Page images
PDF
EPUB

Law Magazine and Review;

A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF JURISPRUDENCE,

AND

Quarterly Digest of Reported Cases.

1828, and

Being the combined Law Magazine, founded in

Law Review, founded in 1844.

(FOURTH SERIES, Vol. XXIII., 1897-98.)

LONDON :
Wm. CLOWES AND SONS, Limited,

27, FLEET STREET, E.C.

ND

MITET

Consort Deep Level Gold Mines, | Ellis v. Wright and Others (76 L.T.

Ltd., in re; e. p. Stark (L.R. 522), 92, vi. [1897] 1 Ch. 575; 76 L.T. 800), Evans, in re; e. p. Davis (76 L.T. 95, iv.

530), 92, ii. Continental Oxygen Co., Ltd., in re;

Elias v. Continental Oxygen Co., FARRELL V. FARRELL (76 L.T. 167), Ltd. (76 L.T. 229), 95, ii.

98, vi. Coolgardie Consolidated Gold Mines, Fenner and Lord, in re an Arbitration Ltd. ; in re (76 L.T. 269), 94, i.

between (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 667; County Council of Worcestershire v. 76 L.T. 376), 104, vii.

Assessment Committee of Wor Finlay v. Darling (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. cestershire (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 719; 76 L.T. 461), 108, v. 480 ; 76 L.T. 138), 106, v.

Finlay v. Mexican Investment CorCrathie, the (L.R. (1897] P. 178; 76 poration (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 517; L.T. 534), 109, vi.

76 L.T. 257), 99, ii. Crayford, Overseers of, and District Firth v. Staines (L.R. [1897] 2 Q.B.

Council of, v. D. & C. Rutter (L.R. 70; 76 L.T. 496), 101, v. [1897] 1 Q.B. 650 ; 76 L.T. 392), Floyd v. J. Lyons & Co., Ltd. (L.R. 106, vi.

(1897] 1 Ch. 633; 76 L.T. 251),

99, iv. De Hayn V. GARLAND; in re DE Forrest v. Todd (76 L.T. 500),

LINDEN ; in re SPURRIER'S SETTLE 105, viii.
MENT (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 453; 76
L.T. 180), 100, vi.

GALLARD, in re; e. p. GALLARD (L.R. De Linden, in re; in re Spurrier ; De 11897] 2 Q.B. 8; 76 L.T. 327),

Hayn v. Garland (L.R. (1897) 1 91, iii.

Ch. 453; 76 L.T. 180), 100, vi. Game v. Young; in re Game (L.R. Derbyshire v. Montagu; in re Montagu [1897] 1 Ch. 881; 76 L.T. 450),

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 685 and 2 Ch. 112, vi.

8; 76 L.T. 289 and 485), 108, iv. Goldstein v. Vaughan (L.R. (1897] Devonshire (Duke of) v. Stokes (76 1 Q.B. 549; 76 L.T. 262), 97, iii. L.T. 424), 102, i.

Goodlock v. Cousins (L.R. [1897] Dodd v. Churton (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 1 Q.B. 558; 76 L.T. 313), 96, v. 562; 76 L.T. 438), 96, i.

Graham v. Sutton & Co. (L.R. Donnisthorpe's Claim and the Man. | 1897] 1 Ch. 716; 76 L.T. 369),

chester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire 105, iii. Railway (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 671 ; Grosvenor and West End Railway 76 L.T. 371), 104, vi.

Terminus Hotel Co., Ltd., in re Duff v. Hawker; in re Hawker's (76 L.T. 337), 95, vi.

Settled Estates (76 L.T. 286), 108, iii.

HAMINI AND OTHERS V. TILLEKERATNE Duncan v. Dowding and Others (L.R. 1897] A.C. 277; 76 L.T.

(L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 575 ; 76 L.T. 210), 93, vi. 294), 99, vii.

Harris v. Sleep (76 L.T. 458), Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co., Ltd. 105, vi.

