 That is not lawful which is: 1. Contrary to an express provision of law; 2. Contrary to the policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited; or, 3. Otherwise contrary to good morals.  The Pacific Reporter - Page 1271903Full view - About this book
 | New York (State). Commissioners of the Code - Civil law - 1862 - 412 pages
...300; see Tracy v. Albany Eich. Co., 7 NY, 474. § 540. That is not lawful which is: object nnlawful. 1. Contrary to an express provision of law ;' 2. Contrary to the policy of the law, though not expressly prohibited ;a 3. Otherwise contrary to good morals.1 1 This ia without... | |
 | Law - 1890
...will not aid parties in the enforcement of contracts thus interdicted by the law. Our Code provides: "That is not lawful which is (1) contrary to an express...of law; (2) contrary to the policy of express law, thongh not expressly prohibited or (3) otherwise contrary to good morals." Civ. Code, § 1667. Wharton... | |
 | California, California. Commission to Revise the Laws of California - California - 1871 - 781 pages
...marriage, void. What U unlawful. Cfcrtalu COO' tract* nnI'enaltiej void. Contract fixing 11' SEC. 1667. That is not lawful which is— 1. Contrary to an express...prohibited; or, 3. Otherwise contrary to good morals. ». YCC, Sec. 827. SKO. 1608. All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1872
...1667. That is not lawful which is: Whatis 1. Contrary to ail express provision of law; unlawful. game. 2. Contrary to the policy of express law, though not...prohibited; or, 3. Otherwise contrary to good morals. NOTE. — ISubd. 1. — The law makes no distinction in this respect between mahnn • prohibit um... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1876 - 589 pages
...Exception in favor of partnership arrangements. 1676. Contract in restraint of marriage, void. § 1667. That is not lawful which is : 1. Contrary to an express...express law, though not expressly prohibited ; or, § 1668. All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1876 - 589 pages
...Exception in favor of partnership arrangements. 1676. Contract in restraint of marriage, void. § 1667. That is not lawful which is: 1. Contrary to an express...Contrary to the policy of express law, though not exvessly prohibited ; or, § 1668. All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly,... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1876 - 589 pages
...Exception in favor of partnership arrangements. 1676. Contract in restraint of marriage, void. § 1667. That is not lawful which is : 1. Contrary to an express provision at law ; 2. Contrary to the policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited ; or, § 1668. All... | |
 | New York (State). - Civil law - 1885 - 404 pages
...object of which is fully performed. All others are executory. j ' TITLE IV. UNLAWFUL CONTRACTS. § 1080 That is not lawful which is : 1. Contrary to an express provision of law ; 2. Contrary to the policy of the law, though not expressly prohibited ; or, 3. Otherwise contrary to good morals. § 1081 All contracts... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1889
...sustained. Such a contract would be invalid, nnd therefore unlawful. Civ. Code, § 1667, provides: That is not lawful which is (1) contrary to an express...policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited. See Moore v. Bank of Commerce, 02 Mo. 377, 379. A banker has a general lien, dependent on possession,... | |
| |
