« PreviousContinue »
There have, however, been passed since this statute the Public Health Act, I875, and the Local Government Boards Provisional Orders Confirmation (No. 2) Act, 1895, and the point was whether an urban district council could require a party to sell part only of his land or garden and not the whole, for, as the council contended, the statutes of 1875 and I895 permitted them to do so. The council argued that sect. I76 of the Public Health Act, I875, did not compel the local authority to put in force any of the compulsory powers of the Lands Clauses Acts other than the procedure powers contained in sects. 16 to 68 of the Act of 1845. Sect. 92 was only, through sub-sect. 5 of sect. 176 of the Public Health Act, I875, capable of being incorporated in the Confirmation Act by means of some express enactment to that effect to be found therein. Mr. ]ustice (now Lord ]ustice) Chitty did not adopt the council’s views in this case of Brenckley v. Twickenham Urban District Council. His Lordship preferred to decide in favour of the plaintiff, and held that the provisional order, confirmed by the subsequent Act of I895, contained on its face no modification of the compulsory powers of the Act of 1845, and that the restriction of sect. 92 remained unaffected. The Act of I895 removed certain fetters, but did not contain any incorporation of the powers of the Act of 1845. But even if there were any incorporation, the defendants were not right in saying that such powers stopped at sect. 68 and did not go so far as sect. 92, or began at sect. 16 and did not include prior sections. In the latter case, according to the defendants’ view, local authorities would be in difficulties, for in the case of vendors under disability the local authorities would not be obtaining, by means of their Acts, the benefit of sect. 9 of the Act of 1845 and the procedure thereunder. Whether the Local Government Board could have modified a provisional order in the way contended was not considered. Possibly it could do so,
but then it would be for Parliament to consider, when
V. asked to confirm the order, whether to do so would be just
to the owner of the land sought to be taken. It might be added that the present procedure had been in force for a great number of years, though the present point was now heard for the first time. The injunction accordingly issued, but, of course, defendants were not restrained from taking the whole of the premises.
If by the terms of a settlement trustees are not to be under any legal liability as to the safe custody of heirlooms, this will not prevent them from interfering by virtue of the legal right which they have in the chattels. They can, therefore, interfere if a tenant for life includes heirlooms in a bill of sale as security for his own debt, and runs the risk
_of having them seized by a money-lender, more especially
if this is done without the consent or knowledge of the
“trustees. In the case of Von der Heit v. Sir Robert Peel
such incidents as these had occurred, and one of the trustees
'of the settlement moved the Chancery Division for the appointment of a proper person to have the care and custody
of the heirlooms subject to the trusts of the settlement. The plaintiff and his co-trustee held the Peel family estates, family heirlooms during Sir Robert Peel’s life or until
alienation, and the trustees besides letting defendant have
the personal use of the mansion house, could retain there the family heirlooms or remove them where they thought fit, and allow defendant their personal use and enjoyment. The defendant borrowed money upon security of a bill of sale, and some of the family heirlooms comprising furniture, pictures, cases and boxes of plate, were included in the security, and defendant delivered some of the cases and boxes to a money-lender, who kept them for a time and then sent them to a safe deposit company. \Vhen plaintiff asked for an explanation of the removal of the heirlooms, defendant urged that it had occurred through accident or misapprehension, but as to the plate for motives of safety and economy. Mr. Justice Chitty, however, considered that the defendant’s conduct had placed the plate in jeopardy, and that the plaintiff was justified in intervening and asking for the protection of the Court. The plate had, therefore, to be delivered up to the trustees, and a caretaker was appointed for the heirlooms at the
Paterson’s Practical Statutes of the Session 1896. Horace Cox, London. Price ros.
The Maritime Codes of Spain and Portugal. By F. W. Raikes, LL.D., Q.C. Eflingham Wilson, London, 1896. Price 7s. 6d.
The Preservation of Open Spaces and of Footpaths and other Rights of Way. By Sir Robert Hunter, M.A. Eyre and Spottiswoode, London, 1896. Price 7s. 6d.
Confederation Law of Canada. By Gerald john Wheeler, M.A., LL.B. Eyre and Spottiswoode, London, 1896. Price £2 zs.
Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. Vol. l. By Roger Foster. Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner and Co., Ltd., London, I896.
Etudes de Droit International. By E. Nys. Castaigne, Brussels; Fontemoing, Paris; 1896.
Principe: du Droit des Gens. By Alphonse Rivier. 2 Vols. A. Rousseau, Paris, 1896.