V. New Seddon Pneumatic Tyre .Hawke v. Dunn (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. and Self-Closing Tube Co., Ltd. 579; 76 L.T. 355), 97, vii. (76 L.T. 405), 102, vii.

Hawker's Settled Estates, in re; Dunn v. Macdonald (L.R. [18971 1 Duff v. Hawker (76 L.T. 286), Q.B. 555 ; 76 L.T. 444), 105, ix.

108, iii. Durrant v. the Branksome Urban Hawley, in re; e. p. Ridgway (76

District Council (76 L.T. 486), L.T. 501), 91, vi. 106, i.

Hayward v. Hayward ; in re Hayward

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 905; 76 L.T. EARL COWLEY, in re Estate Duty | 383), 91, v.

PAYABLE ON THE DEATH OF THE
SECOND (76 L.T. 567), 107, ii.

[1897] 2 Ch. 55 ; 76 LT 417), Edison General Electric Co. v. West. 97, iv.

minster and Vancouver Tramway Hodgkins v. Sinclair (76 L.T. 452),

Co. (L.R.[18977 A.C.193), 22,58, ii. 1 90, ii. Elias v. Continental Oxygeń Co. | Hood v. Attorney-General; in re

(L.R. (1897) 1 Ch. 511; 76 L.T. Hunter (L.R. (1897) 1 Ch. 518; 229), 95, ii.

76 L.T. 386), 112, iii.

Hood - Barrs v. Crossman and 1 Magnolia Metal Co.'s Trade Marks,

Prichard (L.R .[1897] A.C. 172; 1 in re (76 L.T. 190), 110, iv. 76 L.T. 297), 104, iv.

Manders v. Manders (L.R. (1897) Hood-Barrs v. Heriot (second appeal) 1 Q.B. 474), 98, iv.

(L.R. (1897] A.C. \177; 76 L.T. I Marlborough (Duke of) v. Queen 299), 104, v.

Anne's Bounty (Governors of), in Hopcraft v. Hopcraft (76 L.T. 341), re (L.R. [1897) 1 Ch. 712; 76 L.T. 111, i.

388), 108, vi. Hornsey District Council v. Smith Master in Equity of Supreme Court

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 843; 76 L.T., of Victoria v. Pearson (L.R. (1897] 431), 102, v.

A.C. 214), 22, 58, iii. Huddersfield Corporation v. Ravens Mayflower, 'the Log of the (76 L.T. thorpe Urban District Council 295), 106, vii. (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 652; 76 L.T. McCall and Co., Ltd., v. Houlder and 377), 100, iii.

Co. (76 L.T. 469), 109, vii. Humphreys v. Gadsden; in re Cosier McInany v. Hildrith (L.R. (1897]

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 325; 76 L.T. | 1 Q.B. 600; 76 L.T. 463), 97, vi. 31), 112, vii.

Meates v. Bishop; in re North (76

L.T. 186), 112, i. JENKINS, in the goods of ; JENKINS v. Minna Craig Steamship Co. v. JENKINS (76 L.T. 164), 103, vii.

Chartered Mercantile Bank of Jenks v. Clifden (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. India, London, and China (L.R. 694; 76 L.T. 382), 89, i.

[1897] 1 Q.B. 460; 76 L.T. 310), John O'Scot, the (L.R. (1897] P. 64; 22, 44, ii.; 97, v. 76 L.T. 222), 109, i.

Montague, in re; e. p. Ward v. Joseph v. Joseph and Burnhill London and South Western Bank (76 L.T. 236), 104, ii.

(76 L.T. 203), 91, ii. Judkins v. Judkins (76 L.T. 169 and Morter, in re ; e. p. Nicholls (76 L.T. 409), 22, 62, ii.

532), 92, iv.

Mountfield v. Ward (76 L.T. 202), KENNEDY V. DE TRAFFORD (L.R. [1897) 22, 67, i.

A.C. 180; 76 L.T. 427), 102, iv. Koosen v. Rose (76 L.T. 145), 103, iv. NEw Moss COLLIERY Co. v. Man

CHESTER, SHEFFIELD AND LINCOLN-LAMOND V. RICHARD (L.R. (1897]1 Q.B. SHIRE RAILWAY (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch.

