Ellis v. Wright and Others (76 L.T.

522), 92, vi.
Evans, in re; e. p. Davis (76 L.T.

530), 92, ii.

Consort Deep Level Gold Mines,
Ltd., in re ;

e. p. Stark (L.R.
[1897] 1 Ch. 575; 76 L.T. 300),
95, iv.
Continental Oxygen Co., Ltd., in re;

Elias v. Continental Oxygen Co.,

Ltd. (76 L.T. 229), 95, ii.
Coolgardie Consolidated Gold Mines,

Ltd. ; in re (76 L.T. 269), 94, i.
County Council of Worcestershire v.

Assessment Committee of Wor-
cestershire (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B.

480; 76 L.T. 138), 106, v.
Crathie, the (L.R. [1897] P. 178; 76

L.T. 534), 109, vi.
Crayford, Overseers of, and District

Council of, v. D. & C. Rutter (L.R.
[1897] 1 Q.B. 650 ; 76 L.T. 392),
106, vi.

FARRELL V. FARRELL (76 L.T. 167),

98, vi.
Fenner and Lord, in re an Arbitration

between (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 667;

76 L.T. 376), 104, vii.
Finlay v. Darling (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch.

719 ; 76 L.T. 461), 108, v.
Finlay v. Mexican Investment Cor-

poration (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 517;

76 L.T. 257), 99, ii.
Firth v. Staines (L.R. (1897] 2 Q.B.

70; 76 L.T. 496), 101, v.
Floyd v. J. Lyons & Co., Ltd. (L.R.

[1897] 1 Ch. 633 ; 76 L.T. 251),
99, iv.
Forrest v. Todd (76 L.T. 500),

105, viii.

DE HAYN V. GARLAND; in re DE

LINDEN; in re SPURRIER'S SETTLE-
MENT (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 453; 76

L.T. 180), 100, vi.
De Linden, in re ; in re Spurrier ; De

Hayn v. Garland (L.R. (1897] 1

Ch. 453; 76 L.T. 180), 100, vi.
Derbyshire v. Montagu; in re Montagu

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 685 and 2 Ch.

8; 76 L.T. 289 and 485), 108, iv.
Devonshire (Duke of) v. Stokes (76

L.T. 424), 102, i.
Dodd v. Churton (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B.

562; 76 L.T. 438), 96, i.
Donnisthorpe's Claim and the Man-

chester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire
Railway (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 671;

76 L.T. 371), 104, vi.
Duff v. Hawker; in re Hawker's

Settled Estates (76 L.T. 286),

108, iii.
Duncan v. Dowding and Others

(L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 575; 76 L.T.

294), 99, vii.
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co., Ltd.

v. New Seddon Pneumatic Tyre
and Self-Closing Tube Co., Ltd.

(76 L.T. 405), 102, vii.
Dunn v. Macdonald (L.R. [1897] 1

Q.B. 555 ; 76 L.T. 444), 105, ix.
Durrant v. the Branksome Urban

District Council (76 L.T. 486),
106, i.

GALLARD, in re; e. p. GALLARD (L.R.

[1897] 2 Q.B. 8; 76 L.T. 327),

91, iii.
Game v. Young; in re Game (L.R.

[1897] 1 Ch. 881 ; 76 L.T. 450),

112, vi.
Goldstein v. Vaughan (L.R. (1897)

1 Q.B. 549; 76 L.T. 262), 97, iii.
Goodlock v. Cousins (L.R. [1897]

1 Q.B. 558; 76 L.T. 313), 96, v.
Graham v. Sutton & Co. (L.R.

[1897] 1 Ch. 716; 76 L.T. 369),

105, iii.
Grosvenor and West End Railway

Terminus Hotel Co., Ltd., in re

(76 L.T. 337), 95, vi.
HAMINI AND OTHERS V. TILLEKERATNE

(L.R. [1897] A.C. 277; 76 L.T.
210), 93, vi.
Harris

v. Sleep (76 L.T. 458),
105, vi.
Hawke v. Dunn (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B.

579; 76 L.T. 355), 97, vii.
Hawker's Settled Estates, in re;

Duff v. Hawker (76 L.T. 286),

108, iii.
Hawley, in re;

e. p. Ridgway (76
L.T. 501), 91, vi.
Hayward v. Hayward ; in re Hayward

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 905; 76 L.T.

383), 91, v.
Hill (Viscount) v. Bullock (L.R.

[1897] 2 Ch. 55 ; 76 L.T. 417),

97, iv.
Hodgkins v. Sinclair (76 L.T. 452),

90, ii.
Hood v. Attorney-General; in re

Hunter (L.R. (1897] 1 'Ch. 518;
76 L.T. 386), 112, iii.

