Page images
PDF
EPUB

the price tende Ms. Ky of the

though for long past firmly established in the Attorney-General personally, has been the subject of conflicting decision as to its extension to the Solicitor-General and ordinary counsel when representing the Crown—though there is little doubt but that at the present day the Solicitor-General has an equal claim to it, yet the tendency of judicial decisions is to narrow it as much as possible. Mr. Kyshe notices that in 1891 it was decided in the Supreme Court of the Straits Settlements that the privilege extends to the Attorney-General of a Crown Colony, though not to the Attorney-General of a County Palatine, the reason doubtless being that the latter does not represent the Crown but the county.

Among other periodicals we notice : The Chicago Legal News; 7 he Law Book News, of St. Paul, Minn. ; The National Corporation Reporter, of Chicago; The Canadian Law Times; The Western Law Times, of Canada ; The Madras Law Journal ; The Law Times, London ; The Law Journal, London; Bulletin Mensuel de la Société de Législation Comparée ; Annuaire de Législation Française ; Annuaire de Législation Etrangère, Paris; La Revue Générale ; Revue Bibliographique Belge; Case and Comment, Rochester, N.Y.; American Law Review ; University Law Review; Canadı Law Journal : Journal du Droit International Priva et de la Jurisprudence Comparée, Nos. I.-VI. (Paris, 1897).

Quarterly Digest
ALL REPORTED CASES,

IN THE

Law Times and Law Reports FOR END OF MAY AND

FOR JUNE, JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER.
By Thomas J. Barnes, of the Middle Teniple,

Barrister-at-Law.

INDEX.

Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case, with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.

iv.

AARON'S REEFs v. TWISS (L.R. (1896) | Bain V. BAIN ; re Smith (75 L.T. 46), A.C. 273; 74 L.T. 794), 6, iv.

21, iii. Adcock v. Evans; in re Allen (L.R. | Ballantyne & Co. v. Mackinnon (75

[1896] 2 Ch. 345; 75 L.T. 136), 1, i. L.T. 95), 28, v. Alcoy and Gandia Railway and Bangor Castle, the (74 L.T. 768), 29,

Harbour Company Limited v.

Greenhill (74 L.T. 345), 22, vii. Barr, re; e. p. Wolfe (L.R. [1896] 1 Allcard v. Walker ; re Lucas Q.B. 616; 74 L.T. 555), 3, iv.

Walker v. Lupton (L.R. [1896] Bassano v. Bradley (L.R. (1896] 1 2 Ch. 369 ; 74 L.T. 487), 14, iii.

Q.B. 645; 74 L.T. 553), 9, ii. Alty v. Farrell (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. Bates v. Donaldson (L.R. (1896] 2 636; 74 L.T. 492), 16, vi.

Q.B. 241; 74 L.T. 751), 15, iii. Armstrong v. Weeding; in re Weeding Battison v. Hobson (L.R. [1896] 2

(L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 364; 74 L.T. Ch. 403; 74 L.T. 680), 19, i. 651), 34, iv.

Baylis, re' (L.R. (1896) 2 Ch. 107; Atkinson v. Carlisle (Mayor of) (L.R. 74 L.T. 337 and 506), 30, vi. [1896] 1 Q.B. 393), 9, i.

Biggerstaff v. Rowatt's Wharf, Ltd. Attorney-General v. Anderson; re (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 93; 74 L.T. Wood (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 596; 75 473), 7, vii. L.T. 28), 12, ii.

Binns, re; Lee v. Binns (L.R. (1896] Attorney-General v. Governors of | 2 Ch. 584 ; 75 L.T. 90), 1, ii.

Christ's Hospital (L.R. (1896] Borrow v. Howland (74 L.T. 787), 1 Ch. 879), 4, vi. .

24, vi. Attorney-General v. Wolverton, Lord “Bovril," re, Trade Mark (74 L.T. (75 L.T. 71), 31, iii.

805), 32, i.

Bradford v. Mayor, &c., of East. | Cook v. Hainsworth (L.R. (1896)

bourne (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 205; | 2 Q.B. 85 ; 75 L.T. 51), 4, iii. 74 L.T. 763), 16, v.

Cook's Mortgage, re; Lawledge v. Brandreth v. Colvin ; in re Pitcairn Tyndall (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 923), (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 199), 35, ii.

14, vi. " Brewer's Settlement, in re; Morton Cooper v. Pearse (L.R. [1896] 1 Q.B.

v. Blackmore (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 562 ; 74 L.T. 495), 15, v. 503; 75 L.T. 177), 28, ii.

Copernicus, the (L.R. [1896] P. 154 Broom v. Phillips (74 L.T. 459), 33, and 237; 74 L.T. 431 and 757),

29, v. Bryant (in the goods of) (L.R. (1896] Cotton v. Vogan & Co. (74 L.T. 598), Ď. 159), 1, iv.

