Page images
PDF
EPUB

Newton, in re (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 740) | Portland Urban District Council and (60, vi., ante),

Tilley & Co., in re (L.R. (1896] 2 New Union Mills Co. v. Great Q.B. 98; 74 L.T. 703), 21, ix.

Western Ry. (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. Powell v. Birmingham Vinegar 290; 74 L.T. 791), 25, i.

Brewery Co. (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 54; Nichols v. North Metropolitan 74 L.T. 509), 32, iii.

Railway and Canal Co. (74 L.T. | Pugh v. London, Brighton, and 744) 30, iii.

South Coast Railway (L.R. (1896) Nobel's Explosives Co. v. Jenkins 2 Q.B. 248; 74 L.T. 724), 15, i.

and Co. (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 326 ; 75 L.T. 163), 30, i.

REES v. BERNARDY (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. Norton v. Dashwood (L.R. (1896] 2 437; 74 L.T. 585), 4, iv. Ch. 497), 12, vii.

Reg. v. Bexley Heath Railway Co. Nourse v. Liverpool Sailing Ship. (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 74; 74 L.T.

owners Mutual Protection and 540), 25, iii. Indemnity Association (L.R.[1896] Reg. v. Chambers (75 L.T. 76), 10, vi. 2 Q.B. 16; 74 L.T. 317 and 543), Reg. v. Erdheim (L.R. (1896) 2 Q.B. 29, viii.

260; 74 L.T. 734), 10, v.

Reg. v. Hopkins and Ferguson (L.R. Ophan Bros. v. BRUNNING (74 L.T. [1896] 1 Q.B. 652), 10, iii. 370), 22, iv.

Reg. v. Jameson and Others (75 L.T. Ogston v. Stewart (L.R. (1896] A.C. 77), 9, vii. 120), 10, vii.

Reg. v. Kent (Justices of)(L.R.518967 Oldroyd v. Oldroyd (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. 1; 74 L.T. 618 and 75 P. 175), 11, iii.

L.T. 11), 15, viii. Ontario (Attorney-General for) v. Reg. v. Lewis and Moss (L.R. (1896)

Attorney-General for the Dominion i Q.B. 665 ; 74 L.T. 551), 34, iii. (L.R. (1896] A.C. 348; 74 L.T. Reg. v. Lillyman (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. 533), 5, i.

167; 74 L.T. 730), 10, iv. Osborne v. Chocqueel (L.R. [1896] Reg. v. London and North-Western

2 Q.B. 109; 74 L.T. 786), 2, iv. Railway (74 L.T. 624), 20, v. Otway v. Langham ; re Langham Reg. v. London (Justices of) (L.R. (74 L.T. 611), 27, iii.

(1896] 1 Q.B. 659 ; 74 L.T. 523), Overton & Co. v. Burn Lowe & Sons

3, ii. (74 L.T. 776), 21, vii.

Reg. v. Payne and Cooper (L.R.

(1896] 1 Q.B. 577; 74 L.T. 351), Page v. Ratliffe (74 L.T. 124), 10, ii. 20, ii.

Reg. v. Slade ; e. p. Robinson (74 Pain v. Bowden (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. L.T. 656), 19, vii. 301; 75 L.T. 102), 9, v.

Reg. v. Smith (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B, Paterson v. Gas, Light and Coke Co. 596; 74 L.T. 340), 2, iii.

(L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 476; 74 L.T. Reg. v. Soden (L.R. [1896] 1 Q.B. 640), 13, ii.

634; 74 L.T. 520), 12, viii. Peebles y. The Oswaldtwistle Urban Reg. v. St. Matthew, Bethnal Green

District Council (L.R. [1896] 2 (Vestry of) (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 95 Q.B. 159 ; 74 L.T. '721), 22, i.

and 319; 74 L.T. 701 and 75 L.T. Pertwee v. Townsend (L.R. (1896) 60),

2 Q.B. 129; 75 L.T. 104), 25, vii. Reg. v. St. Matthew, Bethnal Green Phillips v. Evans (L.R. (1896] 1 (Vestry of) (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 95 Q.B. 305 ; 74 L.T. 314), 26, vii.

and 319; 75 L.T. 60), 18, iv. Phillips, re; e. p. Treboeth Brick Co. | Reg. v. Tynemouth Rural District

(L.R. (1896) 2 Q.B. 122), 23, vii. Council (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. 219; Pledge v. White (L.R. (1896] A.C. | 75 L.T. 86), 16, iii. 187; 74 L.T. 323), 19, ii.

Reg. v. Webb and Others (Justices Pollard's Settlement, in re (L.R. and Grove) (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B.

[1896] 1 Ch. 901 and 2 Ch. 552; 487; 74 L.T. 428), 4, ii. 74 L.T. 374 and 75 L.T. 116), 17, Reid (in the goods of) (L.R. (1896) iv.

