Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Ohio Circuit Courts...: Ohio Circuit Decisions, Volume 29Laning printing Company, 1920 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... held on to things , peeled vegetables , wiped dishes . As long as I can remember her hands were awfully wrinkled , veins prominent . ' Hamilton County Appeals . Grandma always told us she had 39 ] 3 OHIO CIRCUIT AND APPEALS COURTS .
... held on to things , peeled vegetables , wiped dishes . As long as I can remember her hands were awfully wrinkled , veins prominent . ' Hamilton County Appeals . Grandma always told us she had 39 ] 3 OHIO CIRCUIT AND APPEALS COURTS .
Page 22
... held that the latter section should be given full effect in de- termining the final jurisdiction of the mayor in the prosecution of misdemeanors when the accused was not entitled to the con- stitutional right of trial by jury . The ...
... held that the latter section should be given full effect in de- termining the final jurisdiction of the mayor in the prosecution of misdemeanors when the accused was not entitled to the con- stitutional right of trial by jury . The ...
Page 23
... held that the jurisdiction of a mayor and the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace are con- trolled by different sections of the statutes , a decision based up- on the statutes governing procedure before a justice of the peace is of ...
... held that the jurisdiction of a mayor and the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace are con- trolled by different sections of the statutes , a decision based up- on the statutes governing procedure before a justice of the peace is of ...
Page 38
... held that Sec . 11577 G. C. has no reference to courts of appeals ; that the right of re- versal is jurisdictional and not procedural ; that the court of appeals now obtains its jurisdiction from the constitution , where formerly it was ...
... held that Sec . 11577 G. C. has no reference to courts of appeals ; that the right of re- versal is jurisdictional and not procedural ; that the court of appeals now obtains its jurisdiction from the constitution , where formerly it was ...
Page 43
... held under authority of law . [ Syllabus by the court . ] ERROR . Edward C. Turner , Atty . - Gen . , A. O. Dickey and E. E. Lindsay , Pros . Atty . , for plaintiff in error . error . J. C. Mitchell and Graham & Stafford , for defendant ...
... held under authority of law . [ Syllabus by the court . ] ERROR . Edward C. Turner , Atty . - Gen . , A. O. Dickey and E. E. Lindsay , Pros . Atty . , for plaintiff in error . error . J. C. Mitchell and Graham & Stafford , for defendant ...
Contents
2 | |
23 | |
26 | |
53 | |
59 | |
60 | |
107 | |
130 | |
286 | |
317 | |
326 | |
352 | |
366 | |
372 | |
374 | |
378 | |
162 | |
171 | |
187 | |
216 | |
229 | |
231 | |
253 | |
270 | |
274 | |
278 | |
282 | |
387 | |
401 | |
447 | |
450 | |
460 | |
467 | |
478 | |
511 | |
557 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed alimony alleged application authority bill of exceptions cause charge child Chittenden cited claim codicil Columbus Delano common carrier common law common pleas court concur constitution contest contract counsel for plaintiff Court of Appeals court of common Cuyahoga County Appeals death decree defendant in error Delano demurrer determined district duty election entitled evidence execution fact favor fendant filed follows guilty Hamilton County Appeals held Houck injury insured issue judgment jurisdiction jury Kinkade Knox County language Lucas County Appeals ment Miss McBurney motion municipal negligence Ohio St opinion ordinance parties Pennsylvania Co person plaintiff in error plea in abatement probate court proceedings prosecuted question Railway reason record refused rendered reversed rule Stark County statute street Summit County supra Supreme Court Syllabus testator thereof tion trial court trial judge verdict witnesses Zanesville
Popular passages
Page 567 - The power of the State to provide for the general welfare of its people authorizes it to prescribe all such regulations as, in its judgment, will secure or tend to secure them against the consequences of ignorance and incapacity as well as of deception and fraud.
Page 26 - ... the goods to the buyer, or to a carrier or other bailee (whether named by the buyer or not) for the purpose of transmission to or holding for the buyer, he is presumed to have unconditionally appropriated the goods to the contract, except in the cases provided for in the next rule and in section 20.
Page 590 - ... such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties, at the time they made the contract, as the probable result of the breach of it.
Page 288 - That any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any common carrier to exempt itself from any liability created by this Act, shall to that extent be void...
Page 315 - ... or defendant, unless one of the parties request it, with the view of excepting to the decision of the court upon the questions of law involved in the trial ; in which case the court shall state in writing the conclusions of fact found, separately from the conclusions of law.
Page 118 - That in any action brought against any such common carrier under or by virtue of any of the provisions of this Act, such common carrier may set off therein any sum it has contributed or paid to any insurance, relief benefit, or indemnity that may have been paid to the injured employee or the person entitled thereto on account of the injury or death for which said action was brought.
Page 117 - ... or any person seeking employment, as a condition of such employment, to enter into a contract whereby such employee or applicant for employment shall agree to contribute to any fund for charitable, social, or beneficial purposes; to release such employer from legal liability for any personal injury by reason of any benefit received from such fund beyond the proportion of the benefit arising from the employer's contribution to such fund...
Page 26 - Where there is a contract to sell unascertained or future goods by description, and goods of that description and in a deliverable state are unconditionally appropriated...
Page 614 - Amendment ; and compelling a man "in a criminal case to be a witness against himself," which is condemned in the Fifth Amendment, throws light on the question as to what is an "unreasonable search and seizure" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.
Page 588 - ... we find no error in the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant.