 1883 till 1885, and Secretary to the Admiralty from January to July, 1886. Lord EDMUND GEORGE FITZMAURICE, barrister, has been appointed a Commissioner under the Local Government Boundaries Act, 1887. Lord E. Fitzmaurice is the second son of the fourth Marquis of Lansdowne, and was born in 1846. He was educated at Westminster, and at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he graduated in the first class of the classical tripos in 1868, and he was called to the bar at Lincoln's-inn in Michaelmas Term, 1871. He was M.P. for Calne in the Liberal interest from 1868 till 1885, and he was Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs from 1883 till 1885. Lord E. Fitzmaurice is a Magistrate and Deputy Chairman of Quarter Sessions for Wiltshire. PARTNERSHIP DISSOLVED. SAMUEL WILKINSON, RICHARD WILLIAM GILLESPIE, and CHARLES WILKIN SON, Solicitors, Walsall. Sept. 6. The said Samuel and Charles Wilkinson will continue to practise as solicitors, at their offices in Bridge-street, Walsall, under the style of Wilkinson & Son, and the said Richard William Gillespie will hereafter practise as a solicitor on his own account, at Globe-chambers, Bridge-street, Walsall. [Gazette, Sept. 16 ] GEORGE COPPLESTONE RICE and ALLAN BURNETT, solicitors (Rice & Burnett). Devereux-buildings, Devereux-court, Strand, London. Sept. 16. [Gazette, Sept. 20.] GENERAL. On days when Mr. Justice Charles is not sitting either at judges' chambers or in court, applications of an urgent character arising during the vacation may be addressed to him at his private residence, Gartlett, Clarendon-road, Watford, Herts. At a meeting of the Watch Committee of the Leeds Corporation on the 16th inst., a communication was read from the Home Secretary stating that he had under consideration the manner in which the punishment of birching was at present carried out in the case of youthful offenders, and suggesting that the rod used for children under ten should be lighter than that used in the case of older offenders, and that if there was reason to suppose that a child was in delicate health a medical man should be consulted as to the propriety of the punishment being carried out. We are requested to state that the late firm of Hickin & Graham, of 29, Lincoln's-inn-fields, was dissolved by mutual consent on the 1st of January last, and that Mr. William Graham has not, and never had, any connection with or interest in the business since carried on by Messrs. Hickin & Fox alone at the same address. WINDING UP NOTICES. London Gazette.-FRIDAY, September 16. JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. LIMITED IN CHANCERY. CONDENSED WORT AND BREWING MEAL CO, LIMITED.-By an order made by Kekewich, J., dated Sept 10, it was ordered that the company be wound up. Philbrick & Free, New Broad st, solors for petners CUNARD CYCLE CO. LIMITED.-By an order made by Kekewich, J., dated Sept 7, it was ordered that the company be wound up. Smith & Co, Bread st, agents for Stirk & Brewer, Wolverhampton, solors for petner EYRE ARMS HOTEL CO, LIMITED.