TABLE OF CASES IN THE FIRST EIGHTEEN VOLUMES OF THE NEW YORK WEEKLY DIGEST, WHICH HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN FULL. N. B.-No reference is made to cases which have appeared in Memoranda in the Regular Reports. XV., 546 .XVI.. 125 Carleton v. Darcy et al.. Carncross et al. v. The People. Carroll et al. v. Lupkins et al. Catlin et al. v. Moss et al Chamberlain et al. v, Taylor et al. Champlain et al. v. Stoddart.. Chapin v. Thompson.. Chase v. Chase.. Chatfield v. Simonson et al. Childs et al. v. Kendall.. ..27 Hun, 85.. .91 N. Y., 464. .28 Hun, 25.. .90 N. Y., 566. .1 N. Y. Crim., 518. .29 Hun, 251.. 28 Hun, 371. .29 Hun, 17. .92 N. Y., 498. .27 Hun., 406 2 Civ. Pro., 94.. 2 Civ. Pro., 201. .92 N. Y., 348. .XVII., 383 .XVI., 507 .XVI., 12 .XVI., 195 .XVII., 171 XV.. 135 XV., 255 XV., 14 XVII., 55 .XVII., 76 XV., 159 .29 Hun, 615. 89 N. Y., 270.. .29 Hun, 527. XVII., 319 .92 N. Y., 209 .30 Hun, 227... .XVII., 8 XVII, 546 Davidsburgh v. The Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co......90 N. Y., 526. Day v. Strong.. Davis et al. v. Clark..... DeBaun v. Bean et al. DePeyster v. Mali et al. .89 N. Y., 36. 2 McCarty, 1. .29 Hun, 505. .29 Hun, 236. De Peyster v. Mali et al. Desbrough v. Desbrough. DeStuckle v. The Tehuantepec RR. Co. et al.. Dickinson v. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y. Devlin v. Smith et al... .27 Hun, 439. .92 N. Y., 262. .29 Hun, 592.. .65 How., 288. .89 N. Y., 470. .28 Hun, 254. 92 N. Y., 584 .XIV., 437 .XVI., 39 .XIII., 391 .XVI., 218 .XVI., 566 .XV., 316 .XVII., 193 .90 N. Y., 243. .XV., 336 ...92 N. Y., 537 .XVI., 101 ..89 N. Y., 592. .27 Hun, 272. XV., 241 XV., 1 Farmers L. & T. Co. v. The Long Beach Imp. Co. et al.27 Hun, 89.. .XV., 191 Farnham v. Benedict.. .29 Hun, 44. XVI., 170 Farwell et al. v. The Importers & Traders Natl. Bk...90 N. Y., 483 .XVI., 20 Fellows v. Longyer. .91 N. Y., 324. .XVI., 376 Felt v. Dorr.. Fiester v Shepard Goodwin et al. v. Ingraham. Goodrich v. The Pennsylvania & N. Y. Canal & RR. Co. 29 Hun, 50.. 88 N. Y., 513. .XV., 242 .XVI., 246 Gottlieb v. The N. Y., L. E. & W. RR. Co.. .29 Hun, 221. .XVI., 278 Grandin v. Hernandez et al. .29 Hun, 637. XVII., 156 Grant v. Birdsall.. Grattan v. The Metropolitan Life Ins. Co .92 N. Y., 274... .29 Hun, 399. .XVII., 88 .16 J. & S., 427. XVI., 329 .XVII., 194 Green, v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co.. .XVI., 192 ..16 J. & S., 333. XV., 360 Grow v. Snell... Guilleaume v. Rowe et al. Guy v. The N. Y., Ont. & W. RR. Co.. ..30 Hun, 399... .29 Hun, 99.. .XVI., 525 .29 Hun, 598 XVII., 400 .16 J. & S., 169. .XIV., 196 .27 Hun, 320. ..XV., 96 .XVII., 521 XVI., 517 Houghkirk v. The Prest. &c. of the D. & H. C. Co... .92 N. Y., 219. In re application of Cooper.. In re application of Goddard. In re application of the L. S. & M. S. RR. Co.. In re application of the N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co. v. In re application of the N. Y., L. & W. RR. Co. to ac- .91 N. Y., 502. .89 N. Y., 401. .28 Hun, 207. .92 N. Y., 1.. .28 Hun, 515. .30 Hun, 401. .89 N. Y., 442. .29 Hun, 1... In re application of the N. Y., W. S. & B. RR. Co....89 N. Y., 453. In re application of Wadley et al. .XVI., 497 XV., 20 XV., 446 XVI., 510 XVI., 291 XVII., 557 XV., 177 .90 N. Y., 342...... ..29 Hun, 276.. XVII., 360 ..29 Hun, 12. .XVI., 359 |