Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CASES

IN THE FIRST EIGHTEEN VOLUMES OF THE NEW YORK WEEKLY DIGEST,

WHICH HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN FULL.

N. B.- No reference is made to cases which hare appeared in Memoranda in the Regular Reports.

A

Title of Case.
Adams v. Adams..
Adams v. Roberts..
Ætna Ins. Co. v. Shuler.
Albany City Natl. Bk. v. The City of Albany.
Alford et al. v, Cobb et al..
Alker v. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y.
Anderson v. Schnitzler.
Anderson v. Sibley et al..
Andrews v. The Itna Life Ins. Co..
Andrews v. Townshend...
Armour et al. v. The Transatlantic Fire Ins. Co..
Armstrong et al. v. Du Bois et al.,
Arnold v. Arnold et al.,
Arnold v. Oliver....
Atty. Gen. v. The Continental Life Ins Co....
Atty. Gen. v. The Continental Life Ins. Co...
Auerbach v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co....
Augsbury v. The People....
Avery v. The City of Syracuse.

Reported in Fuil.
91 N. Y., 381.....
.62 How., 253..
.28 llun, 338.
92 N. Y., 363.
.28 Hin, 22.,
.27 Hun, 413.
.16 J. & S., 173..
.28 Hun, 16..
.92 N. Y., 596.
..16 J. & S., 162

.90 N. Y., 450.
..90 N, Y., 95.

.90 N. Y., 580.
..28 Hun, 324.
.27 Hun, 594..
.28 Hun., 360..
.89 N. Y., 281.
1 N. Y. Crim., 299.
.29 Hun, 537..

W. Dig.
XVI., 202
.XII., 462
.XVI., 23
.XVII., 177

XV., 557
.XV., 140
XIV., 263

XV., 382
.XVII., 169
XIV., 213
.XVI., 102

XV., 553 .XVI., 38 .XVI., 280 .XV., 239

XV., 568 XIV., 469 XVI., 378 .XVII., 358

B Babcock v. Emrich et al.

.64 How., 435. Babcock v. Gifford....

..29 IIụn, 186. Baldwin v. Roberts...

.30 Hun, 163 B. &. O. RR. Co. v. Arthur et al..

..90 N. Y., 234. Bank of Attica v. The Metropolitan Natl. Bk.. .91 N. Y., 239. Bank of Brit. N. America v. The Merchant's Nat). Bk.16 J & S., 1. Bank of Brit. N. America v. The Merchant's Natl. Bk.91 N. Y., 106... Bank of Oswego v. Doyle et al. ....

.91 N. Y., 32.. Barclay v. Culver...

.30 llun, 1. Barkley v. The R. & S. RR. Co...

.27 Hun, 515. Barne v. Neuss...

.2 Civ. Pro., 185. Barnes v. Newcomb..

.89 N. Y., 108. Barry v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co..

.92 N. Y., 289 Bate v. McDowell et al.

.16 J. & S., 219. Bates et al. v.Plonsky et al.

..28 Hun, 112.. Bates v. The First Natl. Bk

..89 N. Y., 286 Baucus v. Stover et al..

..89 N. Y., 1. Beach v. Beach...

..29 Hun, 181. Bedell v. Barnes

29 Ilun, 589. Bedford et al. v. Tupper et al

.30 Hun, 174. Bell y. Merrifield..

28 Hun, 219. Bell v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co..

29 Hlun, 560. Bennett et al v. Edwards....

.27 Hun, 352. Vol. 18.-No, 25.

XVI., 421

XVI., 159 XVII., 239

XV., 374 XVI., 80 XIII., 374 .XVI., 111 .XVI., 308 XVII., 295

XV., 314 XIV., 522 ..XIV., 433 XVII., 33 .XIV., 244

.XV., 379 XIV.. 554 XIV., 313

XVI., 169 XVII., 312 XVII., 367

XV., 441 XVII., 79

.XV., 250

[ocr errors]

Title of Case.

Reported in Ful. Bergen v. Powell.

