Page images
PDF
EPUB

W. Dig.

.XV., 538 ..XVI., 515

Title of Case,

Reported in Fuli. People ex rel. The Supervisors of Ulster Co. v. Hardenburg..

90 N. Y., 411. People ex rel. The 230 St, RR. Co. v. Com’rs of Taxes. 91 N. Y., 593. People ex rel. The Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Davenport et al...

91 N. Y., 574.... People ex rel. Townsend et al. v. Porter et al.

90 N. Y., 68. People ex rel. Trainor v. Baker..

89 N. Y., 460. People ex rel. Van Aken v. Milham et al.

29 Hun, 151. People ex rel. White v. Lonmis..

27 Hun, 328. Phelps et al. v. Borland...

30 Hun, 362. Phelps et al. v. Borland...

30 Hun, 366.. Phillips et al. v. Davies et al.

92 N. Y., 199. Phillips v. Mackellar...

92 N. Y., 34. Phenix Bank v. Stafford et al.

89 N. Y., 405. Piper et al. v. Van Buren..

27 Hun, 384. Piser v. Lockwood.....

30 Hun, 6 Platz v. The City of Cohoes.

89 N. Y., 219. Plimpton et al. v. Bigelow.

29 Hun, 362.. Pomeroy et al. v. Moss et al.

27 Hun, 242 Pope v. Allen..

90 N. Y., 298. Popham v. The 230 St. RR. Co. et al

16 J. & S., 229. Porter Mfg. Co. v. Edwards.

29 Hun, 509.. Post et al. v. Mason et al..

91 N. Y., 539 Poughkeepsie Gas Co. v. The Citizens' Gas Co. 89 N. Y., 493. Powell v. Waldron..

89 N. Y., 328. Pratt v. Underwood..

4 Civ. Pro., 167.. Pray et al. v. Hegeman et al.

92 N. Y., 508. Prest., &c., of the D. & H. C. Co. v. The Village of Whitehall et al.....

90 N. Y., 21. Prichard et al. v. Thompson et al.

29 Hun, 295.. Pringle v. Woolworth .

90 N. Y., 502.
Prospect Park & C. I. RR. Co. v. Williamson et al.... 91 N. Y., 552.
Providence & Stonington SS. Co. v. The Phænix Ins.
Co. et al...

89 N. Y., 559. Purd; et al. v. Hayt et al.

92 N. Y., 446. Putnam v. Stewart .....

2 Civ. Pro., 172.

.XVI., 468
.XV., 459
.XV., 194
XVI., 163

XV., 152
XVII., 553
XVII., 556
.XVII., 3
XVI., 509

XV., 169 .XV., 213 XVII., 313

.XV., 61 XVII., 73

XV., 25 XV.. 414 XIV., 269 XVII., 324 .XVI., 439

XV., 298 .XIV., 545 XVII., 264 .XVII., 57

..XV., 244 XVI., 419 XVI., 17 .XVI., 398

.XV., 300 XVII., 220 XIV., 495

Q

Quick v. Nixon
Quinn v. Power...

27 Hun, 592.
29 Hun, 183.

XV., 228 XVI., 158

R

Ramsden v. Ramsden..
Ramsden v, Ramsden..
Raux v. Brand..
Rawle v. Phelps.
Raynor v. Laux...
Reck v. The Phænix Ins. Co
Reed v. McCrum ....
Reed et al. v. T'he Lancaster Fire Ins. Co..
Rehberg v. The Mayor, &c., of N. Y..
Reilly v. The Mayor, &c., of N. Y..
Revere Copper Co. v. Dimock..
Revere Copper Co. v. Dimock..
Rice v. Childs..
Robbins v. Robbins
Robert v. Corning et al.
Roberts v. The O. & L. C. RR. Co..
Robertson v Barnum et al.
Robins v. Ackerly.
Robinson v. Brennan..
Roche v. Marvin et al. .
Rocky Mountain Nat'l. Bk. v. Bliss
Rodburn v. The Utica, I. & E. RR. Co...
Rothery et al. v. The N. Y. Rubber Co.