8, vii. Bulkeley v. Stephens (L.R. [1896] Craig v. Craig and Hamp (L.R. 2 Ch. 241 ; 74 L.T. 409), 2, v.

[1896] P. 171), 11, iv. Buller v. Giberne; re Buller (74 L.T. Craig v. Midland Coal and Iron Co. 407), 34, vi.

(74 L.T. 744), 6, vii. Burgess v. Morton (L.R. [1896] A.C. Creagh v. Creagh (74 L.T. 430), 28, i. 136), 22, vi.

Crichton v. Crichton (L.R. [1896] Burnett v. Berry (L.R. [1896] 1 Q.B. | 1 Ch. 870; 74 L.T. 357), 32, vii. 641; 74 L.T. 494), 19, iii.

DAVIDSON v. MYRTLE ; re Smith (L.R. CAIN V. Moon (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. [1896] 2 Ch. 590; 74 L.T. 810), 283; 74 L.T. 728), 11, ix.

33, i. Carew v. Carew ; re Carew (L.R. De Hoghton v. De Hoghton; in re

[1896] 2 Ch. 311; 74 L.T. 501), De Hoghton (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 385; 34, v.

74 L.T. 613), 27, iv. Carter and Others v. Rigby & Co. Derby (County Council of) v. Urban

(L.R. [18967 2 Q.B. 113; 74 L.T. District Council of Matlock, Bath, 744), 9, iv.

and Scarthin Nick (L.R. (1896] Chaddock v. British South Africa A.C. 315; 74 L.T. 595), 13, v.

Co. (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 153; Derbyshire (County Council of) and 74 L.T. 755), 21, viii.

Mayor, &c., of Derby, re (L.R. Chadwick v. Manning (L.R. (1896) (1896] 2 Q.B. 53; 74 L.T. 747), A.C. 231), 8, iii.

22, ii. Charriere,'re; Duret v. Charriere Derbyshire (County Council of) and (L.R. [1896] 1 Ch. 912; 74 L.T. Mayor, &c., of Derby, re (L.R.

[1896] 2 Q.B. 297), 23, v. Clarke's Desigu, re; Clarke v. Sax D'Errico v. Samuel (75 L.T. 59), 21, iv.

and Co., Ltd. (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. Dewhurst and Sons, Ltd., in re Trade 38 ; 74 L.T. 631), 10, viii.

Mark of (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 137; Clegg, Parkinson & Co. v. Earby 74 L.T. 388), 32, ii. Gas Co. (L.R. [1896 1 Q.B. 592), Dibbins v. Dibbins, L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 13, iii.

348; 75 L.T. 137), 8, v. Clifford v. Commissioners of Inland Dickens v. Gill (L.R. (1896 2 Q.B.

Revenue (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 187 ; 310; 75 L.T. 32), 26, ii. 74 L.T. 699), 26, v.

Dixon v. Great Western Railway Clydesdale Bank, Ltd. v. Paton and (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 333), 25, iv.

Another (74 L.T. 738), 13, iv. Douglas v. Douglas (74 L.T. 384), Commissioners of Police v. Cartman 11, viii.

(L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. 655 ; 74 L.T. Drury v. Army and Navy Auxiliary 726), 16, i.

Stores (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. 271; Commissioner for Railways v. 74 L.T.'621), 18, i.

O'Rourke (75 L.T. 84), 5, vi. Duret v. Charriere ; in re Charriere Conolly (Sarah Jane, in the goods of) (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 912; 74 L.T. (74 L.T. 461), 1, v.

650), 11, x. Conquest v. Ebbetts (75 L.T. 36), Dyson and Fowke's Contract (74L.T. 15, vii.

759), 33, vii. Cook v. Culverhouse; in re Culver.

house (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 251 ; EARNSHAW v. EARNSHAW (L.R. [1896] 74 L.T. 347), 12, iii.

P. 160; 74 L.T. 560), 14, i.

650), 11, x..

23, iii..

9

Edwards v. Walters (L.R. [1896] | Harkness and Allsopp's Contract, re 2 Ch. 157 ; 74 L.T. 396), 19, v.

(L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 358; 74 L.T. Ehrmann v. Ehrmann (75 L.T. 37), 652), 34, ii. 21, ii.

Harling v. Harling (74 L.T. 559), Elliot, re; Kelly v. Elliot (L.R.

[1836] 2 Ch. 353; 75 L.T. (38), Hart v. Stone (L.R. [1896] 1 Ch. 754), 35, iii.

(55, ii., ante). Ellis v. Ellis (L.R. (1896] P. 251), Hassell v. Stanley (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 14, iv.