..30 Hun, 438. Bernard v. Morrison.

.29 Hun, 410. Bertles v. Nullan...

.92 N. Y. 152. Bickerton v. Jaques et al.

.28 Hun, 119. Bigelow v. Hall et al..

.91 N. Y., 145 Billings v, Trask et al

.30 Hun, 314. Billings v. Robinson.

. 28 Hun, 122. Bills et al. v. The Natl. Park Bk.

.89 N. Y., 343. Bitter v. Jones et al..

28 Hun, 492. Bliven et al. v. Seymour et al..

.90 N. Y., 469 Bloomer et al. v. McInerny et al.

.30 Hun, 201.. Blumenthal v. Anderson et al..

.28 Ilun, 93.. Blumenthal v. Anderson et al.

.91 N. Y., 171. Board of Comrs. of Excise v. McGrath.

27 Hun, 425.. Board of Suprs. of Monroe Co. v. Clarke

92 N. Y., 391 Bonnell v. Griswold...

.89 N. Y., 122, Boreel v. Lawton..

90 N. Y., 293. Bork v. The People.

91 N. Y., 5. Borthwick v. Howe...

.27 Hun, 505. Bostwick v. Van Voorhis..

91 N. Y. 353. Bowen v. Mapdeville..

.29 Hun, 42.. Bownev. Lynde et al..

.91 N. Y., 92. Brackett v. Harvey.

.91 N. Y., 214 Bradley v. Mirick.

91 N. Y., 293.. Bradner et al. v. Strang et al..

.89 N. Y., 299.. Brainerd v. White et al..

. 16 J. & S., 399.. Brevoort v. The City of Brooklyn...

.89 N. Y., 128. Bridges v. The Board of Suprs. of Sullivan Co. .92 N. Y., 570. Briggs et al. v. The Central Natl. Bank...

.89 N. Y., 182. Bristol et al. v. Sears.

3 Civ. Pro., 328. Bronson v. Munson..

.29 Hun, 54... Brooks v. Harrison.

91 N. Y., 83. Brooks v. The N. Y. & Greenwood Lake RR. Co.... 30 Hun, 47. Brown v. Brown et al....

29 Hun, 498. Brown v. Landon...

.30 Hun, 57. Brown v. The Buff., N. Y. & E. RR. Co.

27 Hun, 342. Buckingham v. Corning.

.91 N. Y., 525.. Budd v. Walker..

.29 Hun, 344. Buell v. The Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co..

2 Flipp., 9... Bulkley v. The Gutta Percha & R. Co..

3 Civ. Pro., 428 Burdick et al. v. Hale.

.13 Abb. N. C., 60. Burleigh et al. v. The Adriatic Fire Ins. Co.

.90 N. Y., 220. Burnett v. Gould...

.:27 Hun, 366 Bushnell v. Carpenter.

28 Hun, 19.. Bushnell v. Carpenter.

.92 N. Y., 270.

.XVII., 507
.XVI., 428
XVI., 573
.XV., 466
XVI., 241
XVII , 532

XV., 521
.XV., 175
.XVI., 229

XV., 8 XVII., 398

XV., 427 .XVI., 78

XV., 132 XVII., 14

XIV., 497 .XV., 429 XVI., 153 .XV., 307 XVI., 379 XVI., 352 XVI., 248 XVI., 257 XVI., 200 XV., 162 XVI., 457

XV., 66 XVII., 221 XIV., 425 XVI., 193 .XVI., 110 .XVI., 124 XVII., 300 XVII., 334 XVII., 460

XV., 147 XVI., 492 XVII., 31

.II., 161 XVII., 141 XVII. , 279 XV., : 25 XV., 186 XV., 559 XVI., 440

С

Cain v. The City of Syracuse.
Callahan v. Bancroft...
Callahan v. Sharp..
Campbell v. Beaumont.
Caring et al. v Richmond.
Carleton v. Darcy et al..
Carncross et al. v. The People.
Carpenter v. Butler....
Carrington v. Hutson.
Carroll et al. v. Lupkins et al.
Carter et al. v. Holahan et al.
Cass v. Higenbotam
Cassel et al. v. Fisk et al.
Catlin et al. v. Moss et al
Chamberlain et al. v, Taylor et al.
Champlain et al. v. Stoddart..
Chapin v. Thompson.
Chase v. Chase..
Chatfield v. Simonson et al.
Childs et al. v, Kendall..

