Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CASES REPORTED

IN THE

FIRST EIGHTEEN VOLUMES WHICH HAVE BEEN ACTED

UPON BY APPELLATE COURTS.

PAGE

[blocks in formation]

PAGE

Danenbaum v. Mandelbaum, XVI, 502,
Affirmed, Jan. 22, 1884. No opinion.
Derby v. Hulburt, XVI, 446, Affirmed,
March 11, 1884. No opinion.
Disher v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co.,
XII, 277, Reversed.
.XVIII, 103
Dodge v. Thompson, XIII, 104, Affirm-
ed.
Dunham v. Cudlipp, XIII, 464, Revers-
ed....
Furlong v. Gair, XI, 248, Affirmed, Nov.
27, 1883. No opinion.

.......

. XVIII, 284

.XVIII, 176

[blocks in formation]

Bowen v. Mandeville, XVI, 352, Affirm-
ed
XVIII, 452
Bradner v. Faulkner, XVI, 240, Rever-
sed...
Brisbane v. The D., L. & W. RR. Co.,
XIII, 184, Affirmed..
Byrne v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co.,
XV, 518, Reversed.....
Cain v. The City of Syracuse, XVI, 242,
Affirmed......

Gilbert v. Comstock, XIII, 166, Reversed

XVIII, 101

.XVIII, 419

XVIII, 134

.XVIII, 159

.XVIII, 75 .XVIII, 521

Callahan v. Bancroft, XVI, 367, Affirmed,
March 4, 1884. No opinion.
Carroll v. Deimel, XIII, 401, Reversed,

.XVIII, 549

versed.....

Clark v. Mackin, XVIII, 250, Modified,
March 21, 1884.
Clark v. The L. S. & M. S. RR. Co.,
XIV, 177, Affirmed....... .XVIII, 173
Coleman v. The Manhattan Beach Imp.
Co., XIV, 323, Affirmed......XVIII, 241
Cook v. Lowry, XVI, 408, Modified,

.XVIII, 508

Grandin v. Hernandez, XVII, 88, Affirmed, Feb. 5, 1884. No opinion. Gray v. The Supervisors of Tompkins Co., XIV., 152, Affirmed......XVIII, 100 Guilleaume v. Rowe, XIV, 196, Affirmed, .XVIII, 196 Hall v. The U. S. Reflector Co., XVIII, 7, Appeal dismissed, Feb. 8, 1884. No opinion.

Hallenbeck v. Donnell, XVII, 10, Re

XVIII, 365

...XVIII, 76

Hancock v. Rand, XIII, 208, Affirmed,

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Affirmed, March 21, 1884. In re accounting of Hughes, Reversed......

XVI, 268,

..XVIII, 453 In re accounting of Jackson, XVI, 345, Affirmed...... .XVIII, 433 In re application of Clement, XVII, 431, Affirmed, March 4, 1884. No opinion. In re application of Cooper, XVI, 291, Appeal dismissed....... .XVIII, 28 In re application of The Cortland & Homer RR. Co., XVIII, 163, Affirmed, March 21, 1881. No opinion. In re Macauley, XV, 519, Affirmed, .XVIII, 445

In re The Columbia Ins. Co., XVII, 406, Affirmed December 4, 1883. No opinion.

In re The N. Y., W. S. & B. RR. Co. v.
Townsend, XVII, 469, Affirmed, Dec.
11, 1883. No opinion.

In re The N. Y., W. S. & B. RR. Co., v.
Walsh, XVII, 360, Affirmed...XVIII, 349
In re The Security Life Ins. & Ann. Co.,
XVIII, 154, Affirmed, March 4, 1884.
No opinion.

In re will of Cottrell, XVIII, 167, Affirm-
ed, March 21, 1884.

[blocks in formation]

In re will of Gouraud, XVI, 265, Re-
versed......
XVIII, 516
Isaacson v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR.
Co., XIII, 239, Reversed.. ...XVIII, 282
Kenyon v. See, XVI, 575, Affirmed,

117, Reversed,......