28 Hun, 285.
91 N. Y., 281.
90 N. Y., 309.
2 Flipp, 471.
28 Hun, 35..

3 Civ. Pro., 376.
91 N. Y., 412.
.90 N. Y., 382..
.91 N .Y., 137.
.16 J. & S., 274.
.29 Hun, 299.
.90 N. Y., 33.
.28 Hun, 303..
89 N. Y., 251.
.89 N. Y., 225.
.29 Hun, 154.
29 Hun, 657.
91 N. Y., 98.
.90 N. Y., 208.
..92 N. Y., 398.
.89 N. Y., 338
.28 Hun, 369..
.90 N. Y., 30.

XV., 481
XVI., 175

XV., 534 VIII., 551 .XVI., XVII., 253 XVI., 254 XV., 498 XVI., 178

XV., 271 .XVI., 480

XV., 349 .XVI., 445 XV., 39 .XV., 78 .XVI., 160 .XVII., 91

XVI., 234

XV., 340 XVII., 53 XIV., 553 .XV., 530 .XV., 343 ,16 J. & S., 135.. Sprague et al. v. Richards et al.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

.XV., 37 .XV., 117 .VI., 335 .X., 366

XVI., 394 XVII., 336

.XIV., 66 .XVII., 542

XV., 80 XVI., 88

XV., 97 XVI., 373

..X., 224 .XV., 551 .XVI., 127 .XVII., 548

XV., 376 .XVI., 207 XIV., 87 XVI., 395 .XVI., 180

Sage et al. v. The City of Brooklyn...

.89 N. Y., 189. St. Clair v. Day

89 N. Y., 357. Sanford v. The Town of Portsinouth.

2 Flipp, 105. Saratoga Co. Bk. v. Pruyn..

.90 N. Y., 250 Sawyer v. The People....

1 N. Y. Crim., 249. Schulhoff v. The Co-operative Dress Ass'n

3 Civ. Pro.. 412 Schulte et al. v. Anderson..

16 J. & S., 133 Schultz v. Cookingham et al.

...30 Hun, 443. Schultz v. The Third Ave. RR. Co.

..89 N. Y., 242 Schwab v. Cleveland..

..28 Hun, 458. Scott v. Stebbins et al.

.27 Hun. 335. Scott v. Stebbins et al.

.91 N. Y., 605. Semel v. The N. Y., N. H. & H. RR. Co..

9 Daly, 321. Sexton v. Pepper et al.

.28 Hun, 31 Shaffer v. Holm...

.28 Hun, 264. Shandley v. The City of Brooklyn.

.30 Hun, 396. Sharkey v. Mansfield.

.90 N. Y., 227. Sharp et al. v. Fancher.

.29 Hun, 193. Sharp v. Hutchinson.

.16 J. & S., 101. Sheehan v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co....

.91 N. Y., 332. Sheldon v. Haxtun..

.91 N. Y., 124. Sheldon H. B. Co. v. The Eickemeyer H. & Mach. Co. et al..

..90 N. Y., 607. Sheldon v. Vail.

.28 Hun, 354. Sherill Roper Air Engine Co. v. Harwood.

..30 Hun, 9.. Sherman et al. v. Scott et al..

.27 Hun, 331.. Short v. Medberry.

.29 Hun, 39.. Short v. The Home Ins. Co.

.90 N. Y., 16. Sidenberg v. Ely et al..

.90 N. Y., 257. Siewert v. Hamel et al

.91 N. Y., 199. Smillie v. Quinn..

90 N. Y., 492. Smith v. Burch.

.28 Hun, 331. Smith v. Burch..

92 N. Y., 228. Smith v. Cooper

.27 Hun, 565. Smith v. Cooper.

.30 Hun, 395... Smitli et al. v. Cross et ai.