.29 Hun, 105.
.28 Hun, 584
..27 Hun, 85..
.91 N. Y., 464.
28 Hun, 25..
.90 N. Y., 566..
.1 N. Y. Crim., 518.
.29 Hun, 251.
.28 Hun, 371.
29 Hun, 17.
92 N. Y., 498.
.27 Hun., 406

2 Civ. Pro., 91..

2 Civ. Pro., 201..
.92 N. Y., 348.
29 Hun, 615.
89 N. Y., 270..
.29 Hun, 527.
..92 N. Y., 209
...30 Hun, 227...

XVI., 242
XVI., 367
.XV., 204
XVI., 297
XV., 546
XVI., 125
XVII., 383
XVI., 507
XVI., 12
XVI., 19.5
XVII., 171

XV.. 135 XV., 255 XV., 14 XVII., 55 XVII., 76

XV., 159 XVII., 319 XVII., 8 .XVII., 516

Title of Case.

Reported in Full. Chrysler v. Canaday..

.90 N. Y., 272.. Claflin et al. v. Baere et al.

.28 Hun, 204. Clatiin et al. v. Frankel et al.

.29 Hun, 288. Clark v. Davenport...

.30 Hun, 161. Clews et al. v. The Bank of N. Y. Natl. Bkg Assn. 89 N. Y., 418. Clute v. Gould et al..

.28 Hun, 348. Coates v. The First Nau. Bk. of Emporia.

.91 N. Y., 20. Colt v. Owens et al...

.90 N. Y., 368. Comrs. of Charities v. Richmond et al.

28 Hun, 488. Copaughty v. The Saratoga Co. Bk.

28 Hun, 373. Conaughty v. The Saratoga Co. Bk.

.92 N. Y., 401. Conger et al. v. Duryee..

.90 N. Y., 594. Cook v. Lowry..

.29 Hun 20.. Cooke v. Ford et al..

2 Flipp., 22. Cooke et al. v. Ryan.

.29 Hun, 249 Cooke v. The Lalance Grosjean Mfg. Co.

.29 Hun, 641. Cooper et al. v. Jolly...

..30 Hun, 224, Corn Exchange Bk, v. The Nassau Bk.

.91 N. Y.,74. Cox et al. v. Dorwin..

.29 Hun. 293. Crabb v. Young et al..

.92 N. Y., 56 Cribben et al. v. Schillinger.

.30 Hun, 248. Crimmins v. Crimmins..

.64 How., 103. Crocker v. The City of Buffalo..

.90 N. Y. 351. Crooke et al. v. The Flatbush Water Works Co.. .27 Hun, 72. Crosby v. Moses...

16 J. & S., 146. Cross et al. v. Williams, sheriff.

.63 How., 191. Crouse et al. v. Frothingham et al.

.27 Hun, 123. Crowley v. Palen et al.

..65 How., 435.. Cunningham et al. v. Judson.

.30 Hun, 63. Cutter v. Cutter..

. 16 J. & S., 470. Cutter et al. y. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y. ...92 N. Y., 166.