541; 76 L.T. 141), 22, 65, ii. ; 99, i. 725 ; 76 L.T. 231), 93, i. Larocque v. Beauchemin and Others New, Prance, and Garrard, Trustee

(L.R. [1897] A.C. 358; 76 L.T. of, v. Hunting and Others (L.R. 473), 93, iv.

[1897] 1 Q.B. 607; 76 L.T. 196), Lazarus v. Artistic Photographic 90, v.

Co., Ltd. (76 L.T. 457), 97, ii. Nicholson v. Rhodesia Trading Co., Lewis v. Powell (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. L Ltd. (L.R. (1897) 1 Ch. 434; 76 678; 76 L.T. 282), 104, iii.

L.T 147), 94, vi. Lilley, Frederick G., in the goods of North, in re; Meates v. Bishop (76 (76 L.T. 164), 103, v.

L.T. 186), 112, i. Liverpool General Brokers' Associa

tion, Ltd., v. Commercial Press PARKER V. OSBORNE; in re PARKER Telegram Bureaux (L.R. (1897] (76 L.T. 421), 112, v.

2 Q.B. 1; 76 L.T. 292), 96, iv. Pearce v. Gardner (L.R. [1897] Lord Advocate v. Robertson (76 L.T. 1 Q.B. 688; 76 L.T. 441), 96, ii. 125), 108, i.

Peebles v. Oswaldtwistle Urban London and County Banking Co. v. District Council (L.R. (1897]

Goddard (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 642; 1 Q.B. 625; 76 L.T. 315), 76 L.T. 277), 102, iii.

106, ii.

Phillips, in re; e. p. Thomas and Co. M. v. M. (otherwise A.) (76 L.T. 172), (76 L.T. 531), 92, iii. 98, viii.

Plant v. Bourne (76 L.T. 349), 111, Macmillan v. Australasian Terri iii.

tories, Ltd., and Others (76 L.T. Pomeroy v. Tanner, No. 2, in re (76 182), 103, viii.

L.T. 149), 110, ii. Madeley v. Ross, Sleeman & Co. | Pratt v. South Eastern Railway Co.

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 505 ; 76 L.T. (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 718; 76 L.T. 321), 94, ii.

465), 106, iii.

LOS 2.B. 1; 76 ureaux (L.R, Press

Priestley v. Ellis (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch.1 District Council (76 L.T. 318), 489; 76 L.T. 187), 108, vii.

104, viii. Pritchett v. Poole (76 L.T. 472), 96, vi. Sprigg v. Sigcau (L.R. (1897] A.C.

238; 76 L.T. 127), 93, v. RAAtz, in re; e. p. CARLHIAN (76 L.T. Stileman-Gibbard v. Wilkinson and 330), 105, i.

Others (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 749 ; Raatz, in re ; e. p. Raatz (L.R. (1897] 76 L.T. 90), 22, 63, i.

2 Q.B. 80; 76 L.T. 503), 91, viii. St. Olave's Union v. Canterbury Ratata, the (L.R. [1897] P. 118; Union (L.R. (1897) 1 Q.B. 682; 76 L.T. 224), 109, ii.

76 L.T. 88 and 517), 103, ii. Reg. v. Charity Commissioners for Swabey, in re ; e. p. Swabey (76 L.T.

England and Wales (76 L.T. 199), 534), 92, v.

22, 68, ii. Reg. 'v. Clerk of Assize of Oxford TADCASTER TOWER BREWERY Co. v.

Circuit (76 L.T. 260), 22, 62, i. Wilson (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 705 ; Reg. v. Commissioners of Lunacy 76 L.T. 459), 110, iii.

(L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 630; 76 L.T. Tate v. Latham & Sons (76 L.T. 336), 353), 100, v.