.90 N. Y., 549. Smith et al. v. Davis

3 Civ. Pro., 74. Smith v. Edwards.

.29 Hun, 493.. Smith v. Mahon...

.27 Hun, 40. Smith v. Meaghan et al.

28 Hun, 423. Smith et al. v. Roberts et al.

..91 N. Y., 470. Smith v. Robertson..

.89 N. Y., 555 Smith et al. v. The City of Rochester

.92 N. Y., 463. Smith v. The N. Y. C. & A. R. RR. Co...

.30 Hun, 144.. Snyder v. Hughes.

.27 Hun, 373. Snyder v. Snyder et al.

.30 Hun, 186. Southern Ex. Co. v. The Nashville, C. & St. L. RR. Co. 2 Flipp 672. Spiess v. Rosswogg et al....

[blocks in formation]

.XV., 363 .XVII., 490 .XVI., 76 XVI., 323 XVII., 333 ..XV., 48 .XVI., 33 .XVI., 481

.XV., 277 XVII., 298 .XVII., 180

.XV., 216 XVII., 395

.30 Hun, 246. Sprague v. Swift..

3 Civ. Pro., 34. Springstein v. Gillett.

...30 Hun, 260. Stamm v. Bostwick..

.30 Hun, 70.. Starke et al. v. The Schooner “ Napoleon”

7 Biss., 393. Stark weather v. Starkweather...

.29 Hun, 488. Steele et al. v. Lord....

..28 Hun, 27.. Steen v. The Niagara Fire Ins. Co.

.89 N. Y., 315. Stephenson et al. v. Short et al.

.27 Hun, 380.. Stephenson et al. v. Short al

92 N. Y., 433. Stewart v. The Brooklyn & C. T. RR. Co... ..90 N. Y., 588. Stoddard et al. v. Gailor et al..

.90 N. Y., 575. Stone v. Woodruff et al. ....

28 Hun, 534 Storrs et al. v. Plumb..

.30 Hun, 319.

X., 210 XIV., 199 XVII., 564

XV., 445 XVII., 403 XVII., 462

.IV., 422 XVI., 519 XVI., 54 .XV., 41

.XV., 215 XVII, 149 XVI., 126 XVI., 40 .XVI., 476 XVII., 529

Title of Case.
Story v. The N. Y. Elevated RR. Co.
Stringham v. Stewart..
Sutherland v. Olcott et al
Swift v. The State..

Reported in Full.
.90 N. Y., 122..
.27 Hun, 562.

29 Hun, 161.
..89 N. Y., 52.

W. Dig. .XV., 564 .XV., 335 XVI., 281 .XIV., 548

T Tabor v. The People...

..90 N. Y., 248.. Tallman v. Hoey..

.89 N. Y., 537 Talmadge v. The Third Natl. Bk.

.91 N. Y., 531. Taylor v. Risley...

28 Hun, 141 Tebo v. Robinson..

.29 Hun, 243. Tenney v. Bergen

.16 J. & S., 11. Thebaud v. Schermerhorn et al.

.30 Hun, 332. Thieme v. Madden et al.,

.27 Hun, 371. Thomas v. The Mayor, &c., of N. Y.

.28 Hun, 110. Thompson et al. v. Strauss..

.29 Hun, 256. Thorp v. Thorp.

.90 N. Y., 602. Tiffany v. Willis..

.30 Hun, 266... Toles v. Adee et al.

.91 N. Y., 562 Tolman v. The Syr., Bing. & N. Y. RR. Co... .27 Hun, 325.. Tolman v. The Syracuse, Bing. & N. Y. RR. Cu. 92 N. Y., 353. Tompkins v. Smith et al

16 J. & S., 113. Toole v. McKiernan...

16 J. & S., 163. Town of Lyons v. Chamberlin et al.,

..89 N. Y., 578. Town of Wheatland et al. v. Taylor et al.

.29 Hun, 70... Train v. Friedman.

