The Oklahoma Law Journal, Volume 14Dennis, 1915 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 14
... affirmed by a judge who , under General Order No. 13 , has sole power of re- moval , is void , and another provision of the order ap- pointing a new trustee , and a subsequent order direct- ing the old trustee to turn over assets must ...
... affirmed by a judge who , under General Order No. 13 , has sole power of re- moval , is void , and another provision of the order ap- pointing a new trustee , and a subsequent order direct- ing the old trustee to turn over assets must ...
Page 18
... Affirmed . Opinion by Collier , C. · 1. Section 6121 , Comp . Laws , 1909 ( Sec . 4927 , Rev. Laws , 1910 ) does not take away any of the pre- viously existing equitable remedies , and one who holds the legal title to land , though not ...
... Affirmed . Opinion by Collier , C. · 1. Section 6121 , Comp . Laws , 1909 ( Sec . 4927 , Rev. Laws , 1910 ) does not take away any of the pre- viously existing equitable remedies , and one who holds the legal title to land , though not ...
Page 24
... 4681. Farmers Produce Co. V. McAlester Storage , Etc. Co. et al . Er . from Superior Ct . , Pitts- burg county . Affirmed . Opinion by Robberts , C. 1. A complete contract , binding under the statute of 24 THE OKLAHOMA LAW JOURNAL.
... 4681. Farmers Produce Co. V. McAlester Storage , Etc. Co. et al . Er . from Superior Ct . , Pitts- burg county . Affirmed . Opinion by Robberts , C. 1. A complete contract , binding under the statute of 24 THE OKLAHOMA LAW JOURNAL.
Page 25
... Affirmed . Opinion by Matthews , C. 1. Where no valid service of process is had upon . the defendant in the justice of the peace court and a motion to quash service filed by him in this court is overruled and judgment goes against him ...
... Affirmed . Opinion by Matthews , C. 1. Where no valid service of process is had upon . the defendant in the justice of the peace court and a motion to quash service filed by him in this court is overruled and judgment goes against him ...
Page 26
... Evidence examined and held to support the verdict . No. A - 2240 . Comanche county . Mike Markeson v . State . From Affirmed . In a prosecution for selling liquor the evidence examined and held suffi- cient to 26 26 THE OKLAHOMA LAW ...
... Evidence examined and held to support the verdict . No. A - 2240 . Comanche county . Mike Markeson v . State . From Affirmed . In a prosecution for selling liquor the evidence examined and held suffi- cient to 26 26 THE OKLAHOMA LAW ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirmed alleged appeal ATTORNEY-AT-LAW authority bond Bryan county Carter county cent charge claim clerk Constitution contract corporation coun county attorney county court county district court county superior court damages decision deed Defendant in Error DIVISION duty election evidence fact federal file brief fund Garvin county granted held hereby overruled homa injury Insurance company interest issue Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury land lawyers lease legislative legislature ment mortgage motion to dismiss Muskogee county National Bank Noble county Okla Oklahoma City Oklahoma county OKLAHOMA LAW JOURNAL Opinion paid pany party Pawnee county person petition for rehearing Plaintiff in Error Pottawatomie county question reason Receipt is acknowledged rehearing denied rendered reversed and remanded Revised Laws Rogers county rule Section Session Laws statute Supreme Court Commission SYLLABUS taxation thereof tion trial court trict Tulsa county Wagoner county