-Kay, J., has fixed Tuesday, Sept 27, at 12, at his chambers, as the time and place for the appoiniment of an official liquidator COUNTY PALATINE OF LANCASTER. ALEXANDRA HOTEL ordered that the solor for petner LIMITED IN CHANCERY LIVERPOOL CO, LIMITED. By an order, dated Sept 6, it was BRADFORD DISTRICT STEAM TRAMWAYS, LIMITED.-Petn for winding up, pre- EQUESTRIAN AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS CO, LIMITED.-Petn for winding up, presented Sept 19, directed to be heard before Charles, J., Sept 28. Curtis & Hilton, 7, Union court, Old Broad st, solors for petner HOWE MACHINE CO, LIMITED.-Petn for winding up, presented Sept 16, directed to be heard before Charles, J., Sept 28. Smart, 9, Old Jewry chmbrs, Old Jewry, solor for petner MIDDLESEX MANUFACTURING CO, LIMITED. - Petn for winding up, presented Sept 16, directed to be heard before the Vacation Judge, Sept 22. Raphael, 47, Moorgate st, solor for petner WEST OF ENGLAND PAPER MILLS CO, LIMITED.-By an order made by Kekewich, J., dated Sept 9, it was ordered that the company be wound up. Bradley, Lombard st, solor for petner CREDITORS' NOTICES. UNDER 22 & 23 VICT. CAP. 35. London Gazette.-FRIDAY, September 16. beche & Addenbrooke, Sutton Coldfield Rundle & FAWCETT, ANN, Wakefield. Oct 8. Stewart & Sons, Wakefield Frome st, E.C HUTCHINSON, FRANCIS, Woburn pl, Surgeon. Nov. 14. Tamplin & Co, Fenchurch IMESON, ANNE, Park st, Grosvenor sq. Oct 31. Gilliam Slack, Guilford st, W.C LEACH, ELIZABETH, Lamphey, Pembroke. Oct 25. Eaton-Evans & Williams, Haverfordwest MURRAY, Dr. GUSTAVUS CHARLES PHILIP, Great Cumberland pl. Oct 25. ARMITSTEAD, ISABELLA, Seaforth, nr Liverpool. Nov 1. Miller & Co, Liverpool Nov 1. Wigin, Leeds Kent, Lincoln's inn fields COLEMAN, GEORGE, Tottenham rd, Kingsland, Coffee House Keeper. Oct 31. COLLIER, JOHN, Duston, Licensed Victualler. Oct 21. Pugh & Phillips, Northampton CROSS, JAMES, Badminton, Woollen Draper. Nov 1. E Witchell & Sons, Stroud EYRE, FREDERICK EDWIN, Dursley, Gloucester, Esq. Oct 21. White & Sons, HARE, LYDIA, Heigham, Norwich. Oct 31. Sadd & Co., Norwich HEAD, Sir FRANCIS SOMERVILLE, Newberries, nr Watford, Bart. Nov 15. HILLS, ELEANOR, Gloucester pl. Nov 1. Meredith & Co., New sq IVINSON, JANE, Bryanston st, Portman sq. Nov 10. Pooley, Sloane st SAMUEL CLARK SMITH, Leamington, Bankers. Warwick. Pet Sept 9. Ord HESSE, EMIL, Kent ter, Regent's pk. High Court. Pet Aug 30. Ord Sept 14 Sept 13 HUNT, JAMES, Barrow in Furness, Farmer. Ulverston and Barrow in Furness. Pet Sept 12 Ord Sept 12 JACKSON, EBENEZER, Cheapside, Auctioneer. High Court. Pet Sept 14. Ord JACKSON, JOHN, St Albans, Saddler. St Albans. Pet Sept 13. Ord Sept 13 MUSGRAVE, CHARLES, Wildsworth, Lincoln, Farmer. Lincoln. Pet Sept 13. Ord NYREN. THOMAS BROWN, Lower Broughton, nr Manchester, Manufacturers' OKELY, CHARLES, Beresford st, Walworth, Tobacconist. High Court. Pet 3 pt PITT, CHARLES, Bournemouth, Ironmonger. Poole. Pet Sept 12. Ord Sept 12 14 ROSE, GEORGE, Horncastle, Lincolnshire, Higgler. Lincoln. Pet Sept 13. Ord