Page images
PDF
EPUB

Dorking Union v. St. Saviour's Union (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 594), 23, 77, ii. Driffield Gas Light Co., in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 451; 78 L.T. 162), 101, ii. Dunn v. Appleton (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 564; 78 L.T, 246), 112, iv. Durham Bros. v. Robertson (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 765; 78 L.T. 438), 96, vii.

Duthy and Jesson's Contract, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 419; 78 L.T. 223), 120, vi.

Duxbury v. Sandiford (78 L.T. 230), 106, iii.

[blocks in formation]

FELL V. THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE OF CHARITY LANDS (78 L.T. 474), 99, iv.

Field S.S. Co. v. Burr (L.R. [1898]

1 Q.B. 821; 78 L.T. 293), 117, vii. Fox v. Star Newspaper Co. (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 636; 78 L.T. 311), 112, i.

Foxwell and Others v. Van Grutten
(78 L.T. 231), 121, viii.
Friend, in re; Friend v. Young (78
L.T. 222), 122, ii.

Furness v. Beresford (York Election Petition) (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 495; 78 L.T. 137), 111, i.

GILL V. WORRALL; in re RUBBINS
(78 L.T. 218), 122, i.
Glengyle, the (L.R. [1898] P. 97; 78
L.T. 139), 117, iv.

Goetz, Jonas & Co., in re (L.R.

[1898] 1 Q.B. 787; 78 L.T. 399), 97, iv. Gregory v. Serle; in re Serle. Itter's Claim (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 652; 78 L.T. 384), 136, v.

HALL V. LAUNSPACH (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 513; 78 L.T. 243), 112, ii. Harrop v. Ossett Corporation (78 L.T. 387), 111, vi.

Hart's Divorce Bill (L.R. [1898]
A.C. 305), 105, ix.
Hemming v. Davies (L.R. [1898]
1 Q.B. 660; 78 L.T. 500), 102, vii,

High Wycombe Corporation V. Thames Conservators (78 L.T. 463), 116, iv.

Hill, Clark & Co. v. Dalgety & Co. (L.R. [1898] A.C. 343), 23, 65, i. Hill v. Crediton Urban District Council (78 L.T. 351), 115, iii. Hill v. Gage; in re Gage (L.R, [1898] 1 Ch. 498; 78 L.T. 347), 115, v.

Hobson v. Tulloch (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 424; 78 L.T. 224), 121, i. Hockey v. Western (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 350), 23, 76, i. Hollinside, the (L.R. [1898] P. 131), 118, v.

Home Marine Insurance Co. V. Smith (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 829; 78 L.T. 465), 118, iii. Hulton v. Annan (L.R. [1898] A.C. 289), 120, i.

Hummel v. Hummel (L.R. [1898]

1 Ch. 642; 78 L.T. 518), 122, v. Humphreys, in re ; e. p. Lloyd-George and Another (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 520; 78 L.T. 182), 98, i.

Hunt v. Fripp (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 675), 23, 63, iv.

JACOB V. JACOB (78 L.T. 451), 103, iv. Jennings v. Jennings (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 378), 23, 76, v.

Johnson v. Russian Spratts, Ltd.; in re the Defendants (78 L.T. 480), 100, iv.

Johnston and Others v. the Consumers' Gas Co. of Toronto (78 L.T. 270), 104, v.

Jones, in re; Richards v. Jones (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 438), 23, 88, iv. Jones v. Walters (78 L.T. 167), 102,

V.

KAYE V. CROYDON TRAMWAYS CO. (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 358; 78 L.T. 237), 100, ii.

Keck & Hart's Contract, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 617; 78 L.T. 287), 117, i.

Keeble & Stillwell's Fletton Brick Co., in re (78 L.T. 383), 120, iv. Kent Goldfields Syndicate, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 754; 78 L.T. 443), 100, iii. Kettlewell v. Kettlewell (L.R. [1898] P. 138), 23, 71, vi.

Kinnis v. Graves (78 L.T. 502), 116, i. Knight v. Langport District Drainage Board (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 588; 78 L.T. 260), 114, vii,

Knight v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (78 L.T. 227), 110, iii. Kotchie & Another V. Golden Sovereigns, Ltd. (78 L.T. 409), 105, xii.

. LANCASTER V. BARNES DISTRICT COUNCIL (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 855; 78 L.T. 355), 113, iv.

