...from selling the magazines of competitors of respondent which they had been selling; (&) whether it is an unfair method of competition in violation of section 5 of the commission act for the respondent to make a practice of entering into contracts with wholesale dealers...

...competition between respondents and the aforesaid competitors. Therefore, the said acts and practices constitute an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 14. By and through the use of the aforesaid acts, practices, statements...

...specified minimum prices upon as favorable terms as were given to dealers who adhered to such prices ; held to constitute an unfair method of competition in violation of section 5 of Federal Trade Commission act. (Clayton F. Summy Co., l FTC 413.) 5. Same. — Refusal on the part of...

...Commission to decide what is unfair. The Commission is now opposed to price-maintenance, holding it to be an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. In a number of cases the Commission has issued orders to cease the practice....

...was restrained : Held, That such acquisition of stock, under the circumstances set forth, constituted an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the Act of September 26, 1914, and a violation of Section 7 of the Act of October 15, 1914. Federal Trade...

...jobbers to retailers only, and the retailers alone to direct consumers." This conduct was held to be an unfair method of competition in violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Yet the Patman bill has for its object the accomplishment of thè same...

...jobbers to retailers only, and the retailers alone to direct consumers." This conduct was held to be an unfair method of competition in violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission :Act.''' Yet the Patman bill has for its object the accomplishment of the...

...stated: That on the facts of record herein the individual concurrent use of the basingpoint system is an unfair method of competition in violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. basing-point system was illegal per se. We replied that we did not. Pages...

...5. On the facts of record in this case the individual concurrent use of the basing point system is an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act This proposition embodies the theory of Count II of the complaint and...

...space, whether directly or by means of so-called allowances, may violate the Act, and may be considered an unfair method of competition In violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Example 7: A seller offers each customer promotional allowances at the...