WRIGHT, ROBERT, Newport, Mon, Tobacconist. Newport, Mon. Pet S. pt 14. ABERCROMBIE, EDGAR, Market pl, Oxford st. Brass Manufacturer. Sept 23 at 12. LONGSDON, DAVID, St Leonard's on Sea, Gent. Oct 15. Tadman, Gray's inn place ALLEN, HENRY, Exeter, General Merchant. Sept 26 at 11. Castle of Exete“, MATON, CHARLES, Kew, Builder. Nov 1. Gush & Co, Finsbury circus MICHELL, JOHN, St Albans, Hertford, Retired Coachbuilder. Dec 1. Annesley' St Albans MILLER. GEORGE FRANCIS, Didsbury, Lancaster. Nov 18. Cunliffe & Co, Manchester MULLINER, THOMAS, Prestwich, Lancaster. Oct 31. Barrow & Smith, Manchester NOURSE, ELIZABETH, Leeds. Nov 1. Clarke & Son, Leeds OLIVER. HENRY, Essex st, Islington, Furrier. Nov 1. Croft, Mildmay chmbrs, WADDELL, ROBERT FOSTER, Egremont, Cumberland, Engine Fitter. Sept 28. WALCOTT, Sir STEPHEN, Grange pk, Ealing. Nov 30. Sadler, Golden sq WINTER, JAMES, Wardour st, Soho, Upholsterer. Nov 30. Sadler, Golden sq WISEMAN, ELIZABETH, New Cross rd, Hatcham. Oct 31. Frank Richardson & Frank Richardson & Hillearys & Layard, Fenchurch bdgs WISKAR, MARY, Oxford rd, Finsbury pk. Nov 2. Layton & Co, Budge row BANKRUPTCY NOTICES. London Gazette.-FRIDAY, September 16. RECEIVING ORDERS. AINSWORTH, EDWARD HARRISON, address unknown, Gent. High Court. Pet ALLEN, HENRY, Exeter, Merchant. Exeter. Pet Sept 12. Ord Sept 12 BETTELLEY, JOSEPH, Hanley, Earthenware Manufacturer. Hanley, Burslem, and Tunstall. Pet Sept 7. Ord Sept 9 BISHOP, GEORGE, and HOBATIO WHITE, Boscombe, nr Bournemouth, Builders. Poole. Pet Sept 14. Ord Sept 14 BLAKE, JAMES, Manchester, Boiler Maker. Manchester. Pet Aug 30. Ord Sept 14 BLYTH, WILLIAM FRANCIS, Victoria pk sq, Bethnal Green, Surgeon. High Court. Pet Aug 30. Ord Sept 12 BRIERLEY, JAMES, Manchester, Baker. Manchester. Pet Sept 13. Ord Sept 13 BROWN, CHARLES THOMPSON, South Shields, Auctioneer. Newcastle on Tyne. Pet Sept 3. Ord Sept 13 CARTMEL, WILLIAM CHARLES, West Derby, nr Liverpool, Timber Merchant Liverpool. Pet Sept 2. Ord Sept 12 COOPER, DANIEL, Compton, nr Wolverhampton, Butcher. Wolverhampton. Pet Sept 14. Ord Sept 14 Cox, JOHN WALTER, Deptford, Builder. Greenwich. Pet Sept 13. Ord Se, t 13 DAVIS, SOLOMON, Brighton, Boot Dealer. Brighton. Pet Sept 14. Ord Sept 14 DRAY, WILLIAM, Twickenham, Coppersmith. High Court. Pet Sept 13. Ord Sept 13 EASTON, EDWARD, jun, Manchester, Joiner. Manchester. Pet Aug 12. Ord Sept 14 EMERY, WALTER, Barningham Norwood, Norfolk, Farmer. Norwich. Pet Sept 12. Ord Sept 12 FORBES, STEWART, address unknown. High Court. Pet June 7. Ord Sept 14 GREENWAY, KELYNGE, THOMAS GREENWAY, GEORGE CATTELL GREENWAY, and Exeter ALLEN, ROBERT, Latimer rd, Notting hill, Pianoforte Manufacturer. Sept 27 at 11. 33, Carey st, Lincoln's inn BARGER, THOMAS JOHN, Rhyl, Hotel Keeper. Sept 27 at 2. Off Rec, Crypt chmbrs, Chester BEARD, GEORGE WILLIAM, Westbourne, out of business. Sept 27 at 2.30. Off Rec, Salisbury BIRD, HENRY, Coventry, Watch Manufacturer. Sept 26 at 12.20. Off Rec, 17, Hertford st, Coventry BIRD. JOHN, Lorton, nr Cockermouth, Farmer. Sept 23 at 2. 67, Duke st, Whitehaven BLACK, GEORGE Gow, Lime st, Shipowner. Sept 28 at 12. 