P. 129 ; 74 L.T. 462), 24, ii. Poppleton v. Jones' Contract, re Remfry v. Surveyor - General of (74 L.T. 582), 34, i.

Natal (75 L.T. 58), 5, iv.

Reynolds & Co. v. Tomlinson (L.R., Smith v. Stuart; re Stuart (74 L.T.

(1896] 1 Q.B. 586 ; 74 L.T. 591), 546), 23, ii. 28, iv.

South African Trust and Finance Reynolds v. Urban District Council Co., Ltd., re; e. p. Hirsch & Co.

of Presteign (L.R. [1896] 1 Q.B. (74 L.T. 769), 6, v. 604; 74 L.T. 422), 17, vii.

South Staffordshire Water Co. v. Rhymney Iron Co. v. Fowler (L.R. Sharman (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. 44; [1896] 2 Q.B, 79), 26, iii.

74 L.T. 761), 11, i. Richards v. Kidderminster Mayor | Sowerby Urban District Council and

of) (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 212 ; 74 the Mytholmroyd Urban District L.T. 483),

Council (74 L.T. 313), 16, ix. Richards v. Kidderminster (Over Spiers and Pond v. Barrett (L.R.

seers of) (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 212; [1896] 2 Q.B. 65; 74 L.T. 697), 2, ii. 74 L.T. 483), 7, v.

Staples v. Eastman Photographic Richmond Hill Steamship Co. v. Materials Co. (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch.

Corporation of Trinity House 303; 74 L.T. 479), 7, vi. (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. 493 and 2 Q.B. Stokell v. Heywood (74 L.T. 781), 134; 74 L.T. 380 and 75 L.T. 8), 15, ii. 29, ii.

Stuart and Olivant and Seadon's Robinson v. Harkin (L.R. (18967 Contract, in re (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 2 Ch. 415; 74 L.T. 777), 33, ii.

328; 74 L.T. 450), 33, vi. Rochefoucauld v. Boustead (74 L.T. 783), 30, ii.

THE V. V. BREAD Co. v. STUBBS Rowland (v. Michell (75 L.T. 65), (74 L.T. 704), 12, vi. 31, iv.

Thomson v. Thomson (74 L.T. 801), Ruck v. Ruck (L.R. (1896] P. 152), 17, iii. 11, vii.

Tottenham v. Tottenham; in re Rudá v. Jones (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. Tottenham (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch.628; · 554 ; 74 L.T. 714), 13, i.

74 L.T. 376), 22, x. Rutland, the (75 L.T. 48), 28, vi. Trevor v. Hutchins (L.R. (1896)

1 Ch. 844; 74 L.T. 470), 1, vi. SADLER V. GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY Truman v. Pope; re Dudgeon (74 L.T. (74 L.T. 561), 23, iv.

613), 4, v. Salter v. Salter (75 L.T. 7), 21, vi. Tunbridge Wells (Mayor of) v. Baird Sass, in re; e. p. National Provincial and Others (74 L.T. 385), 16, viii.

Bank of England (L.R. (1896] 2 Turner v. Watson; in re Watson Q.B. 12; 74 L.T. 383), 3, vii.

(L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 925; 74 L.T. Saul (in the goods of) (L.R. (1896] P. i 453), 12, v.

151), 24, iv. Savoy (Overseers, &c., of the) v. Art' UNITED KINGDOM MUTUAL STEAMSHIP

Union of London (L.R. (1896] ASSOCIATION 5. HOUSTON & Co. A.C. 296 ; 74 L.T. 497), 20, iii.

(L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. 567), 2, vi. Scott, in re; e. p. Lewis (L.R. (1896) Universal Stock Exchange Co., 1 Q.B. 619; 74 L.T. 555), 3, v.

Ltd. v. Strachan (L.R. (1896) A.C. Seaman v. Burley (L.R. [1896] 2: 166 ; 74 L.T. 468), 31, ii.

Q.B. 344; 75 L.T. 91), 21, i. Sharland, re; Kemp v. Rozey, No. 2 VEUVE MONNIER ET SES FILS, LTD.; e.p. (74 L.T. 664), 34, vii.

BLOOMENTHAL (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. Simonds v. Huntingdon; re Searancke 525 ; 74 L.T. 670), 7, i. (74 L.T. 339), 27, vi.

Von Linden (in the goods of) (L.R. Smelting Co. of Australia, Ltd., v. [1896] P. 148), 24. iii.

Commissioners of Inland Revenue (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 179; 74 L.T. WARD, re (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 31; 694), 26, vi.

74 L.T. 567), 31, i. Smith v. Gill (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. | Watson v. White (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 166), 9, vi.

9; 74 L.T. 702), 9, iii. Smith v. Hammond (L.R. [1896] 1 Watkins, in re (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. Q.B. 571; 74 L.T. 590), 20, vii.