....XVIII, 422 Knapp v. Roche, X, 187, Reversed,

..XVIII, 324 Langdon v. The Mayor, &c., of N. Y., XVI,, 289, Affirmed.. ...XVIII, 37 Laytin v. Davidson, XVII, 18, Affirmed, XVIII, 564 Leavitt v. Wolcott, XVII, 74, Reversed,

..XVIII, 500

Loomis v. White, XVI, 407, Affirmed, Feb. 26, 1884. No opinion.

Luffman v. Hoy, XIII, 324, Affirmed, Nov. 20, 1883. No opinion.

.XVIII, 102

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

TABLE OF CASES AFFIRMED, &c.

xiii

The People v. McKeon, XVI, 347, Affirmed, Jan. 22, 1834. No opinion. The People v. Smith, XVI, 238, Affirmed, Jan. 22, 1884. No opinion.

PAGE

[blocks in formation]

Yonkers Gaslight Co., XIV, 95, Affirmed, Dec. 4 1883. No opinion. Thorne v. Turck, XIII, 550, Affirmed,

PAGE

.XVIII, 200

Todd v. Weber, XVII, 72, Affirmed,

XVIII, 496 Tozer v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co., XVII, 370, Affirmed, Feb. 5, 1884. No opinion.

Vick v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co.,
XVII, 316, Reversed.
.XVIII, 505
Vosburgh v. The L. S. & M. S. RR. Co.,
XIV, 514, Affirmed........... .XVIII, 300
Waldele v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR,

Co., XVI, 186, Reversed... . XVIII, 542 Weed v. Root, XIV, 90, Affirmed, XVIII, 316 Whitford v. Laidler. XIII, 139, Revers

[ocr errors][merged small]

3

ed... Whitney v. Lebenheim, XIV, 415, Affirmed, Jan. 29, 1884. No opinion. Wilder v. Ranney, XVI, 478, Affirmed, .XVIII, 400 Woodruff v. The Erie R. Co., XIII, 162, Reversed.. Wooster v. Kisch, XIII, 497, Affirmed, Nov. 27, 1883. No opinion. Younger v. Duffie, XVI, 35, Affirmed,

XVIII, 197

XVIII, 366

The People ex rel. Smith v. The Trustees
of Flushing, XVIII, 19), Affirmed,
March 4, 1884. No opinion.
The Rector, &c., of Christ Church v.
Mack, XIII, 397, Reversed....XVIII,
The Second Natl. Bk. v. Burt, XIV, 290,
Reversed....
XVIII, 56
The Union Dime Savgs. Inst. v. Wilmot,
XIV, 5, Reversed...... .XVIII, 193
The Westchester Gaslight Co. v. The

THE

NEW YORK WEEKLY

DIGEST.

VOLUME XVIII.

BAR.

N. Y. COURT OF APPEALS.

Candee, respt., v. Smith, exrx., applt.

Decided Oct. 2, 1883.

Prior to the passage of 1278 of the Code a judgment by confession against one joint debtor was a bar to an action against the others.

On October 4, 1874, plaintiff, who was payee and holder of a joint promissory note, took judgment thereon by confession against C., one of the makers. Upon an execution issued thereon he collected a portion by a sale of C.'s property. In July, 1877, plaintiff brought this action against all the makers to recover the balance of said note remaining unpaid. S., defendant's testator, alone appeared. He set up that he was a mere surety for the defendant C. and was discharged from liability by the

Vol. 18.-No. 1.

judgment against C. and the subsequent proceedings of plaintiff thereunder. Upon the trial plaintiff proved his note and rested. Defendant then moved to dismiss the complaint, which motion was denied. The court found that plaintiff was entitled to recover. Adelbert Moot, for applt. J. M. Humphrey, for respt.

Held, That plaintiff having elected to prosecute one of the joint makers of the note and proceeded to judgment against him, the note as to all the parties became thereupon merged in the judgment and no right of action survived to the holder as against any of the joint makers omitted by him in the original prosecution.

This action was tried before the enactment of $1278 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was enacted in 1880 and provides that a judgment by confession against one joint debtor should

« PreviousContinue »