Page images
PDF
EPUB

Law Magazine and Review;

A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF JURISPRUDENCE,

AND

Quarterly Digest of Reported Cases.

Being the combined Law Magazine, founded in 1828, and Law Review, founded in 1844.

(FOURTH SERIES, VOL. XXIII., 1897-98.)

WM. CLOWES

LONDON:

AND SONS, LIMITED,

27, FLEET STREET, E.C.

Consort Deep Level Gold Mines, Ltd., in re ; e. p. Stark (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 575; 76 L.T. 300), 95, iv. Continental Oxygen Co., Ltd., in re; Elias v. Continental Oxygen Co., Ltd. (76 L.T. 229), 95, ii. Coolgardie Consolidated Gold Mines, Ltd.; in re (76 L.T. 269), 94, i. County Council of Worcestershire v. Assessment Committee of Worcestershire (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 480; 76 L.T. 138), 106, v. Crathie, the (L.R. [1897] P. 178; 76 L.T. 534), 109, vi.

Crayford, Overseers of, and District

Council of, v. D. & C. Rutter (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 650; 76 L.T. 392), 106, vi.

DE HAYN V. GARLAND; in re DE LINDEN; in re SPURRIER'S SETTLEMENT (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 453; 76 L.T. 180), 100, vi.

De Linden, in re; in re Spurrier; De Hayn v. Garland (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 453; 76 L.T. 180), 100, vi Derbyshire v. Montagu; in re Montagu (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 685 and 2 Ch. 8; 76 L.T. 289 and 485), 108, iv. Devonshire (Duke of) v. Stokes (76 L.T. 424), 102, i.

Dodd v. Churton (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 562; 76 L.T. 438), 96, i. Donnisthorpe's Claim and the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire Railway (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 671; 76 L.T. 371), 104, vi.

Duff v. Hawker; in re Hawker's Settled Estates (76 L.T. 286), 108, iii.

Duncan v. Dowding and Others (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 575; 76 L.T. 294), 99, vii.

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co., Ltd.

v. New Seddon Pneumatic Tyre and Self-Closing Tube Co., Ltd. (76 L.T. 405), 102, vii. Dunn v. Macdonald (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 555; 76 L.T. 444), 105, ix. Durrant v. the Branksome Urban District Council (76 L.T. 486), 106, i.

EARL COWLEY, in re ESTATE DUTY

PAYABLE ON THE DEATH OF THE

SECOND (76 L.T. 567), 107, ii. Edison General Electric Co. v. Westminster and Vancouver Tramway Co. (L.R. [1897] A.C. 193), 22, 58, ii. Elias v. Continental Oxygen Co. (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 511; 76 L.T. 229), 95, ii.

Ellis v. Wright and Others (76 L.T. 522), 92, vi.

Evans, in re; e. p. Davis (76 L.T. 530), 92, ii.

FARRELL V. FARRELL (76 L.T. 167), 98, vi.

Fenner and Lord, in re an Arbitration between (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 667; 76 L.T. 376), 104, vii.

Finlay v. Darling (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 719; 76 L.T. 461), 108, v. Finlay v. Mexican Investment Corporation (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 517; 76 L.T. 257), 99, ii.

Firth v. Staines (L.R. [1897] 2 Q.B. 70; 76 L.T. 496), 101, v. Floyd v. J. Lyons & Co., Ltd. (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 633; 76 L.T. 251), 99, iv.

Forrest v. Todd (76 L.T. 500), 105, viii.

GALLARD, in re; e. p. GALLARD (L.R. [1897] 2 Q.B. 8; 76 L.T. 327), 91, iii.

Game v. Young; in re Game (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 881; 76 L.T. 450), 112, vi. Goldstein v. Vaughan (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 549; 76 L.T. 262), 97, iii. Goodlock v. Cousins (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 558; 76 L.T. 313), 96, v. Graham v. Sutton & Co. (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 716; 76 L.T. 369), 105, iii. Grosvenor and West End Railway Terminus Hotel Co., Ltd., in re (76 L.T. 337), 95, vi.

HAMINI AND OTHERS V. TILLEKERATNE (L.R. [1897] A.C. 277; 76 L.T. 210), 93, vi.

Harris v. Sleep (76 L.T. 458), 105, vi.

Hawke v. Dunn (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 579; 76 L.T. 355), 97, vii. Hawker's Settled Estates, in re; Duff v. Hawker (76 L.T. 286), 108, iii.

Hawley, in re; e. p. Ridgway (76 L.T. 501), 91, vi.

Hayward v. Hayward; in re Hayward (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 905; 76 L.T. 383), 91, v.

Hill (Viscount) v. Bullock (L.R. [1897] 2 Ch. 55; 76 L.T. 417), 97, iv.

Hodgkins v. Sinclair (76 L.T. 452), 90, ii.

Hood v. Attorney-General; in re Hunter (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 518; 76 L.T. 386), 112, iii.