4 Civ. Pro.,109. Trimmer v. Hiscock.

.27 Hun, 364. Trustees of Canandargua Academy v. McKechnie et al.90 N. Y., 618. Tunstall v. Winton...

.27 Hun, 264. Turner v. Kouwenhoven.

.29 Hun, 232. Tuthill v. Wilson ..

..90 N. Y., 423.

XV., 320 ..XV., 348 XVI., 487 .XVI., 52 .XVI, 237 .XIV., 70 VII., 524 .XV., 214 .XV., 378 XVI., 503 XVI., 82 XVII., 396 .XVI., 537

XV., 124 XVII., 32 .XIV., 65 .XIV., 220

.XV., 344 XVI., 383 XVII., 572

.XV., 267 .XVI., 156

XV., 221 .XVI., 523 .XVI.,

2

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

XV.,

Wager et al. v. Wager et al.
Wakefield v. Fargo et al..
Wahlfart v. Beckett.
Wahlfahrt v. Beckert.
Waldele v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co....
Wallach et al. v. Sippili..
Wangler v. Swift..
Watson v. The 42 St. & Grand St. Ferry RR. Co.
Webster v. The People..
Weeks et al. v. Cornwell et al.
Weeks et al. v. Little....
Wells v. O'Connor et al.
Welsh et al. v. Gossler et al.
Wendell et al. v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co.
Wetmore v. Porter..
Wheelan v. The Ansonia Clock Co....
Wheeler v. Miller...
Wheelwright et al. v. Rhodes et al..

.89 N. Y., 161...
.90 N. Y., 213.
.27 Hun, 74..
92 N. Y.. 490.
.29 Hun, 35..
.65 How., 501..
.90 N. Y., 38.
.16 J. & S., 44..
.92 N. Y., 422.
.65 How., 413.
..89 N. Y. 566..
.27 Hun, 426..
.89 N. Y., 540.
..91 N. Y.. 420.
.92 N. Y., 76.
.27 Hun, 557.
.90 N. Y., 353
.28 Hun, 57.

67 .XV., 339

XV., 202 XVII., 54 XVI., 186 XVII., 386

.XV., 350 .XIII., 418 .XVII., 197 XVII., 495

XV., 280 .XV., 122 .XV., 347 XVI., 375 .XVI., 546 .XV., 334 XV., 513 .XV., 406

Title of Case.
Whitney et al. v. Coleman..
Wilder v. The Union Natl. Bk.
Willett v. The People..
Williams et al. y. Gillies.
Williams et al. v. Ingersoll et al.
Willis v. Smyth et al..
Wilmerding v. McKesson
Wilson v. Bennett.
Wilson v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co..
Wilson v. The Singer Mfg. Co..
Wiltsie v. Shaw.
Winne et al. v. The Niagara Fire Ins. Co..
Wood et al. v, Mitcham et al...
Woodruff v. The Imperial Fire Ins. Co..
Woodru tf v. The Imperial Fire Ins. Co. et al..
Works v. The City of Lockport...
Wright v. Clapp.
Wright et al. v. Cabot et al.
Wright v. The People..
Wyckoff v. Anthony et al.
Wynkoop v. The Niagara Fire Ins. Co..

Reported in Full. 9 Daly 238.

I Biss., 178. .27 Hun, 469. 28 Hun, 175. .89 N. Y.508. .91 N. Y., 297. .28 Hun, 184.

2 Civ. Pro., 34.
.27 Hun, 149.

9 Biss., 173.
.29 Hun, 195..
.91 N. Y., 185
92 N. Y., 375
27 Hun, 229.
90 N. Y., 521.
.28 Hun., 9.
.28 Hun, 7.
.89 N. Y., 570.

