...applicant for patent, or (f) he did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented, or (g) before the applicant's invention thereof the invention...to conceive and last to reduce to practice, from a tune prior to conception by the other (RS 4886, 4887, 4923; 35 USC, 1946 ed., 31, 32, 72). *******...

...which would seem to interfere with any pending application or any unexpired patent (35 USC 135). 3. "In determining priority of invention there shall be considered not only the respective dates of a conception and reduction to practice of the invention, but also the reasonable diligence of one who...

...which would seem to interfere with any pending application or any unexpired patent (35 USC 135). 3. "In determining priority of invention there shall be considered not only the respective dates of a conception and reduction to practice of the invention, but also the reasonable diligence of one who...

...applicant for patent, or (f) he did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented, or (g) before the applicant's invention thereof the invention...who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it. * * * § 103. CONDITIONS FOR PATENTABILITY J NON -OBVIOUS SUBJECT MATTER. A patent may not be obtained...

...statutory basis in 35 USC 102 (g), which specifies, as one ground for denying a patent, that (g) hefore the applicant's invention thereof the invention was...who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it. Here Vogel is a do facto first inventor, baring coneededly made an actual reduction to practice before...

...which appellant lost in interference by concession of priority are materials of which it must be said "before the applicant's invention thereof the invention was made in this country by another." Those last-quoted words are, of course, from §102(g). The opinion continues : Those compounds become...

...patent, or 6 "(f ) he did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be ' patented, or 8 " (g) before the applicant's invention thereof the invention...in this country by another who had not abandoned, sup10 pressed, or concealed it. In determining priority of invention 11 there shall be considered not...

...made by the inventor, provided the other had not abandoned his invention. In determining priority, there shall be considered not only the respective...dates of conception and reduction to practice of the claimed invention, but also the reasonable diligence of one who was first to conceive and last to reduce...

...the application ; and further provided that such other has not suppressed or concealed his invention. In determining priority of invention, there shall...conceive and last to reduce to practice, from a time before conception by the other until his own reduction to practice. However, In establishing priority...

...the application ; and further provided that such other has not suppressed or concealed his invention. In determining priority of invention, there shall...conceive and last to reduce to practice, from a time before conception by the other until his own reduction to practice. However, in establishing priority...