Hood - Barrs V. Crossman and Prichard (L.R.[1897] A.C. 172; 76 L.T. 297), 104, iv. Hood-Barrs v. Heriot (second appeal) (L.R. [1897] A.C. 177; 76 L.T. 299), 104, v.

Hopcraft v. Hopcraft (76 L.T. 341), 111, i.

Hornsey District Council v. Smith

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 843; 76 L.T. 431), 102, v.

Huddersfield Corporation v. Ravensthorpe Urban District Council (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 652; 76 L.T. 377), 100, iii.

Humphreys v. Gadsden; in re Cosier (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 325; 76 L.T. 31), 112, vii.

JENKINS, in the goods of; JENKINS V.

JENKINS (76 L.T. 164), 103, vii. Jenks v. Clifden (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 694; 76 L.T. 382), 89, i.

John O'Scot, the (L.R. [1897] P. 64; 76 L.T. 222), 109, i.

Joseph v. Joseph and Burnhill (76 L.T. 236), 104, ii.

Judkins v. Judkins (76 L.T. 169 and 409), 22, 62, ii.

KENNEDY V. DE TRAFFORD (L.R. [1897]

A.C. 180; 76 L.T. 427), 102, iv. Koosen v. Rose (76 L.T. 145), 103, iv.

LAMOND V. RICHARD (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B.

541; 76 L.T. 141), 22, 65, ii. ; 99, i. Larocque v. Beauchemin and Others (L.R. [1897] A.C. 358; 76 L.T. 473), 93, iv. Lazarus v. Artistic Photographic Co., Ltd. (76 L.T. 457), 97, ii. Lewis v. Powell (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 678; 76 L.T. 282), 104, iii. Lilley, Frederick G., in the goods of (76 L.T. 164), 103, v. Liverpool General Brokers' Associa tion, Ltd., v. Commercial Press Telegram Bureaux (L.R. [1897] 2 Q.B. 1; 76 L.T. 292), 96, iv. Lord Advocate v. Robertson (76 L.T. 125), 108, i.

London and County Banking Co. v. Goddard (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 642; 76 L.T. 277), 102, iii.

M. v. M. (otherwise A.) (76 L.T. 172), 98, viii.

Macmillan v. Australasian Territories, Ltd., and Others (76 L.T. 182), 103, viii.

Madeley v. Ross, Sleeman & Co. (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 505; 76 L.T. 321), 94, ii.

[ocr errors]

Magnolia Metal Co.'s Trade Marks, in re (76 L.T. 190), 110, iv.

Manders v. Manders (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 474), 98, iv.

Marlborough (Duke of) v. Queen Anne's Bounty (Governors of), in re (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 712; 76 L.T. 388), 108, vi.

Master in Equity of Supreme Court of Victoria v. Pearson (L.R. [1897] A.C. 214), 22, 58, iii.

Mayflower, the Log of the (76 L.T. 295), 106, vii.

McCall and Co., Ltd., v. Houlder and Co. (76 L.T. 469), 109, vii. McInany v. Hildrith (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 600; 76 L.T. 463), 97, vi. Meates v. Bishop; in re North (76 L.T. 186), 112, i.

Minna Craig Steamship Co. V. Chartered Mercantile Bank of India, London, and China (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 460; 76 L.T. 310), 22, 44, ii.; 97, v. Montague, in re;

e. p. Ward v.

London and South Western Bank (76 L.T. 203), 91, ii.

Morter, in re; e. p. Nicholls (76 L.T. 532), 92, iv.

Mountfield v. Ward (76 L.T. 202), 22, 67, i.

NEW MOSS COLLIERY Co. v. MANCHESTER, SHEFFIELD AND LINCOLN-SHIRE RAILWAY (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 725; 76 L.T. 231), 93, i. New, Prance, and Garrard, Trustee of, v. Hunting and Others (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 607; 76 L.T. 196), 90, v.

Nicholson v. Rhodesia Trading Co., Ltd. (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 434; 76 L.T 147), 94, vi.

North, in re; Meates v. Bishop (76 L.T. 186), 112, i.

PARKER V. OSBORNE; in re PARKER (76 L.T. 421), 112, v. Pearce v. Gardner (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 688; 76 L.T. 441), 96, ii. Peebles v. Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 625; 76 L.T. 315), 106, ii. Phillips, in re; e. p. Thomas and Co.

(76 L.T. 531), 92, iii.

Plant v. Bourne (76 L.T. 349), 111, iii.

Pomeroy v. Tanner, No. 2, in re (76 L.T. 149), 110, ii.

Pratt v. South Eastern Railway Co. (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 718; 76 L.T. 465), 106, iii.

Priestley v. Ellis (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch.

489; 76 L.T. 187), 108, vii. Pritchett v. Poole (76 L.T. 472), 96, vi.

RAATZ, in re; e. p. CARLHIAN (76 L.T. 330), 105, i.