Land Mortgage Bank of Florida, Ltd., in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 444; 78 L.T. 156), 100, vii.

Leeds and Hanley Theatre of Varieties V. Broadbent (L.R. [1898]1 Ch. 343), 23, 75, iv. Leicester County Council v. Assessment Committee of Leicester (78 L.T. 463), 114, iv.

Levy v. Stogdon (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 478; 78 L.T. 185), 120, v. Lewis v. Stephenson (78 L.T. 165), 106, iv.

Liquidation Estates Purchase Co. v.

Willoughby (L.R. [1898] A.C. 321; 78 L.T. 329), 97, i.

Llewellyn v. Vale of Glamorgan Railway (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 473), 23, 80, vi. Lloyd-George, e. p. ; in re Humphreys (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 520; 78 L.T. 182), 98, i.

Lodge v. Huddersfield Corporation (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 847; 78 L.T. 422), 108, iv.

Lodge v. Huddersfield (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 859; 78 L.T. 582), 112, x. London County Council v. Edwards (78 L.T. 558), 113, vii. London County Council, e. p.; Reg. v. Justices of London (78 L.T. 559), 108, ii.

London and North-Western Railway

v. Donellan (78 L.T. 575), 114, iii. London and North-Western Railway

v. Rural District Council of Runcorn (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 561; 78 L.T. 343), 113, iii. London Tramways Co., Limited, v.

London County Council (78 L.T. 361), 111, vii.

Lowe, in the goods of (78 L.T. 566), 96, ii.

Lower Rhine and Wurtemburg Insurance Association v. Sedgwick (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 739; 78 L.T. 496), 118, vi.

MACFIE V. CALLANDER AND OBAN RAILWAY (L.R. [1898] A.C. 270), 107, ii.

Madras, the (L.R. [1898] P. 90; 78 L T. 325), 117, v.

Manchester Brewery Co. v. North Cheshire and Manchester Brewery (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 539; 78 L.T. 537), 119, v.

Mander v. Ridgway (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 501), 23, 68, v. Manners v. Pearson & Son (L.R.

[1898] 1 Ch. 581; 78 L.T. 432), 95, i. Mansfield Corporation v. Butterworth (78 L.T. 527), 108, viii. Marks v. Frogley (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 888; 78 L.T. 607), 121, iv. Martin v. Martin (78 L.T. 568), 105, vii.

Martin V. Martin and Velleman (78 L.T. 170), 112, iii.

Mayfair Property Co. in re; Bartlett v. Same Co. (78 L.T. 302), 101, iii. Maynards. Ltd., in re (L. R. [1898] 1 Ch. 515; 78 L.T. 150), 100, vi. McGuffie v. Burleigh (78 L.T. 264), 108, iii.

Meredith, in re; Stone v. Meredith (78 L.T. 492), 122, iv. Merry v. Pownell (78 L.T. 146), 23, 83, iii. Millard

v. Millard and Bastone (78 L.T. 471), 105, v. Molyneux v. Fletcher and Clarke (L.R. [1898]1 Q.B. 648), 23, 87, iii. Monkswell v. Thompson (L.R.[1898] 1 Q.B. 479), 23, 83, ii. Monson's Settled Estates, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 427; 78 L.T. 225), 116, vi. Montgomery, Jones and Company v. Liebenthal & Co. (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 487; 78 L.T. 211), 112, v. Montgomery, Jones and Company v. Liebenthal & Co., in re An Arbitration between (78 L.T. 406), 96, v.

Mundy and Roper,in re (78 L.T. 547), 116, vii.

NASH V. DIX (78 L.T. 445), 120, iii. National Dwellings Society, Ltd. (78 L.T. 144), 100, v.

New British Iron Co., Ltd., in re; e. p. Beckwith (78 L.T. 155), 23, 67, v.

New Ixion Tyre and Cycle Co., Ltd.,

v. Spilsbury (78 L.T. 543), 111, v. New Par Consols, in re (L.R. [1898]

1 Q.B. 573; 78 L.T. 312), 100, viii. New Zealand Loan and Mercantile Agency Co. v. Morrison (L.R. [1898] A.C. 349), 23, 67, ii,

Newall v. Newall and Platt (78 L.T. 203), 104, viii.