EARL COWLEY, in re ESTATE DUTY

PAYABLE ON THE DEATH OF THE

SECOND (76 L.T. 567), 107, ii.
Edison General Electric Co. v. West-

minster and Vancouver Tramway
Co. (L.R. [1897]A.C. 193), 22,58, ii.
Elias v. Continental Oxygen Co.

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 511; 76 L.T.
229), 95, ii.

Hood - Barrs Crossman and

Prichard (L.R .[1897] A.C. 172;

76 L.T. 297), 104, iv.
Hood-Barrs v. Heriot (second appeal)

(L.R. (1897] A.C. '177; 76 L.T.

299), 104, v.
Hopcraft v. Hopcraft (76 L.T. 341),

111, i.
Hornsey District Council v. Smith

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 843; 76 L.T.

431), 102, v.
Huddersfield Corporation v. Ravens-

thorpe Urban District Council
(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 652; 76 L.T.

377), 100, iii.
Humphreys v. Gadsden; in re Cosier

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 325; 76 L.T.
31), 112, vii.

Magnolia Metal Co.'s Trade Marks,

in re (76 L.T. 190), 110, iv.
Manders v. Manders (L.R. (1897]

1 Q.B. 474), 98, iv.
Marlborough” (Duke of) v. Queen

Anne's Bounty (Governors of), in
re (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 712; 76 L.T.

388), 108, vi.
Master in Equity of Supreme Court

of Victoria v. Pearson (L.R. [1897]

A.C. 214), 22, 58, iii.
Mayflower, the Log of the (76 L.T.

295), 106, vii.
McCall and Co., Ltd., v. Houlder and

Co. (76 L.T. 469), 109, vii.
McInany v. Hildrith (L.R. [1897]

1 Q.B. 600; 76 L.T. 463), 97, vi.
Meates v. Bishop; in re North (76

L.T. 186), 112, i.
Minna Craig Steamship Co.

Chartered Mercantile Bank of
India, London, and China (L.R.
[1897] 1 Q.B. 460; 76 L.T. 310),

22, 44, ii. ; 97, v.
Montague, in re; e. p. Ward v.

London and South Western Bank

(76 L.T. 203), 91, ii.
Morter, in re; e. p. Nicholls (76 L.T.

532), 92, iv.
Mountfield v. Ward (76 L.T. 202),

22, 67, i.

JENKINS, in the goods of ; JENKINS v.

JENKINS (76 L.T. 164), 103, vii.
Jenks v. Clifden (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch.

694; 76 L.T. 382), 89, i.
John O'Scot, the (L.R. (1897] P. 64;

76 L.T. 222), 109, i.
Joseph v. Joseph and Burnhill

(76 L.T. 236), 104, ii.
Judkins v. Judkins (76 L.T. 169 and
409), 22, 62, ii.

KENNEDY V. DE TRAFFORD (L.R. (1897]

A.C. 180; 76 L.T. 427), 102, iv.
Koosen v. Rose (76 L.T. 145), 103, iv.

NEw Moss COLLIERY Co. v. MAN-

CHESTER, SHEFFIELD AND LINCOLN-
SHIRE RAILWAY (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch.

725 ; 76 L.T. 231), 93, i.
New, Prance, and Garrard, Trustee

of, v. Hunting and Others (L.R.
[1897] 1 Q.B. 607; 76 L.T. 196),

90, v.
Nicholson v. Rhodesia Trading Co.,

Ltd. (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 434 ; 76

L.T 147), 94, vi.
North, in re; Meates v. Bishop (76

L.T. 186), 112, i.

LAMOND V. RICHARD (L.R. [1897]1 Q.B.

541; 76 L.T. 141), 22, 65, ii. ; 99, i.
Larocque v. Beauchemin and Others

(L.R. [1897] A.C. 358; 76 L.T.

473), 93, iv.
Lazarus v. Artistic Photographic

Co., Ltd. (76 L.T. 457), 97, ii.
Lewis v. Powell (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch.

678; 76 L.T. 282), 104, iii.
Lilley, Frederick G., in the goods of

(76 L.T. 164), 103, v.
Liverpool General Brokers' Associa-

tion, Ltd., v. Commercial Press
Telegram Bureaux (L.R. [1897]

2 Q.B. 1; 76 L.T. 292), 96, iv.
Lord Advocate v. Robertson (76 L.T.

125), 108, i.
London and County Banking Co. v.

Goddard (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 642;

76 L.T. 277), 102, iii.
M. v. M. (otherwise A.) (76 L.T. 172),

98, viii.
Macmillan v. Australasian Terri-

tories, Ltd., and Others (76 L.T.

182), 103, viii.
Madeley v. Ross, Sleeman & Co.

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 505; 76 L.T.
321), 94, ii.

.

District Council (76 L.T. 318),

104, viii.
Sprigg v. Sigcau (L.R. [1897] A.C.