Raatz, in re; e. p. Raatz (L.R. [1897]

2 Q.B. 80; 76 L.T. 503), 91, viii. Ratata, the (L.R. [1897] P. 118; 76 L.T. 224), 109, ii.

Reg. v. Charity Commissioners for England and Wales (76 L.T. 199), 22, 68, ii.

Reg. v. Clerk of Assize of Oxford Circuit (76 L.T. 260), 22, 62, i. Reg. v. Commissioners of Lunacy (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 630; 76 L.T. 353), 100, v.

Reg. v. Lewisham Union (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 498; 76 L.T. 324), 104, ix. Reg. v. London County Council (76 L.T. 472), 101, i.

Reg. v. London (Justices of) (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 433), 106, iv. Reg. v. Pelly and Another (L.R. [1897] 2 Q.B. 33; 76 L.T. 467), 100, i.

Reg. v. Turner (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 445; 76 L.T. 556), 96, vii. Ridgway, e. p.; in re Hawley (76 L.T. 501), 91, vi.

Roberts, in re; Knight v. Roberts (76 L.T. 479), 89, ii. Rumney and Smith's

(76 L.T. 343), 111, ii.

Contract

SALISBURY GOLD MINING Co.

V.

HATHORN AND OTHERS (L.R. [1897] A.C. 268; 76 L.T. 212), 93, vii. Saunders v. Gore; in re Saunders (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 888; 76 L.T. 345), 107, vii.

Saunders v. Saunders (L.R. [1897]
P. 89; 76 L.T. 330), 98, ii.
Scowby v. Scowby; in re Scowby
L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 741; 76 L.T. 363),
105, ii.

Seaward v. Paterson (L.R. [1897]
1 Ch. 545; 76 L.T. 215), 95, vii.
Simpson v. Hughes and Armstrong
(76 L.T. 237), 22, 61, iii.; 110, vi.
Slater, in re; e. p. Slater (76 L.T.
529), 92, i.
Small and Others v. United Kingdom
Mutual Insurance Co. (L.R. [1897]
2 Q.B. 42; 76 L.T. 326), 109, iv.
Smith v. Batsford (76 L.T. 179),
110, v.

South African Territories v. Wallington (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 692; 76 L.T. 520), 96, iii. Southport (Mayor, Aldermen and Burgesses of) v. Birkdale Urban

District Council (76 L.T. 318), 104, viii.

Sprigg v. Sigcau (L.R. [1897] A.C. 238; 76 L.T. 127), 93, v. Stileman-Gibbard v. Wilkinson and Others (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 749; 76 L.T. 90), 22, 63, i.

St. Olave's Union v. Canterbury Union (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 682; 76 L.T. 88 and 517), 103, ii. Swabey, in re; e. p. Swabey (76 L.T. 534), 92, v.

TADCASTER TOWER BREWERY Co. v. WILSON (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 705; 76 L.T. 459), 110, iii.

Tate v. Latham & Sons (76 L.T. 336), 101, iii.

Thomas v. Foster; in re Foster

(L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 484; 76 L.T. 228), 107, i. Thompson v. Redding; in re Redding (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 876; 76 L.T. 339), 112, ii.

Toleman, in re; Westwood v. Booker (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 866; 76 L.T. 381), 105, iv.

Trevor v. Hutchins (76 L.T. 183), 100, ii.

WALKER V. WALKER AND LAWSON

(76 L.T. 235), 104, i.

Ward v. London and South Western Bank; in re Montague (76 L.T. 203), 91, ii.

Welton v. Saffery (L.R. [1897] A.C. 299; 76 L.T. 505), 94, iv. Western Counties Steam Bakeries and Milling Co., Ltd., in re; e. p. Parsons and Robjent (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 617; 76 L.T. 239), 22, 60, vi.; 95, iii.

White v. Southend Hotel Co., Ltd. (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 767; 76 L.T. 273), 99, v.

Wiesener v. Rackow (76 L.T. 448), 90, iii.

Wilding v. Sanderson (76 L.T. 346), 102, ii.

Wilkinson and Wife v. Downson (L.R. [1897] 2 Q.B. 57; 76 L.T. 493), 100, vii.

Williams v. Goose (L.R. [1897] 1 Q.B. 471; 76 L.T. 143), 103, iii. Williams v. Grant (76 L.T. 150), 101, ii.

Wilmot v. Betterton; in re Wilmot (76 L.T. 415), 112, iv. Woodroof, in re; e. p. Woodroof (76 L.T. 502), 91, vii. Wragg, E. J., Ltd., in re (L.R. [1897] 1 Ch. 796; 76 L.T. 397), 94, iii.

Law Magazine and Review;

A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF JURISPRUDENCE,

AND

Quarterly Digest of Reported Cases.

Being the combined Law Magazine, founded in 1828, and Labo Review, founded in 1844.

(FOURTH SERIES, VOL. XXIII., 1897-98.)

WM. CLOWES

LONDON:

AND SONS, LIMITED,

27, FLEET STREET, E.C.

« PreviousContinue »