The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder... Commentaries on American Law - Page 203by James Kent - 1848Full view - About this book
| Sir Edward Coke, Sir Thomas Littleton, John Henry Thomas - Land tenure - 1818 - 752 pages
...before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty...before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent. Foam. Cont. Kem. 329. Prest.... | |
| Sir Edward Coke - Law reports, digests, etc - 1826 - 734 pages
...death of the tenant in tail ; the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possessions were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become laçant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested "•maiuder... | |
| William Blackstone - Law - 1827 - 916 pages
...before thi; death of the tenant for lite. The present capacity of taking oieci in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will br-oome vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested... | |
| Sir Edward Coke, John Henry Thomas - Land tenure - 1827 - 884 pages
...of taking elFect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty thai the possession will become vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder from oifc that is contingent. Fearn. Cont. Rem. 329. Prest.... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1914 - 768 pages
...approval and adds : "The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were now to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession...before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent. By r-apacity, as thus applied,... | |
| Charles Petersdorff - Law - 1831 - 592 pages
...before the death of the tenant fur life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty...before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally diatinguisbea a vested remainder from one that is contingent; FtMrn. Con. Rein. -'29; Prest.... | |
| Sir Edward Coke, John Henry Thomas - Land tenure - 1836 - 796 pages
...before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty...before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent. Feain. Cont. Rem. 329. Prest.... | |
| Charles Watkins, Henry Hopley White - Conveyancing - 1838 - 596 pages
...before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty...before the estate limited in remainder determines, distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent. Fearne's CR 216.] son to whom the remainder... | |
| William Blackstone - Great Britain - 1838 - 910 pages
...before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty...before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a rested remainder from one that is contingent." 2 Cruise Dig. 270. See also... | |
| Solomon Atkinson - Conveyancing - 1839 - 708 pages
...before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty...before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent. Thus, suppose a lease for... | |
| |