238; 76 L.T. 127), 93, v.
Stileman-Gibbard v. Wilkinson and

Others (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 749 ;

76 L.T. 90), 22, 63, i.
St. Olave's Union v. Canterbury

Union (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 682 ;

76 L.T. 88 and 517), 103, ii.
Swabey, in re ; e. p. Swabey (76 L.T.

534), 92, v.

Priestley v. Ellis (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch.

489; 76 L.T. 187), 108, vii.
Pritchett v. Poole (76 L.T.472), 96, vi.
Raatz, in re; e. p. CARLHIAN (76 L.T.

330), 105, i.
Raatz, in re ; e. p. Raatz (L.R. [1897]

2 Q.B. 80; 76 L.T. 503), 91, viii.
Ratata, the (L.R. [1897] P. 118;

76 L.T. 224), 109, ii.
Reg. v. Charity Commissioners for
England and Wales (76 L.T. 199),

22, 68, ii.
Reg. v. Clerk of Assize of Oxford

Circuit (76 L.T. 260), 22, 62, i.
Reg. v. Commissioners of Lunacy

(L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 630 ; 76 L.T.

353), 100, v.
Reg. v. Lewisham Union (L.R. (1897]

1 Q.B. 498 ; 76 L.T. 324), 104, ix.
Reg. v. London County Council

(76 L.T. 472), 101, i.
Reg. v. London (Justices of) (L.R.

[1897] 1 Q.B. 433), 106, iv.
Reg. v. Pelly and Another (L.R.

[1897] 2 Q.B. 33; 76 L.T. 467),

100, i.
Reg. v. Turner (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B.

445 ; 76 L.T. 556), 96, vii.
Ridgway, e.p.; in re Hawley (76 L.T.

501), 91, vi.
Roberts, in re; Knight v. Roberts

(76 L.T. 479), 89, ii.
Rumney and Smith's Contract

(76 L.T. 343), 111, ii.

TADCASTER TOWER BREWERY Co. v.

WILSON (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 705 ;

76 L.T. 459), 110, iii.
Tate v. Latham & Sons (76 L.T. 336),

101, iii.
Thomas V. Foster ; in re Foster

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 484 ; 76 L.T.

228), 107, i.
Thompson v. Redding; in re Redding

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 876; 76 L.T.

339), 112, ii.
Toleman, in re; Westwood v. Booker

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 866; 76 L.T.

381), 105, iv.
Trevor v. Hutchins (76 L.T. 183),

100, ii.

SALISBURY GOLD MINING Co.

HATHORN AND OTHERS (L.R. [1897]

A.C. 268; 76 L.T. 212), 93, vii.
Saunders v. Gore; in re Saunders

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 888; 76 L.T.

345), 107, vii.
Saunders v. Saunders (L.R. (1897]

P. 89; 76 L.T. 330), 98, ii.
Scowby v. Scowby ; in re Scowby

L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 741; 76 L.T. 363),

105, ii.
Seaward v. Paterson (L.R. [1897]

1 Ch. 545 ; 76 L.T. 215), 95, vii.
Simpson v. Hughes and Armstrong

(76 L.T. 237), 22, 61, iii, ; 110, vi.
Slater, in re ; e. p. Slater (76 L.T.

529), 92, i.
Small and Others v. United Kingdom
Mutual Insurance Co. (L.R. (1897]

2 Q.B. 42; 76 L.T. 326), 109, iv.
Smith v. Batsford (76 L.T. 179),

110, v.
South African Territories v. Wal-

lington (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 692 ;

76 L.T. 520), 96, iii.
Southport (Mayor, Aldermen and

Burgesses of) v. Birkdale Urban

WALKER v. WALKER AND LAWSON

(76 L.T. 235), 104, i.
Ward y. London and South Western

Bank; in re Montague (76 L.T.

203), 91, ii.
Welton v. Saffery (L.R. (1897) A.C.

299; 76 L.T. 505), 94, iv.
Western Counties Steam Bakeries
and Milling Co., Ltd., in re; e. p.
Parsons and Robjent (L.R. [1897]
1 Ch. 617; 76 L.T. 239), 22, 60,

vi. ; 95, iii.
White v. Southend Hotel Co., Ltd.

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 767; 76 L.T.

273), 99, v.
Wiesener v. Rackow (76 L.T. 448),

90, iii.
Wilding v. Sanderson (76 L.T. 346),

102, ii.
Wilkinson and Wife v. Downson

(L.R. [1897] 2 Q.B. 57; 76 L.T.

493), 100, vii.
Williams v. Goose (L.R. [1897]1 Q.B.

471 ; 76 L.T. 143), 103, iii.
Williams v. Grant (76 L.T. 150),

101, ii.
Wilmot v. Betterton ; in re Wilmot

(76 L.T. 415), 112, iv.
Woodroof, in re;

e. p. Woodroof
(76 L.T. 502), 91, vii.
Wragg, E. J., Ltd., in re (L.R. [1897]

1 Ch. 796 ; 76 L.T. 397), 94, iii.