 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - Law reports, digests, etc - 1958 - 966 pages
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1967 - 124 pages
...filed constitutes part of the "prior art" as that term is used in 35 USC ยง 103, which reads in part : "A patent may not be obtained ... if the differences...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States - Law - 2000 - 1208 pages
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Patent laws and legislation - 1952 - 170 pages
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 ~of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1954 - 480 pages
...something unobvious. 35 USC 103. Refusal of a patent is proper, under the new law, as it was under the old, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the alleged invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1956 - 536 pages
...is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title [the prior art], if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1662 pages
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1960 - 1034 pages
...invention. This is for the reason that, even though an invention is "new and useful" it is not patentable "if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
| |
A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter... 