W. Dig. XV., 399 XVI., 47 .XVI., 459 XVII., 184

XV., 196 XVI., 30 XVI., 259

XV., 439 XVI., 48 XV., 526 XVII., 1 XVI., 83 XVI., 408

IV., 407 .XVI., 339 XVII., 367 XVII., 571 .XVI., 174 XVI., 347 .XVI., 571 .XVII., 539

XV., 346 XV., 415 .XV., 71 .XIV., 337 .XII., 426

XV., 219 .XVI., 354 XVII., 437 .XVI., 330 XVII., 128

D

Danolds v. The State
Davidsburgh v. The Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co.
Davis et al. v. Clark..
Day v. Strong.
DeBaun v. Bean et al.
DePeyster v. Mali et al.
DePeyster v. Mali et al.
Desbrough v. Desbrough..
DeStuckle v. The Tehuantepec RR. Co. et al..
Devlin v. Smith et al......
Dickinson v. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y.
Dickinson v. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y..
Dillon v. The Sixth Ave. RR. Co..
Dimick v. Corley et al. ..
Dingee v. Shears
Dodd v. Neilson..
Dolz v. The Atlantic & Gulf Stream Transp. Co..
Dorrance v. Henderson....
Dow et al. v. Darragh.
Duncan et al. v. Guest.
Dunlop v. Avery.
Dunn v. The People..

.89 N. Y., 36. .90 N. Y., 526.

2 McCarty, 1. .29 Hun, 505. .29 Hun, 236. .27 Hun, 439. .92 N. Y., 262. 29 Hun, 592. .65 How., 288. .89 N. Y., 470. .28 Hun, 254.

92 N. Y., 584
.16 J. & 8., 283

3 Civ. Pro., 141.
.29 Hun, 210.
.90 N.Y., 243 .

3 Civ. Pro., 162.
.92 N. Y., 406 .
..92 N. Y., 537

2 Civ. Pro., 275.
.89 N.Y., 592
..27 Hun, 272..

XIV., 437 .XVI., 39 XIII., 391 .XVII., 328 .XVI., 218

.XV., 209 .XVI., 566 XVII., 87 .XVII., 316

. XV., 316 XVI., 130 XVII., 193 XIV., 517 .XVI., 115 .XVI., 213

XV., 336 .XVI., 210 XVII., 49 .XVI., 101

XV., 112

.XV., 241 ...XV., . 1

E

Edson et al. v. Girvan et al...
Edwards v. Woodruff et al.
Electro Silicon Co. v. Hazard et al.
Ellis v. Horriman..
Ellsworth et al. v. The Ætna Ins. Co...
Emanuel v. Ennis
Ensign et al. v. McKinney et al.,
Ensign v. The St. Louis & San F. RR. Co..

.29 Hun, 422.
.90 N. Y., 396
.29 Hun, 369.
.90 N. Y., 466
.89 N.Y., 186

16 J. & S., 430
.30 Hun, 249..
.62 How., 123.

.XVII., 106

XVI., XVII., 65 XVI., 107 .XV., 120 XVI., 430 XVII., 275

XII., 281

[blocks in formation]

XV., 206 XV., 191 XVI., 170 XVI. 177 XIV., 556 XVI., 20 XVI., 376 .XVI., 385

XVI., 565 .XVII., 37

F Farley et al. v. Carpenter.

.27 Hun, 359. Farmers L. & T. Co. v. The Long Beach Imp. Co. et al. 27 Hun, 89. Farnham v. Benedict.

..29 Hun, 44. Farnsworth v. Wood et al.

.91 N.Y., 308 Farrar v. McCue...

.89 N.Y., 139 Farwell et al. v. The Importers & Traders Natl. Bk...90 N.Y., 483 Fellows v. Longyer.

91 N. Y., 324 Felt v. Dorr...

.29 Hun, 14.. Fiester v Shepard

.92 N. Y., 251 Finkelmeier et al. v. Bates et al.

.92 N. Y., 172 First Natl. Bk. of Meadville v. The Fourth Natl. Bk. of N. Y..

.89 N. Y., 412 First Natl. Bk. of Oswego v. Dun et al...

.29 Hun, 529. Fish et al. v. Coster...

.28 Hun, 64 Fishkill Savgs. Inst. v. Bostwick et al.

.92 N. Y., 564 Fitzpatrick v. Dorland....

.27 Hun, 291. Fitzpatrick v. Slocum et al.