Nickels v. Nickels; in re Nickels

(L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 630; 78 L.T. 379), 119, vii.

North-Eastern Railway v. Overseers of Dalton (78 L.T. 524), 115, iv. Nussey, Ellen, in the goods of (78 L.T. 169), 121, iii.

OLYMPIA, LTD.,in re (78 L.T. 159), 101, i. Orchard v. Bush (78 L.T. 557), 105,

xi.

PAGET V. PAGET (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch.

470; 78 L.T. 306), 109, vi. Pender v. Taddei (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 798; 78 L.T. 581), 113, i. Perry Almshouses, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 391), 23, 64, iii. Petchey v. Taylor (78 L.T. 501), 96, iii. Phillips v. Owners of s.s. Ruby; the Ruby (78 L.T. 235), 23, 85, v. Piers, in re; e. p. Piers (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 627; 78 L.T. 314), 97, iii. Poyser v. Beyfus; in re Perkins (78 L.T. 216), 98, ii.

Prior v. Slaithwaite Spinning Co. (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 881; 78 L.T. 532), 103, vii.

QUEENSLAND

NATIONAL BANK V. PENINSULAR & ORIENTAL STEAM NAVIGATION CO. (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 567), 23, 84, iv.

REG. V. BOWMAN AND OTHERS (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 663; 78 L.T. 230), 107, vi.

Reg. v. Clemens (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 556; 78 L.R. 204), 109, iv. Reg. v. Cockshot and Others; e. p. Rickerby (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 582; 78 L.T. 168), 102, viii.

Reg. v. Cotham; Reg. v. Pilkington (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 802; 78 L.T. 468), 107, v.

Reg. v. Douglas and Others (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 560; 78 L.T. 198), 106, ii.

Reg. v. Humphrey (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 875; 78 L.T. 360), 104, ii. Reg. v. Justices of London; e. p. London County Council (78 L.T. 559), 108, ii.

Reg. v. Justices of West Riding; e. p. Shaw (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 503), 23, 73, v.

Reg. v. Leigh Rural Council (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B 836; 78 L.T. 604), 109, i.

Reg.v. Robinson and Others(Justices) (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 734; 78 L.T. 350), 98, iii.

Reg. v. Sharman; e. p. Denton (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 578; 78 L.T. 320), 107, iv.

Reg. v. Stewart (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 552; 78 L.T. 256), 102, iv. Richards v. Jones; in re Jones (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 438), 23, 88, iv. Ripley and Sons' Trade Mark, in re (78 L.T. 367), 119, iii.

Ripon City, the (otherwise the Silvia) (L.R. [1898] P. 78; 78 L.T. 296), 117, iii.

Ritson v. Ritson; in re Ritson (L.R.

[1898] 1 Ch. 667), 111, ii.

Roberts, in the goods of Mary Ann (L.R. [1898] P. 149; 78 L.'T. 390), 95, iv. Robinson v. Robinson (L.R. [1898] P. 153; 78 L.T. 392), 105, ii. Robinson v. Robinson and Wilson (78 L.T. 391), 105, iii.

Robinson v. Sunderland Corporation (78 L.T. 194), 108, v.

Rochdale and Haslingden Unions; in re An Arbitration between (78 L.T. 563), 109, ii.

Rochefoucauld v. Boustead (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 550), 119, viii. Rollason's Registered Design, No. 2 (78 L.T. 511), 112, ix.

Roper v. Knott (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B.
868; 78 L.T. 594), 103, i.
Royal College of Music v. Parishes
of St. Margaret and St. John,
Westminster (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B.
809; 78 L.T. 441), 114, v.
Ruabon Steamship Co. v. London
Assurance (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 722;
78 L.T. 402), 118, iv.

Ruby, the, No. 2, Phillips v. Owners
of s.s. Ruby (78 L.T. 235), 23, 85, v.
Ruby, the, Sandford
V. Stewart

(78 L.T. 267), 23, 85, iii. Rundle v. Hearle (78 L.T. 561), 104, vi.

Russell v. Russell (L.R. [1898] A.C. 307), 112, viii.

Russian Spratts, Ltd.; in re (78 L.T. 480), 100, iv.

SALE HOTEL AND BOTANICAL GARDENS, LIMITED, in re; e. p. HESKETH (78 L.T. 368), 101, v.