83, Carey st, Lincoln's inn BOND, JOHN, Cambridge rd, Bethnal Green, Licensed Victualler. Sept 28 at 11. BROWN, CHARLES, South Shields, Auctioneer. Sept 27 at 2.30. Off Rec, Pink lane, Newcastle on Tyne BROWNE, W P BARTON, Chancery lane, Solicitor. Sept 27 at 12. 33, Carey st, CHAMBERS, WILLIAM, York Bootmaker. Sept 24 at 2. Off Rec, York COCKERILL. ELEANOR, Lawford, Warwick, Plumber. Sept 26 at 1. Off Rec, 17, Hertford st. Coventry COOTES, JAMES, West Ham, Essex, Contractor. Sept 23 at 11. 33, Carey st, 1.incoln's inn CRANFIELD, SAMUEL, Rolvenden, Kent, Veterinary Surgeon. Pavilion bldgs, Brighton DOUGLAS, CHARLES, Salford, Lancs, Draper. Sept 23 at 11.30. chbrs, Bridge st, Manchester Sept 23 at 3 4, Off Rec, Ogden's EDEN, WALTER RIVERS, St John's pk, Blackheath, Civil Service Writer. Sept 27 at 11. 33, Carey st, Lincoln's inn ELWELL, THOMAS, Wolverhampton, Merchant. Sept 27 at 3. Off Rec, St Peta's close. Wolverhampton FORTH, JOHN, Shrewsbury, Hatter. Sept 27 at 10.30. Law Society, Talbot chbrs, Shrewsbury FURTWANGLER, ANDREAS, Strand, Watchmaker. Sept 23 at 12. 33, Carey st, Lincoln's inn GRAHAM, BENJAMIN, Wakefield, Jeweller. Sept 23 at 11. Off Rec, Bond terrace, Wakefield HARRISON, ELIJAH, Bradford, Painter. Sept 23 at 11. Off Rec, 31, Manor row, Bradford JONES, JOHN, Pentre, Glamorgan, Bootmaker. Sept 23 at 3. Off Rec, Merthyr Tydfil KELF, JAMES. Hardy ter, Wood green, Auctioneer. Sept 27 at 11. 16 Room, 30 and 31, St Swithin's lane KURTZIG, LOUIS, address unknown. Sept 23 at 1. 83, Carey st, Lincoln's inn LAMBERT, MATTHEW, Newbiggin in Bishopdale, nr Aysgarth, Yorks, Farmer. Sept 26 at 11.30. Court House, Northallerton LORD, RICHARD, Coventry, Builder. Sept 26 at 1.30. Off Rec, 17, Hertford st, MILES, SIMON LEWIS. Pentre, Glamorganshire, Grocer. Sept 26 at 3. Off Rec, OWEN, GEORGE, Madeley, Salop, Beerhouse Keeper. Sept 24 at 11.45. County PARSONS, HENRY, Milborne St Andrew, Dorset, Baker. Sept 26 at 12. Temperance Hall. Poo'e PITT, CHARLES, Bournemouth, Ironmonger. Sept 26 at 2. Royal Talbot Hotel, Victoria st, Bristol PRICE, RICHARD, Ystrad, Glamorganshire, Harpist. Sept 23 at 12. Off Rec, Merthyr Tydfil REES, DAVID, Newport, Mon., Iron Founder. Sept 24 at 12. Off Rec, 12, Trede gar pl. Newport, Mon ROBERTS, ROWLAND, Holywell, Flintshire, Ironmonger. Sept 27 at 2.30. Off Rec, Crypt chbrs, Chester SCORE, JAMES HENRY, Southampton, Shipwright. Sept 27 at 11. Off Rec, 4, East st, Southampton SMITH, ARTHUR WILLIAM, Sutton, Clerk. Sept 23 at 3. 109, Victoria st, Westminster SMITH, JOHN RICHARD, Ledbury, Herefordshire, Wine Merchant. Sept 6 at 11. VENVILLE, JOHN, Eastington, Gloucestershire, Farmer. Sept 23 at 2. Wheatsheaf Hotel, Northleach, Gloucestershire VICKERS, HERBERT. and WILLIAM EDWARD VICKERS, Nottingham, Timber Mer- WOOD, RICHARD, COOPER, Kingston upon Hull, Hairdresser. Sept 23 at 11. Off WRIGHTON, JOHN, Brackley, Northamptonshire, Boot Maker. Sept 23 at 11.33. The following amended notice is substituted for that published in the London Gazette of September 