.89 N. Y., 358 Flack et al. v. The State

29 Hun, 286. Fleischman et al. v. Stern.

90 N.Y., 110 Fliess et al. v. Buckley et al.

.90 N.Y., 286 Fleming v. The Village of Suspension Bridge. 92 N. Y., 368 Flint v. Bell...

.27 Hun, 155. Fourth Natl. Bk. v. Boynton.

.29 Hun, 441. Fowler et al. v. Haynes.

.91 N. Y., 346 Fowler v. The Mutual Life Ins. Co..

28 Hun, 195. Fox v. Everson et al. ...

.27 Hun, 355. Fox v. Fitzsimmons.

.29 Hun, 574.. Frank et al. v. Lanier et al..

.91 N.Y., 112. Frazier v. The Town of Tompkins.

..30 Hun, 168 Frazier v. Truax et al..

.27 Hun, 587. Fredericks v. Niver et al.

28 Hun, 417. Freeman v. Coit et al..

.27 Hun, 447.

[blocks in formation]

G Gallagher v. Karns et al.,

.27 Hun, 375...... Gallagher et al v. Lupkins et al.

29 Hun, 17. Gardinier v. Knox.

27 Hun, 500. Gardner v. Lansing et al.

28 Hun, 413. Garling v. Ladd.

27 Hun, 112 Gates v. Canfield.

.28 Hun, 12. Gelster v. The Syracuse Savgs. Bk

.29 Hun, 594.. George et al. v. Grant et al...

28 Hun, 69. Getman v The Second Natl. Bk.

.89 N.Y., 136 Goddard v. Stiles..

..90 N. Y., 199. Goodale v. Lawrence..

88 N. Y., 513. Goodrich v. The Pennsylvania & N. Y. Canal & RR. C0.29 Hun, 50.. Goodwin et al. v. Ingraham,

.29 Hun, 221. Gottlieb v. The N. Y., L. E. & W. RR. Co.

.29 Hun, 637. Grandin v. Hernandez et al.

.29 Hun, 399. Grant v.Birdsall....

16 J. & S., 427. Grattan v. The Metropolitan Life Ins. Co

.92 N.Y., 274.. Green v. Smith..

.29 llun, 166. Green, v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co..

.16 J. & S., 333. Greenwood v. Marvin et al.

.29 Hun, 99.. Grow v. Snell..

.29 Hun, 598 Guilleaume y. Rowe et al.

.16 J. & S., 169. Gulerette v. McKinley.

.27 Hun, 320.. Guy v. The N.Y., Ont. & W. RR. Co...

..30 Hun, 399.

XV., 217 .XVI., 195

XV., 222 .XVI., 27

5 XV., 389 .XVII., 137

.XV., 402 .XIV., 351

536 .XV., 242 XVI., 246 XVI., 278 .XVII., 156 .XVII., 88

.XVI., 329 XVI., 194 XVI., 192

.XV., 360 .XVI., 525 XVII., 400 XIV., 196

.XV., 96 XVII., 521

H
Title of Case.

Reported in Ful.
Hadley Falls Natl. Bk. v. May

.29 Hun, 404. Haight et al. v. The Continental Ins. Co..

.92 N.Y., 51. Hall v. Brooks....

.89 N.Y., 33. Hall v. The People.

.90 N.Y. 498. Hall v. Van Vranken.

..28 Hun, 403. Hallenbeck et al. v. Donell et al.

.29 Hun, 94. Hancock v. Sears..

.29 Hun, 90.. Hancock v. Wall et al.

..28 Hun, 214. Hand v. Newton...

.92 N.Y., 88. Handy v. Draper..

.89 N. Y., 334. Hardy v. Peters et al.

.65 How., 522. Hardy v. The City of Brooklyn.

.90 N.Y., 435. Harrington v. Keteltas et al.

.92 N.Y., 40. Harris et al. v. Hiscock

.91 N.Y., 340. Harris v. Perry et al.,

.89 N.Y., 308. Havemeyer et al. v. Havemeyer et al.

.16 J & S., 104. Haynes v. Rudd...