Salsbury v. Buckle; in re Averill (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 523; 78 L.T. 320), 121, vi.

Sandford v. Stewart; the Ruby (78 L.T. 267), 23, 85, iii,

[18511

Schwerzerhof v. Wilkins (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 640; 78 L.T. 229), 97, ii. Smith v. Richmond (L.R. [1898]

1 Q.B. 683; 78 L.T. 174), 114, viii. South African Territories, Ltd., v. Wallington (L.R. [1898] A.C. 309; 78 L.T. 426), 101, vi.

South Hetton Coal Co. v. Haswell, etc., Coal Co. (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 465; 78 L.T. 366), 119, ii. Southland Frozen Meat

Co. V. Nelson Bros. (78 L.T. 363), 96, iv. Southwark and Vauxhall Water Co. v. Hampton Urban District Council (78 L.T. 420), 115, ii. Spencer v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 643; 78 L.T. 323), 114, ii.

Spooner v. Browning (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 528), 23, 79, vi. Stephenson v. Garnett (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 677; 78 L.T. 371), 111, viii. Stevens, in the goods of (L.R. [1898] P. 126; 78 L.T. 389), 96, i. Stockport Ragged, &c., School, No. 2, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 610; 78 L.T. 290), 99, iii. Stockport Union Assessment Committee V. London and N.W. Railway (78 L.T. 180), 114, vi. Stone v. Meredith; in re Meredith (78 L.T. 492), 122, iv. Sumpter v. Hedges (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 673; 78 L.T. 378), 102, ii. Sydney Municipal Council v. Young (78 L.T. 365), 99, vi.

TATHAM, BROMAGE & Co. v. BURR (the Engineer) (78 L.T. 473), 118, iii. Taylor and Others v. Jackson (78 L.T. 555), 104, iv.

Thomas v. Roberts (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 657), 98, vi.

Thorne v. Gibbs; in re Gibbs (L.R.

[1898] 1 Ch. 625; 78 L.T. 289), 116, ii.

Trinder, Anderson & Co. v. North Queensland Insurance Co. (78 L.T. 485), 23, 20, vii.; 118, i.

VERNEY'S SETTLED ESTATES, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 508; 78 L.T. 191), 116, v.

Waikato (OWNERS OF CARGO ON BOARD) v. NEW ZEALAND SHIPPING Co. (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 645; 78 L.T. 197, 117, vi.

Waller v. Atkinson; in re Atkinson (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 637; 78 L.T. 317), 104, vii.

Ward v. Corporation of Portsmouth (78 L.T. 255), 99, ii.

Ward v. Little; in re Gyde (78 L.T. 449); 115, vi.

Warsaw, the (L.R. [1898] P. 127; 78 L.T. 327), 117, ii.

Waud, e. p.; in re Cronmire (78 L.T. 170 and 483), 104, i. Waverley Type Writer, in re; D'Esterre v. Same (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 699; 78 L.T. 593), 102, i. West v. Williams (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 488 ; 78 L.T. 147), 110, vi.

West London and General Permanent Benefit Building Society, in re (78 L.T. 393), 99, i.

V.

Westport Coal Co., Limited, McPhail (78 L.T. 490), 98, iv. White v. White (L.R. [1898] P. 124), 105, vi.

White's Charities, in re; Charity Commissioners v. London Corporation (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 659; 78 L.T. 550),121, iii. Whitwham v. Piercey; in re Piercey (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 565; 78 L.T. 277), 121, v.

Whitwham v. Watkin (78 L.T. 188), 101, iv.

Wickens v. Shuckburgh; in re Bills of Sale Act, 1882 (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 543; 78 L.T. 213), 98, v. Wingfield v. Wingfield (78 L.T. 568), 105, viii. Winstone, in the goods of (L.R. [1898] P. 143; 78 L.T. 535), 113, ii. Woodham v. London County Council (L.R. [1898] 1 Q.B. 863; 78 L.T. 553), 110, v.

Woods & Lewis's Contract, in re (L.R. [1898] 1 Ch. 433; 78 L.T. 250), 121, ii.

YOUNG V. ADAMS (78 L.T. 506), 99, vii.
Young v. Waller (78 L.T. 508), 101, i.
ZALINOFF V. HAMMOND (78 L.T. 456),
96, vi.
Le

« PreviousContinue »