13. KING, THOMAS CHARLES. Lamberhurst. Sussex. Grocer. Sept 26 at 2.30. Spencer & Reeves, Mount Pleasant, Tunbridge Wells. ADJUDICATIONS. ALLEN, HENRY, Exeter, General Merchant. Exeter. Pet Sept 12. Ord Sept 12 BETTELLEY, JOSEPH, Hanley, Earthenware Manufacturer. Hanley, Burslem, and Tunstall. Pet Sept 7. Ord Sept 9 BIRD, HENRY, Coventry, Watch Manufacturer. Coventry. Pet Aug 22. Ord Sept 13 BURNET. FREDERICK, Liverpool, Music Dealer. Liverpool. Pet Aug 22. Ord Sept 13 CARTMEL, WILLIAM CHARLES, West Derby, nr Liverpool, Timber Merchant. COMPERE, THOMAS, Abergavenny, Mon, Merchant. Tredegar. Pet Aug 11. Cox, JOHN WALTER, Deptford, Kent, Builder. Greenwich. Pet Sept 13. Ord Ord ELSNER, ISAAC, Birmingham, Pawnbroker. Birmingham. Pet Aug 12. Ord GALLARD, GEORGE, Aldrington, nr Brighton, Gent. Brighton. Pet July 26. Ord HARRIS. HARRIETTE, Blom field terr, Lodging house keeper. High Court. Pet Pet MILNER, PETER BERRIMAN, Scarborough, Butcher. Scarborough. Pet Sept 6. Ord Sept 12 MUSGRAVE, CHARLES, Wildsworth, Lincolnshire, Farmer. Lincoln. Pet Sept 13. Ord Sept 13 OUTHWAITE, MATTHEW, Bilton, Yorks, Farmer. York. Pet Sept 10. Ord Sept 10 PARSONS, HENRY, Milborne St Andrew, Dorset, Baker. Dorchester. Pet Sept 12. Ord Sept 12 PEARCE THOMAS ALBERT, St Albans, Licensed Victualler. St Albans. Pet Aug 2. Ord Sept 9 PIERCEY, ROBERT, Gt Western rd, Paddington, Engineer. High Court. Pet July 28 Ord Sept 13 ROSE, GEORGE, Horncastle, Higgler. Lincoln. Pet Sept 13. Ord Sept 13 RUSSELL, THOMAS, Scarborough, Carriage Proprietor. Scarborough. Pet Sept 5. Or1 Sept 12 SHEPHERD, THOMAS, Bootle, nr Liverpool, Ship Broker. Liverpool. Pet Sept 5. Ord Sept 12 WARSOP, WILLIAM EDWARD, Bristol, Cabinet Maker. Bristol. Pet Sept 9. Ord WILLIAMS, DAVID, Aberdare, Tin Plate Maker. Aberdare. Pet Aug 29. Ord The following amended rotice is substituted for that published in the London Gazette.-TUESDAY, Sept. 20. RECEIVING ORDERS. Pet ALLERTON, CHARLES HEDLEY, Lowestoft, Blockmaker. Gt Yarmouth. BARRETT, JOHN, Cookham, Berks, no occupation. Windsor. Pet Sept 15. Ord BARTON, GEORGE, I W, Yeoman. Newport and Ryde. Pet Sept 13. Ord Sept 13 GLAZE, JOHN, Halesowen, Worcester, Boot Manufacturer. Stourbridge. Pet GRAHAM, ELIZABETH, Sheffield, Fruiterer. Sheffield. Pet Sept 17. Ord Sept 17 GREEN, JOSEPH, Awsworth, Nottingham, Collier. Derby. Pet Sept 15. Ord Sept 15 HANN, HERBERT, and WILLIAM HENRY HANN, Bournemouth, Builders. Poole. Pet Aug 31. Ord Sept 17 HENDY, FREDERICK CHARLES, Cowley rd, Uxbridge, Builder. Windsor. Pet HERD, GEORGE CHARLES, Tabard st, Southwark, Manager to a Provision Dealer. HOLLIDAY, JARED, Westlinton, Cumberland, Shoemaker. Carlisle. Pet Sept 17. HUGHES, JAMES, Lower Broadheath, Worcestershire, Farmer. Worcester. Pet JONES, JOHN, Bristol, Baker. Bristol. Pet Sept 17. Ord Sept 17 JONES, THOMAS WEBB, Malvern Wells, Worcestershire, out of business. Worcester. Pet Sept 16. Ord Sept 16 JUDGE, THOMAS COVENTRY, Chard, Clock Maker. Taunton. Pet Sept 16. Ord Sept 16 NELSON, EDWARD ALBERT, Bennett's hill, Solicitor. High Court. Pet July 19. Ord