FARM MACHINERY. From Dallas to Kansas. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. 128. FAST SERVICE. Tonnage capacity much less to the engine for fast trains than to slow ones. Nebraska State Railway Commission v. U. P. R. R. Co. 349. Statutes of some States require State business moved a minimum distance per day. Topeka Banana Dealers' Assn. et al. v. St. L. & S. F. R. R. Co. et al. 620. FERTILIZER. Nitrate of soda, when for fertilizer, at a lower rate than for manufacture. Ft. Smith Traffic Bureau v. St. L. & S. F. R. R. Co. et al. 651. Stable manure from Washington, D. C., to Glendale, Md. White Water Farms Co. v. P., B. & W. R. R. Co. 526. FINDINGS OF FACT. Commission no longer requred to state. Cattle Raisers' Asso. of Texas v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. et al. 418. FISH. Express rates on. Barnon v. Southern Express Co. 516. FLOUR Complainant is engaged in grinding spring wheat flour at Buffalo in competition with mills located at Minneapolis. On May 1, 1907, rate from Buffalo to New York on flour was advanced from 10 cents to 11 cents per 100 pounds, while no similar advance was made from Minneapolis; Held, that this 11-cent rate and one of 13 cents to New England points were unjust and unreasonable and should not exceed 10 cents to New York and 12 cents to New England points. Banner Milling Co. v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. 31. FOREIGN COMMERCE. If through billing determines jurisdiction, then all carriers participating become subject to regulation, but as to foreign business the rail carrier, so far as this law is concerned, has a purely contractural or proprietary relation, not a relation regulated by this act. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. Hamburg-American Packet Co. et al. 266. The jurisdiction of this Commission is not to be determined by anything other than the language of section 1 of the act, and in this section is found a clear distinction drawn between interstate commerce and foreign commerce to a country not adjacent to the United States; and this distinction saves such foreign commerce from the effect of that provision of the section as to continuous carriage beyond the American seaboard. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. Hamburg-American Packet Co. et al. 266. FOREIGN COUNTRY. As modified by the word " adjacent." Lykes S. S. Line v. Commercial Union et al. 310. FREE STORAGE. At Duluth in transit until opening of navigation. Commercial Club of Duluth v. N. Pac. Ry. Co. et al. 288. FUEL. Defendants claim that the necessity for fuel with which to operate their lines gives them the right to make private contracts therefor, and that the failure to count against the mines the cars furnished for such fuel supply permits them to make advantageous contracts and to get their coal at a lower price; that if they counted their own fuel cars in the distribution they would not only have to pay a higher price for their coal, but might not be able to contract for it at all. Traer v. C. & A. R. R. Co. 451. Fuel is necessary and essential to the operation of a railroad, and the right of a carrier to contract for the purchase of its fuel supply with one mine or with a number of mines must be conceded; but if a carrier and a mine owner make a contact for the fuel supply of the carrier which does violence to the act to regulate commerce or to the decisions of the courts or is opposed to public policy they are in no better position than the parties to any other contract which violates the legal principles relating thereto. A carrier can not inject illegalities in such contract and have it upheld on the ground of compelling necessity. Id. Railroads must have fuel, but not justified in beating down price by car distribution or penalizing mines. Royal Coal & Coke Co. v. So. Ry. Co. 440. FURNITURE. Rates on. New Albany Furniture Co. v. M. J. & K. C. R. R. Co. et al. 594. GILSONITE. Origin of and rates on. American Asphalt Asso. v. Uintah Ry. Co. 196. GLASS. Circumstances must be considered as to imports, etc. Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. v. P., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. et al. 87. GRADED RATES. From territory east of Missouri River to Pacific Coast terminals. Burgess et al. v. Transcontinental Freight Bureau et al. 668. "Graded" scale or tabulation showing rate on package of given size by express, when the base rate per 100 pounds is known. Kindel v. Adams D press Co. et al. 475. No impropriety in graduation of rates in accordance with actual values. In re Released Rates, 550. GRADES. Considered. American Asphalt Asso. v. Uintah Ry. Co. 196. GRAIN. Rates exacted by defendants for transporting grain and products thereof from St. Louis, Mo., to Little Rock, Ark., namely, a rate of 18 cents per 100 pounds on wheat and its products and a rate of 15 cents per 100 pounds on other kinds of grain, known as coarse grains, including corn and oats, and the products of such coarse grains, declared unlawful, so far as applied to such transportation after said traffic has been carried to St. Louis by railroad from points outside that city, and defendants required to reduce the former rate to the extent of 5 cents and the latter to the extent of 4 cents. Traffic Bureau, etc., of St. L. v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. et al. 11. Differentials from Buffalo to Atlantic ports. Banner Milling Co. v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. 31. MacMurray et al. v. U. P. R. R. Co. 531. In re allowances to elevators by U. P. R. R. Co. 498. Traffic Bureau, etc., of St. Louis, v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. et al. 105. GROUP RATES. Not disturbed without proof of tangible injury. Bovaird Supply Co. v. A. T. Pocahontas and Tug River coal fields considered as one. Raven Red Ash Point added to group. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Ry, & L. Co. v. C. &. N. W. Rates east from paper-producing points. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. N. Pac. Should not be disturbed on application of some point not in the group unless GUM LUMBER. Rates on, compared with oak. Thompson Lumber Co. et al. v. I. C. R. R. HARDWOOD. Thompson Lumber Co. et al. v. I. C. R. R. Co. et al. 657. Burgess et al. v. Transcontinental Freight Bureau et al. 668. HARTER ACT. Exemption of responsibility on account of perils of the sea. Wyman, Part- HAY. Cars for. Laning Harris Coal & Grain Co. et al. v. St. L. & S. F. R. R. Co. The defendant carrier for some years had a proportional rate of 15 cents per Ruttle et al. v. P. M. R. R. Co. 179. HEMP. Sources of production. Bovaird Supply Co. v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. et al. 56. Most early charters in this country framed on theory that railroads were HOGS. Complaint alleges that defendants' rate of $170 per car for the transportation of alleged shrinkage in weight in single-deck cars; and for alleged losses to HOURS OF SERVICE. In re Application of Ga. S. & Fla. Ry. Co. for extension of time within which In re Extension of Hours of Service Law 140. ICE. Cars and rate. Wagner, Zagelmeyer & Co. v. Det. & Mac. Ry. Co. et al. 160. ICING. Fish in transit. IMPORT RATES. Bannon v. Southern Express Co. 516. To make the total through charge from a foreign point of origin the abso- Detroit Chemical Works v. Northern Central Ry. Co. et al. 357. INDUSTRIAL LINES. Where a railroad has been constructed for a special purpose, and does not Leonard v. K. C. S. Ry. Co. et al. 573. La Salle & Bureau County R. R. Co. v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co. 610. An interstate carrier, in order to build up enterprises of the same character No part of business of railroad to define territory into which particular ship- One industry may not be built up by privileges denied to and which work an 451. INLAND CARRIAGE. This position does not conclude the Commission against an examination into Unjust discrimination in rates against domestic shipments of plate glass in Under the law, as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States in Transportation from a seaport of the United States or an adjacent foreign The rate of $2.32 per ton of 2,240 pounds on imported iron pyrites from Balti- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. Hamburg-American Packet Co. et al. 266. INSURANCE. Included in rate. Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. B. & M. R. R. Co. et al. 258. On the facts shown of record: Held, That the complainant is entitled to INTEREST. Cases in which interest is included in orders for reparation : Baer Brothers Mercantile Company v. Missouri Pacific Railway Com- Frye & Bruhn et al. v. Northern Pacific Railway Company et al. 501. Koch Secret Service v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, 523. |