Mortuary Law. By Sidney Perley. George B. Reed, Boston, 1896.
Le Témoignage tie la Femme ,- L’Epargne rte la Femme Mnriée; Les Salaires de la Famille Ouvriére. By Louis Frank. H. Lamertin, Brussels, 1896.
La Femme contre L’A lcool. By Louis Frank. H. Lamertin, Brussels, 1897.
A Biographical Sketch of Lord Bowen. By Sir Henry Stewart Cunningham. John Murray, London, 1897.
Edwards’ Compendium of the Law of Property in Land. Third Edition. By Wm. Douglas Edwards. Stevens and Haynes, London, 1896. Price £1.
International Law. A simple statement of its principles. By Herbert Wolcott Bowen. Putnam’s Sons, New York and London, 1896. Price 5s.
Hunt’s Law of Boundaries and Fences. Fourth Edition. By Archibald Brown. Butterworth and Co., London, 1896. Price 14s.
The Yearly County Court Practice. Two Vols. By G. Pitt-Lewis, Q.C., and C. Arnold White. Butterworth and Co., Shaw and Sons, London, 1897. Price 25s.
Admiralty yurisdiction and Practice in County Courts. By F. W. Raikes, LL.D., Q.C., and B. D. Kilburn, M.A. William Clowes and Sons, Ltd., London, 1896.
Executive Powers in Relation to Crime and Disorder. By Thos. W Haycraft, B.A. Butterworth and Co., London, 1897. Price 6s.
Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, Historical and fnridioal. By Rocen Fosrun, of the New York Bar, and Lecturer on Federal jurisprudence at the Law School of Yale University. Vol. I. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., Limited. 1896.
To those who would study the Constitution of the United States, we heartily commend this book. The author commences with an introduction, which is brimful of authority and learning, dealing with Paper Constitutions, the anarchy preceding the Federal Convention, preliminaries of the same, prototypes of the same, its models and compromises, with its result. An interesting précis of the persecution of ]ohn Lilburn, a Puritan, in the Star Chamber, on the charge of importing factious and scandalous books, amongst others, “ Litany for the especiall use of our English Prelates” and “ The vanity and impiety of the old Litany” follows. Other matters treated in this volume are the three departments of the Government of the United States, Congress in general, the right of suffrage, the Speaker and other officers, the Senate, impeachment, and a well-selected collection of State Trials on the latter subject. So good is the book that we look forward with pleasure to the publication of its next volume.
Circuit, Barrister-at-Law, London: Stevens and Sons, Ltd. 1896.
The author has endeavoured to collect and arrange in one volume the cardinal rules of interpretation of all legal documents. The attempt had previously been made with regard to the interpretation of statutes, but so far as we are aware, this is the first attempt to enunciate a canon of interpretation for all legal documents. Mr. Beal observes with truth, that the rules of interpretation are scattered in various reports and statutes, and we cannot but praise the labour and erudition which he has bestowed in preparing the succinct work before us. He gives as his authorities the reported words of the Court or Judge in which a particular rule is laid down. The book is divided into eight parts, dealing successively with Case Law, Rules of Legal Interpretation applicable to all Instruments, Contracts, Deeds, Mercantile Documents, Miscellaneous Instruments, Statutes, and Wills, besides an Appendix containing the Interpretation Act, 1889, 52 & 53 Vict., c. 63, and the now repealed Lord Brougham's Act, 1850. It is interesting to note that the Times Reports are admitted by Courts, because they are reported by Barristers who put their names to their Reports; but the Weekly Notes are not to be cited as an authority, Of the old reports, Plowden (1550-80) is the most accurate of all reporters, while of “Modern Cases in Law and Equity" (1669-1732) the Courts, we are informed, “treated that book with the contempt it deserves.” We cannot too highly praise the industry of Mr. Beal, and we are assured by a close examination of his book that it is bound to become a leading text-book on the subject which it treats of.
The Preservation of Open Spaces and of Footpaths and of other Rights of Way. By Sir PoBERT HUNTER, M.A., Solicitor to the Post Office, formerly Honorary Solicitor to the Commons Preservation Society. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode. 1896.
The author has endeavoured to treat of the several descriptions of land, which are subject to Common rights, and how such lands may be protected from enclosure. The peculiarities attaching to Common fields and pastures, and to the Common land of forests, are widely different; it has not always been borne in mind how large a part of England was formerly under