ambiguous or doubtful, parol evidence to

contradict or explain it is inadmissible.--Id.
44. The codicil in question had the usual at-

testation clause. Both witnesses testified
that they did not see testatrix sign it and
that she did not acknowledge it; one stat-
ing that testatrix told her that she had a
paper she wanted her to sign and that
she did not know it was a will. Held,
Thal a sufficient compliance with the re-
quirements of the statute was not shown
10 warrant probate of the codicil. — Wool-

ley v. Woolley et al , 573.
See Bar, 7 ; BENEVOLENT SOCIETIES ; Dow-

ER, 1, 5; EVIDENCE, 29 ; EXECUTORS, &c.,
16 ; TRUSTS, 3.