1 N. Y. Crim., 462.
.90 N. Y., 442.
.91 N. Y., 478

W. Dig. X., 167 IX., 220 XV., 411 XV., 533

XV., 500 XVI., 303 XVI., 95 .XIV., 452 .XV.,

IX., 338 XVI., 182 .XVI., 105 .XVII., 95

.XV., 23 XVI., 14 .XV., 383 XV., 424 XV., 357 XVI., 269

XV., 461 .XVI., 298

Y

Youmans v. Edgerton..
Young v. Thurber et al..
Younger v. Duffie.

.91 N. Y., 403., ..91 N. Y., 388. .28 Hun, 242.

XVI., 489
XVI., 442
.XVI., 35

IN D E X.

ACCOUNTING. 1. Plaintiff entrusted B. with certain moneys

to be used in making a joint purchase of the interest of one W. in certain property, the value of which was not known, but B. was to pay for plaintiff's half whatever he paid for bis own, not exceeding the amount entrusted to him. B. did not ac. count, and plaintiff could not ascertain without investigation and inquiry whether B. so applied the whole amount or what the securities bought were. Held, That the facts justified a resort to equity and a decree for an accounting.- Marvin v. Brooks,

199. See ExecUTORS, &c., 12, 13; PARTNERSHIP, 6.

ACTION. See AGENCY; ATTORNEYS, 5; COMMON CAR

RIERS, 4; CONSTABLES, 2; COUNTY; Con. TRACT, 19, 23; FRAUD, 7; INFANTS, 1, 2; INJUNCTION, 4, 6; JUDGMENT, 2; ODD FELLOWS, 2; Practice, 8; REDEMPTION, 1; SERVICES, 2; SHERIFFS, 6, 7; SUBROGATION, 3; TAXATION, 2; TRESPASS, 2; WILLS, 11, 14.

ADMINISTRATORS. See ExecuTORS, &c.; SURROGATE, 1, 4, 10.

his heirs has continued, the term of a valid assessment lease of the premises, creating an outstanding term, must be deducted. The statute of limitations does not run against the owners during the term of such a lease, for the reason that they are not en

titled to possession.— Not v, Carroll, 405. 4. The possession of a tenant is the possession

of the landlord not only during the term but presumably for twenty years thereafter, notwithstanding any claim by the tenant or his successor of a hostile title. To initiate an adverse holding the tenant must surrender possession to the landlord or do something equivalent thereto and bring home to him knowledge of the adverse

claim.– Whiting v. Edmunds et al., 417. See EASEMENT, 2.

AFFIDAVIT.
See ASSIGNMENT FOR CREDITORS, 11; AT-

TACHMENT, 5, 7, 8; DEPOSITIONS, 3; SER-
VICE, 2, 5, 6; SUBMISSION; VENUE, 1, 4.

AGENCY.

ADVERSE POSSESSION. 1. Proof that the owner of lands adjoining a

highway continually cultivated and mowed a portion of such lighway, and used it for piling lumber, is insufficient to establish a title in him to that portion of the highway by adverse possession.Bliss v. Johnson et

al., 246. 2. The permanent occupation of a highway

by inclosure or cultivation is manifestly inconsistent with the right of passage by the traveling public, and no matter how long continued can never ripen into a tiile as against the public, whatever may be its effect as to the owner of the soil of such

highway.-ld. 3. In computing the period during which pos

session of lands adverse to the owner and

1. An agent who obtains goods upon credit

for his principal by means of false representations, knowingly made, as to the financial condition of his principal, is himself liable in an action for fraud. Such action may be brought before the debt of the prin. cipal matures.Phillips et al. v. Wortendyke,

376. See DISCOVERY, 2; FIRE INSURANCE, 6, 7;

LEASE, 4; SURETYSHIP, 1-3; SURROGATE, 2.

AGREEMENT.

See ATTORNEYS, 2 ; BANKRUPTCY ; Con.

TRACT.

ALIMONY
See DIVORCE, 1, 4–10.

AMENDMENT.

See APPEAL, 6; WTTACHMENT, 9; COUNTY

COURT; NEGLIGENCE, 16; PLEADING, 14, 18; REFERENCE, 2.

« PreviousContinue »