Sept 16 NEWTON, JOHN, Southsea, Grocer. Portsmouth. Pet Sept 12. Ord Sept 12 PALEY, JOHN, Countersett, nr Hawes, Yorks, Innkeeper. Northallerton. Pet REAY. HANNAH, and ROBERT REAY, Kirklinton, Cumberland, Farmers. Carlisle. REVETT, ROBERT PATTLE, Parham, Suffolk, Farmer. Ipswich. Pet Sept 16. Ord Sept 16 RHODES, MARY LOUISA, Heckmondwike, nr Dewsbury, Manufacturer. Dewsbury. Pet Sept 15. Ord Sept. 15 ROBSON, JAMES, Brackenborough, Lincolnshire, Esq. Gt Grimsby. Pet Sept 15. SIMMONS, DANIEL, New Village, nr Bilston, Baker. Wolverhampton. Pet Sept THOMAS, WILLIAM, Cardigan, Cabinet Maker. Carmarthen. Pet Sept 15. Ord ULLYETT, EDWIN, Folkestone, Carpenter. Canterbury. Pet Sept 15. Ord Sept 15 VASSALLI, JOHN, New Brighton, Cheshire, Tallow Chandler. Birkenhead. Pet WALLACE, JAMES JEFFRIES, Philpot lane, Financial Agent. WIGFALL, WILLIAM. jun., Sheffield, Brush Manufacturer. Sheffield. Pet Sept 15. Ord ept 15 WILSON, CHARLES, Knottingley, Yorks, Draper. Wakefield. Pet Sept 17. Ord Sept 17 WOOD, G. T., Miles lane. High Court. Pet Aug 2. Ord Sept 15 WOODHAMS, JOHN NEWMAN, Erdington, Traveller. Birmingham. Pet Sept 15. The following amended notice is substituted for that published in the LOWE, WALTER, Irlam, nr Warrington, Chemist. Manchester. Pet Sept 7. FIRST MEETINGS. ARMENER. JOHN, Eastbourne, Fruiterer. Sept 27 at 12. 4, Pavilion bldgs, Brighton BARTON, GEORGE, I.W., Yeoman. Oct 3 at 12. Warburton's Hotel, Newport BISHOP, GEORGE, and HORATIO WHITE, Boscombe, nr Bournemouth, Builders. Sept 27 at 12.30. Off Rec, Salisbury BLOOD, JOHN, Heather Mill, Leicester, Miller. Sept 30 at 12. 28, Friar la e, BURNET, EDWARD, and FREDerick Burnet, Liverpool, Music Sellers. Sept 30 at CHAMBERS, THOMAS, Scarborough, Grocer. Sept 27 at 12.30. Station Hotel, York COMPERE, THOMAS, Abergavenny, Mon, Merchant. Sept 29 at 3. Off Rec, Merthyr Tydfil EMERY, WALTER, Norwood, Norfolk, Farmer. Oct 1 at 12. Off Rec, 8, King st, GLOVER, TOM, Warwick, Saddler. Sept 27 at 12. J Boddington, solor, High s ́, GREEN, JOSEPH. Awsworth, Nottingham, Collier. Sept 29 at 2.30. Off Rec, St. James's chbrs, Derby HILLIER, WILLIAM HENRY, Marlborough, Upholsterer. Sept 28 at 2. Off Rec, 32. High st, Swindon HOLE, JOHN, Shepton Mallet, Coach Builder. Sept 28 at 1. Off Rec, Bank chbrs, Bristol HOLLIDAY, JARED, Westlinton, Cumberland, Shoemaker. Sept 29 at 12 30. Off Rec, 34. Fisher st, Carlisle HOLYLAND, JOHN TOM, Leicester, Hosiery Dealer. Sept 27 at 12. 28, Friar lane. Leicester HUGHES, JAMES, Lower Broadheath, Worcestershire, Farmer. Sept 30 at 10.30. HUGHES JOHN, Birmingham, Grocer. Sept 28 at 11. 25, Celmore row, Birming- JONES. THOMAS WEBB, Malvern Wells, out of business. Sept 30 at 11. Off Rec, KEMP, SAMUEL, Winterwell, nr Wath upon Dearne, Yorks, Shoemaker. Sept 28 LACY, JAMES ALOYSIUS, and CARTMEL, WILLIAM CHARLES. Liverpool, Timber LOWE, WALTER, Irlam, nr Warrington, Chemist. Sept 29 at 11.30. Off Rec, MATCHAM, THOMAS, High rd, Balham, Grocer. Sept 27 at 3. 109, Victoria st, MEADWELL, WILLIAM, Peterborough, Painter. Oct 4 at 12. Law Courts. Peterborough |