.30 Hun, 237. Heilman v. Lazarus...

..65 How., 95.. Heiser v. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y.

..29 Hun, 446. Hennessey v. The Manhattan Fire Ins. Co.

..28 Hun, 98. Hessberg v. Riley et al. ..

.91 N.Y., 377 Heurtematte et al. v. Morris.

.28 Hun, 77.. Hiller v. The Village of Sharon Spgs.

.28 Hun, 344. Hintermeister v. Lane...

.27 Hun. 497. Hogle v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co

.28 Hun, 363. Holley v. Graf....

.29 Hun, 443. Holsman v. St. John..

.16 J. & S., 306 Holsman v. St. John et al.

.90 N. Y., 461. Home Ins. Co. v. Smith et al.

.28 Hun, 296. Horton v. Brown..

.29 Hun, 654. Houghkirk v. The D. & H. C. Co..

.28 Hun, 407. Houghkirk v. The Prest. &c. of the D. & H. C. Co....92 N. Y., 219. House v. Eisenlord..

..30 Hun, 90. Howell et al. v. Leavitt et al.

..90 N. Y. 238. Hughes et al. v. Hughes et al.

..30 Hun, 349. Humphrey v. Winthrop..

.28 Hun, 33. Hurst v. Bowen...

..30 Hun, 151. Hutchinson v. Lawrence.

.29 Hun, 450. Huttun et al. v. Benkard et al.

.92 N. Y., 295. Hyde et al. v. Salg..

27 Hun, 369. Hynes et al. v. McDermott et al.

.91 N. Y.,

451. Hynes v. Patterson et al...

.28 Hun, 528...

W. Dig. .XVI., 524 XVI, 488 XIV., 312 XVI., 98 XVI., 31 XVII., 10 .XVI., 532

.XV., 508 .XVI., 467

XIV., 473 XVII., 547

XV., 563 .XVI., 494 .XVI., 300

.XV., 44 .XIV., 72 .XVII., 482

XV., 571 XVII., 66

.XV., 354 XVI, 221 .XV., 373 .XVI., 12 .XV., 235

XVI., 9 .XVII., 187 .XV., 345

XV., 511 .XVI., 134 .XVII., 142

.XV., 522 XVI., 517 XVII., 203 ...XV., 377 XVII., 346

.XV., 544 XVII., 167 XVII., 186 XVII., 45

.XV., 211 .XVI., 323 .XVI., 344

I Inness v. Willis....

.16 J. & S., 188.. In re accounting of Fraser et al.

92 N. Y., 239. In re accounting of Macaulay.

.27 Hun, 577 In re accounting of Raymond.

.27 Hun, 508. In re accounting of Riggs et al..

.89 N. Y.. 479 In re accounting of Verplanck's exrs..

..91 N. Y., 4:39. In re accounting of Weston's exrs.

..91 N. Y., 502.. In re administration of Curser's estate.

.89 N. Y., 401. In re application of Becker...

.28 Hun, 207.. In re application of Church.

.92 N. Y., 1. In re application of Cooper.

.28 Hun, 515. In re application of Goddard.

.30 Hun, 401.
In re application of the L. S. & M. S. RR. Co. .89 N. Y., 442.
In re application of the N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co. v.
Cottle et al..

.90 N. Y., 342..
In re application of the N. Y., L. & W. RR. Co. to ac-
quire lands of Haskin..

.29 Hun, 1...
In re application of the N. Y., W. S. & B. RR. Co....89 N. Y., 453.
In re application of the N. Y., W. S. & B. RR. Co. v.
Chrystie et al. ...

.29 Hun, 276. In re application of Wadley et al.

.29 Hun, 12.

XIV., 270 .XVII., 129

.XV., 519 .XV., 252 .XV., 394 .XVI., 495 XVI., 497 .XV., 20 .XV., 446 .XVI., 510

XVI., 291 .XVII., 557

.XV., 177

.XV., 492

.XVI., 161

.XV., 26 XVII., 360 ..XVI., 359

« PreviousContinue »