607; 74 L.T. 375), 22, ix. Emerald, the ; the Greta Holme (L.R. Heard v. Heard (L.R. [1996] P. 188),

[1896] P. 192; 74 L.T. 645), 28, iii. 13, vi. Escritt v. Todmorden Co-operative Hellard v. Bewes, in re (L.R. (1896)

Society (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. 461 ; | 2 Ch. 229; 74 L.T. 457), 22, xi. 74 L.T. 350), 14, v.

Heinp, Yarn and Cordage Co., in re; European Blair Camera Co.'s Trade Hindley's Case (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. Mark, re (75 L.T. 63), 31, v.

121; 74 L.T. 627), 7, ii.

Hiddle v. National Fire Insurance FABER V. MONTAGUE (L.R. [1896]

Co. of New Zealand (L.R. (1896) 1 Ch. 549; 74 L.T. 346), 33, iii.

A.C. 372), 23, vi. Fooks v. Horner; re Horner (L.R.

Higginshaw Mills and Spinning Co., [1896] 2 Ch. 188; 74 L.T. 686),

Ltd., re (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 544; 35, i.

75 L.T. 5), 6, ii. Foster v. Fyfe and Another (L.R. 1

Hill, deceased (Trustees of the pro(1896] 2 Q.B. 104; 74 L.T. 784),

perty of Lord) v. Rowlands (L.R.

1896) 2 Q.B.'124; 74 L.T. 556), 18, v. Frewen v. Law Life Assurance Co.

3, iii.

| Hill v. Pilcher (L.R. (1896) 1 Ch. (L.R. [1896]2 Ch. 511; 75 L.T. 17), 27, v.

962 ; 74 L.T. 460), 27, ii. Hill's Waterfall Estate and Gold

Mining Co., Ltd., re (L.R. (1896) GASKELL V. GOSLING (L.R. (18967

| 1 Ch. 947; 74 L.T. 341), 5, vii. 1 Q.B. 669; 74 L.T. 674), 24, i.

Hindson v. Ashby (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. Germaine v. The London Exhibi- !

1; 74 L.T. 327), 26, i. tions, Limited (75 L.T. 101), 19, vi.

Hodson v. Heuland (L.R. (1896] 2 Gillespie Bros. & Co. v. Cheney! Ch. 428: 74 L.T. 811), 15, vi. Eggar & Co. (L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B.59),!

Hood-Barrs v. Heriot' (L.R. (1896] 8, iv.

A.C. 174; 74 L.T. 353), 17, vi. Graham v. Drummond (L.R. (1896] 1

Hood-Barrs v. Heriot (L.R. (1896) 1 Ch. 968; 74 L.T. 417), 1, iii.

1 Q.B. 610 ; 74 L.T. 372), 22, Grainger & Son v. Gough (L.R.

viii. [1896] A.C. 325; 74 L.T. 435),

Hood-Barrs v. Heriot; e. p. Blyth 26, viii.

(L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 338; 75 L.T. Griffin's Divorce Bill (L.R. (1896)

15), 21, v. A.C. 133), 11, v.

Hornsey District Council v. Smith

(L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 254; 74 L.T. Haigh v. LONDON AND NORTH WESTERN 415), 19, iv.

RAILWAY AND GREAT WESTERN How v. Earl Winterton (75 L.T. 40),
RAILWAY, re, AN ARBITRATION 32, viii.
BETWEEN (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. 649 ; | Howard v. Rowatt's Wharf, Ltd.
74 L.T. 655), 3, i.

(L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 93; 74 L.T. Hammersmith (Vestry of) v. Lowen 473), 7, vii.

feld (L.R. [1896] . 2 Q.B. 278; Huber (in the goods of) (L.R. (1896] 75 L.T. 182), 18, ii.

P. 209), 2, i. Hannans Empress Gold Mining Hunt v. Worsfold (L.R. (1896] 2

and Development Co., Ltd.; e. p. Ch. 224; 74 L.T. 456), 23, i. Carmichael (74 L.T. 550 and Hyderabad (Deccan) Co., Ltd., re 75 L.T. 45), 8, ii.

(75 L.T. 23), 6, i. Hardy v. Farmer; in re Hardy |

(L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 904 ; 74 LT. | ISAACS v. CHINNERY (74 L.T. 320), 403), 3, vi.

17, ii.

[ocr errors]

JACKSON v. RAINFORD COAL COMPANY | Lloyd and North London Railway (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 340), 6, vi.

(City Branch) Act, 1861 (L.R. Johnson v. Voight and Co. (75 L.T. | [18967 2 Ch. 397; 74 L.T. 548), 57), 5, iii.

8, viii. Johnstone v. Haviland (L.R. (1896] Lloyd's Bank, Ltd. v. Bullock (L.R. A.C. 95), 27, i.

