International Antidumping Code: Hearing, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session. June 27, 1968, Volume 49
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 - Dumping (International trade) - 388 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action agree agreement amended American amount Antidumping Act appear apply appraisement authority basis cause Cement Industry CHAIRMAN circumstances clear CLUBB Commissioner Committee competition complaint concerned conclusion Congress consideration considered consistent Constitution cost Court Customs decision determination domestic domestic industry dumping duties effect established evidence Executive existing exportation fact factors fair value Finance finding foreign give going hearing implement imports industry injury interested International Antidumping Code interpretation involved July kind legislation less than fair LIBRARY majority material injury matter means merchandise negotiations notice Office paragraph parties permit person position practice present President principal procedures proceeding proposed provisions question reason referred regard regulations REHM relating Representative respect result revision Roth Secretary Senator HARTKE SMITH sold Special statement Tariff Commission tion trade Trade Expansion Act Treasury Department understand unfair United
Page 381 - ... between manufacturers, or between producers, or between wholesalers, or between brokers, or between factors, or between retailers, or between persons, firms, or corporations in competition with each other.
Page 70 - That whenever the Secretary of the Treasury (hereinafter in this act called the "Secretary"), after such investigation as he deems necessary, finds that an industry in the United States is being or is likely to be injured or is prevented from being established...
Page 381 - Provided, that nothing herein contained shall render illegal, contracts or agreements prescribing minimum prices for the resale of a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trademark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, when contracts or agreements of that description are lawful as applied to intrastate transactions...
Page 388 - Unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation of articles into the United States, or in their sale by the owner, importer, consignee, or agent of either, the effect or tendency of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry, efficiently and economically operated, in the United States...
Page 381 - ... brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, when contracts or agreements of that description are lawful as applied to intrastate transactions, under any statute, law, or public policy now or hereafter in effect in any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia in which such resale is to be made, or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale...
Page 384 - Whenever the commission shall have reason to believe that any such person, partnership, or corporation has been or is using any unfair method of competition in commerce and if it shall appear to the commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public...
Page 384 - Commission, and enforcing the same to the extent that such order is affirmed and to issue such writs as are ancillary to its jurisdiction or are necessary in its judgment to prevent injury to the public or to competitors pendente lite.
Page 290 - domestic industry" shall be interpreted as referring to the domestic producers as a whole of the like products or to those of them whose collective output of the products constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of those products, except that: (i) when producers are related to the exporters or importers or are themselves importers of the allegedly dumped product, the term "domestic industry...
Page 387 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Page 388 - ... is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the proceeding before the Commission, the court may order such additional evidence to be taken before the Commission and to be adduced upon the hearing in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as to the court may seem proper.