336 ; 74 L.T. 505), 17, i. Smith and Sons v. Wilson (75 L.T. ¡ Watkins v. Watkins (L.R. (1896] P. 81), 5, v.

222 ; 74 L.T. 636), 14, ii.

10

Weeding, re; Armstrong v. Weedling

(L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 364; 74 L.T.

651), 31, iv. West Ham Union (Assessment Committee of) v. London County Council and Others (75 L.T. 1),

26, v. Western v. Bailey (L.R. (1896] 2 |

Q:B. 234), 8, vi. White and Smith's Contracts and

the Vendor and Purchaser Act, 1874, re (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 637;

74 L.T. 377), 33, viii. White v. Vestry and Parish of

Fulham (74 L.T. 425), 18, iii. Whiteley v. Edwards (L.R. [1896] 2

Q.B. 48; 74 L.T. 720), 17, vii. Whittaker v. Scarborough Post News

paper Co. (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 148;

74 L.T. 553), 22, iii. Whitwham v. Westminster Brymbo

Coal and Coke Co. (L.R. [1896] 1 1

Ch. 894 ; 74 L.T. 405 and 804),

32, vi. Willesden Local Board v. Wright

(75 L.T. 13), 16, iv. Williams v. Williams and Pocock

(L.R. (1896) P. 153), 11, vi. Willson and Another v. Love and

Others (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. 626;

74 L.T. 580), 15, iv. Wilmot v. Alton (L.R. (1896) 2 Q.B.

254; 74 L.T. 813), 4, i. Winstanley, the (74 L.T. 432 and

75 L.T. 133), 29, vi. Wood, re; Attorney - General v.

Anderson (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 596; 75 L.T. 28), 12, ii.

Young v. South AFRICAN AND

AUSTRALIAN EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYNDICATE (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 268; 74 L.T. 527), 7, iv.

[ocr errors]

Administration:(i.) C. D.- Breach of Covenant to Pay Money-Indemnity-Right of

Administrator to Retain.-A life tenant and a remainderman joined in a mortgage to secure an advance to the former who covenanted to pay all moneys falling due under the mortgage, and to keep the remainderman indemnified. The life tenant died without having paid off any part of the principal. The remainderman took out administration, and was held entitled to retain in respect of the life tenant's breach of covenant.--In re Allen; ddcock v. Evans, L.R. (1896]2 Ch. 345 ;

75 L.T. 136. (ii.) C. D.-Deposit by Testator as Security for Sons-Legacy to Sons

Bankruptcy of Sons-Appropriation of Deposit-Claims on Sons' Interest under Will.--A testator deposited with a bank a sum of money as security for an advance to his sons, and by his will he made a bequest to each son. The sons became bankrupt, indebted to the bank a sum much in excess of the deposit. Held, that the trustees of the will were not entitled to retain the sons' interest under it, to recoup the testator's estate the loss of the deposit with the bank.-Lee v. Binns ; in re Binns,

L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 584; 75 L.T. 99. (iii.) C. D.-dssets-Mortgage-Equitable Charge by Sole Executor and

Legatee-Unsatisfied Creditors-Priorities.- If an executor who is also residuary legatee parts by sale or mortgage for valuable consideration with the control of the testator's assets to a person who has no notice of any ground which rendered it improper for the executor so to deal with them, and who, if his title is equitable only, has given the proper notice, this person's purchase or mortgage is valid against any unsatisfied creditor of the testator.-Graham y. Drummond,

L.R. [1896] 1 Ch. 968; 74 L.T. 417. (iv.) P. D.-Intestates Estates Act, 1890, s. 1- Court of Probate Act, 1857,

8. 73- Grant to Executor of Widow who had not taken Administration.The Court, under sect. 73 of the Probate Act, 1857, granted administration to the executor of a widow who died without having administered to her husband's estate, which was of the net value of less than £500.

- In the goods of Bryant, L.R. (1896] P. 159. (v) P. D.-Intestacy of Married Woman-Husband a Bankrupt--Estate

under £30–Grant to Official Receiver-Citation and Sureties dispensed with-Bankruptcy Act, 1883, 8. 121. (In the goods of Jane Turner, deceased, see 12 P.D. 18, followed.)—Where the husband of a deceased intestate was an undischarged bankrupt, the Court made a grant of her personal estate to the official receiver, and on account of the smallness of the estate dispensed with citation of the husband and accepted the administrator's personal bond. In the goods of Sarah

Jane Conolly, 74 L.T. 461. (vi.) C. A.-Statute Barred Debt Due to Administrator-Right of Retainer

Payment out of Court (laimed. - In the presence of the administrator of the estate of a deceased insolvent who had been liable to the administrator for a debt now statute barred, an order was made carrying over a fund of the deceased to a separate account and directing enquiry for persons beneficially interested. On the death of tho administrator his personal representative took out letters of administration de bonis non to the insolvent estate and claimed to have the fund paid out to her. The Court refused to comply, as the object of

« PreviousContinue »