[1896] 2 Ch. 192; 74 L.T. 687), Jones v. Jones (L.R. [1896] P. 165; 18, vii. 75 L.T. 190), 11, ii.

Lock v. Queensland Investment and Jones v. Withers (74 L.T. 572), 16, ii. Land Mortgage Company, Ltd.

(75 L.T. 3), 6, iii. KEUP v. LESTER (L.R. 1896] 2 Q.B. | London County Council v. Church162), 23, viii.

wardens, &c., of Lambeth (L.R. Kemp v. Rozey ; re Sharland, No. 2 [1896] 2 Q.B. 25 ; 74 L.T. 605), (74 L.T. 664), 34, vii.

20, iv. Kennedy v. De Trafford (L.R. (1896] Lyons and Sons v. Wilkins (L.R. 1 Ch. 762 ; 74 L.T. 599), 18, vị.

(1896] 1 Ch. 811; 74 L.T. 358), Killick v. Graham; Linton v. 32, v.

Burchell (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. 196 ; 75 L.T. 29), 26, iv.

MACDUFF v. MACDUFF; in re MACDUFF Kingston Cotton Mills Co., No. 2, (L.R. (1896]2 Ch. 451; 74 L.T. 706),

in re; e. p. Pickering and Pease 4, vii. good (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 279; 74 Malcolm v. Burford Hancock; in re L.T. 568), 7, iii.

Hancock (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 173; Kirby v. North British and Mercan 74 L.T. 658) (80, ii., ante), 20, vi.

tile Insurance Co. (L.R. [1896] | Manchester and County Bank v.

2 Q.B. 99 ; 74 L.T. 723), 17, viii. Higginshaw Mills and Spinning Kirkwood v. Smith (L.R. [1896] Co. Ltd. (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 544; 1 Q.B. 582 ; 74 L.T. 423), 24, v.

75 L.T. 5), 6, ii. Kissam v. Link (L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. Mansion House Association on Rail. 574; 74 L.T. 368), 22, v.

way Traffic v. London and NorthKnight v. Simmons (L.R. (1896] Western Railway (L.R. (1896) 2 Ch. 294 ; 74 L.T. 563), 10, i.

1 Q.B. 273 ; 74 L.T. 463), 25, ii. König and Ebhardt's Application, re Maréchal Suchet, the (L.R. (1896] (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 236), 32, iv.

P. 233; 74 L.T. 789), 29, iii.

Mariposa, the (75 L.T. 54), 29, i. LA COMPAGNIE DE MAYVILLE v. Marsh v. Joseph (74 L.T. 412), 30, v.

WAITLEY (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 788; Matheson & Co. v. Ludwig ; re 74 L.T. 441), 7, viii.

Doetsch (75 L.T. 69), 20, i. Land Securities Co., in re; e. p. McKeown v. Boudard Peveril Gear

Farquhar (L.R. [1896] 2 Ch. 320; Co., Ltd. (74 L.T. 712) (74, vi., 74 L.T. 400), 8, i.

ante), 6, viii. Lane v. Lane (74 L.T. 557), 13, vii. Middlesex (County Council of) v. Lawledge v. Tyndale, re Cook's St. George's Union (Assessment

Mortgage (L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 923; Committee of) (L.R. [1896] 2 Q.B. 74 L.T. 652), 14, vi.

143; 75 L.T. 153), 25, vi. Lawrence, re (L.R. (1896] P. 244), Moran v. Place (L.R. [1896] P. 214; 12, i.

74 L.T. 661) (79, i., ante), 17, v. Le Brasseur and Oakley, in re; e. p. Morton v. Blackmore ; in re Brewer's

Terrell (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 487; Settlement (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 503 ; 74 L.T. 526 and 717), 30, iv.

75 L.T. 177), 28, ii. Lee v. Binns; re Binns (L.R. (1896] | Mount Cashel v. More-Smyth (L.R. 2 Ch. 584 ; 75 L.T. 99), 1, ii.

[1896] A.C. 158; 74 L.T. 321), Lees' Settlement Trusts, in re (L.R. 12, iv.

[1896] 2 Ch. 508; 75 L.T. 178), 33, iv.

NEW ORMONDE CYCLE Co., LTD., re Lintern v. Burchell (L.R. (18967 (L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 520; 75 L.T. 2 Q.B. 196 ; 75 L.T. 29), 26, iv.

50), 31, vi. Little v. Stevenson & Co. (L.R. | New South Wales (Attorney-General

[1896] A.C. 108; 74 L.T. 529), 1 for) v. Rennie (L.R. (1896] A.C. 29, vii.

376 ; 74 L.T. 532), 5, ii.

« PreviousContinue »