101, iii. Reg. v. Lewisham Union (L.R. [1897] Thomas V. Foster ; in re Foster | 1 Q.B. 498 ; 76 L.T. 324), 104, ix. | (L.R. [1897) 1 Ch. 484 ; 76 L.T. Reg. v. London County Council 228), 107, i. (76 L.T. 472), 101, i.

Thompson v. Redding; in re Redding Reg. v. London (Justices of) (L.R. (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 876; 76 L.T. (1897) 1 Q.B. 433), 106, iv.

339), 112, ii. Reg. v. Pelly and” Another (L.R. | Toleman, in re; Westwood v. Booker

[1897] 2 Q.B. 33; 76 L.T. 467), (L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 866; 76 L.T. 100, i.

381), 105, iv. Reg. v. Turner (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. Trevor v. Hutchins (76 L.T. 183), 445; 76 L.T. 556), 96, vii.

100, ii. Ridgway, e.p.; in ré Hawley (76 L.T. 501), 91, vi.

WALKER v. WALKER AND LAWSON Roberts, in re; Knight v. Roberts (76 L.T. 235), 104, i. (76 L.T. 479), 89, i.

Ward v. London and South Western Rumney and Smith's Contract Bank; in re Montague (76 L.T. (76 L.T. 343), 111, ii.

203), 91, ii.

Welton v. Saffery (L.R. (1897) A.C. SALISBURY GOLD MINING Co. v. 299; 76 L.T. 505), 94, iv.

HATHORN AND OTHERS (L.R. [1897] Western Counties Steam Bakeries A.C. 268; 76 L.T. 212), 93, vii.

and Milling Co., Ltd., in re; e. p. Saunders v. Gore; in re Saunders Parsons and Robjent (L.R. (1897]

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 888; 76 L.T. 1 Ch. 617; 76 L.T. 239), 22, 60, 345), 107, vii.

vi. ; 95, iii. Saunders v. Saunders (L.R. [18971 White v. Southend Hotel Co., Ltd. P. 89; 76 L.T. 330), 98, ii.

(L.R. (1897] 1 Ch. 767; 76 L.T. Scowby v. Scowby ; in re Scowby 273), 99, v.

L.R. (1897] 1 Ch.741; 76 L.T. 363), Wiesener v. Rackow (76 L.T. 448), 105, ii.

90, iii. Seaward v. Paterson (L.R. [1897] Wilding v. Sanderson (76 L.T. 346),

1 Ch. 545 ; 76 L.T. 215), 95, vii. 102, ii. Simpson v. Hughes and Armstrong Wilkinson and Wife v. Downson

(76 L.T. 237), 22, 61, iii. ; 110, vi. (L.R. (1897] 2 Q.B. 57; 76 L.T. Slater, in re; e. p. Slater (76 L.T. 493), 100, vii. 529), 92, i.

Williams v. Goose (L.R.[1897]1 Q.B. Small and Others v. United Kingdom 471; 76 L.T. 143), 103, iii. Mutual Insurance Co. (L.R. (1897) Williams v. Grant (76 L.T. 150),

2 Q.B. 42 ; 76 L.T. 326), 109, iv. 101, ii. Smith v. Batsford (76 L.T. 179), Wilmot v. Betterton ; in re Wilmot 110, v.

(76 L.T. 415), 112, iv. South African Territories v. Wal Woodroof, in re; e. p. Woodroof

lington (L.R. (1897] 1 Q.B. 692; (76 L.T. 502), 91, vii. 76 L.T. 520), 96, iii."

Wragg, E. J., Ltd., in re (L.R. (1897) Southport (Mayor, Aldermen and | 1 Ch. 796 ; 76 L.T. 397), 94, iii.

Burgesses of) v. Birkdale Urban

Law Magazine and Review;

A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF JURISPRUDENCE,

AND

Quarterly Digest of Reported Cases.

1828, and

Being the combined Law Magazine, founded in

Law Rebiew, founded in 1844.

(FOURTH SERIES, Vol. XXIII., 1897-98.)

LONDON:
Wm. CLOWES AND SONS, LIMITED,

27, FLEET STREET, E.C.

« PreviousContinue »